Advertisement

Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 413–429 | Cite as

The body of the other: intercorporeality and the phenomenology of agoraphobia

  • Dylan TriggEmail author
Article

Abstract

How is our experience of the world affected by our experience of others? Such is the question I will be exploring in this paper. I will do so via the agoraphobic condition. In agoraphobia, we are rewarded with an enriched glimpse into the intersubjective formation of the world, and in particular to our embodied experience of that social space. I will be making two key claims. First, intersubjectivity is essentially an issue of intercorporeality, a point I shall explore with recourse to Merleau-Ponty’s account of the prepersonal body. The implication of this claim is that evading or withdrawing from the other remains structurally impossible so long as we remain bodily subjects. Second, the necessary relation with others defines our thematic and affective experience of the world. Far from a formal connection with others, the corporeal basis of intersubjectivity means that our lived experience of the world is mediated via our bodily relations with others. In this way, intercorporeality reveals the body as being dynamically receptive to social interactions with others. Each of these claims is demonstrated via a phenomenological analysis of the agoraphobe’s interaction with others. From this analysis, I conclude that our experience of the world is affected by our experience of others precisely because we are in a bodily relation with others. Such a relation is not causally linked, as though first there were a body, then a world, and then a subject that provided a thematic and affective context to that experience. Instead, body, other, and world are each intertwined in a single unity and cannot be considered apart.

Keywords

Phenomenology Other Merleau-Ponty Embodiment Intersubjectivity Anxiety World 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge the support of the “European Platform for Life Sciences, Mind Sciences, and the Humanities” grant by the Volkswagen Stiftung for the project Narcissus and Echo: Self-Consciousness and the Inter-Subjective Body. Thanks also to Dorothée Legrand and Line Ryberg Ingerslev for their comments on this paper. Additional thanks to the two anonymous reviewers of this paper; their feedback proved immensely helpful.

References

  1. Chambless, Dianne, and Alan Goldstein. 1982. Agoraphobia: multiple perspectives on theory and treatment. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, Joyce. 2003. Phobic geographies: the phenomenology of spatial identity. London: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dillon, M.C. 1997. Merleau-Ponty’s ontology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Husserl, Edmund. 1977. Cartesian Mediations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Dorion Carins. Dordrecht; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Pub.Google Scholar
  5. Freud, Sigmund. 2001. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Volume III. Trans. James Strachey. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  6. Jacobson, Kirsten. 2004. Agoraphobia and hypochondria as disorders of dwelling. International Studies in Philosophy 36: 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knapp, Terry. 1988. Westphal’s “Die Agoraphobie” with Commentary: The Beginnings of Agoraphobia. Trans. Michael T. Schumacher. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  8. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1999. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Marks, Isaac. 1987. Fears, phobias, and rituals: panic, anxiety, and their disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964a. The Primacy of Perception, ed James M. Edie. Trans. William Cobb. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964b. Signs. Trans. Richard McCleary. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2006. The Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Colin Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2008. The World of Perception. Trans. Oliver Davies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Sadowsky, Stewart. 1997. Agoraphobia, Erwin Straus and phenomenological psychopathology. The Humanistic Psychologist 25: 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1998. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Trigg, Dylan. 2013. Bodily Moods and Unhomely Environments: The Hermeneutics of Agoraphobia and the Spirit of Place (Forthcoming: Interpreting Nature: The Emerging Field of Environmental Hermeneutics. Edited by Forrest Clingerman, Martin Drenthen, Brian Treanor, and David Utsler. New York: Fordham University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Trigg, Dylan. 2012. The memory of place: a phenomenology of the uncanny. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Trotter, David. 2004. The invention of agoraphobia. Victorian Literature and Culture 32: 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Winnicott, Donald. 2005. Playing and reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PhilosophyUniversity College DublinDublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations