Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 171–188 | Cite as

Objects with a past: Husserl on “ad-memorizing apperceptions”

  • Christian Ferencz-Flatz


In a late notation from 1932, Husserl emphasizes the fact that a broad concept of “apperception” should also include, alongside his usual examples, the apprehension of objects as bearers of an individual or inter-subjective past, specifically “indicated” with them; thus, he distinguishes between apperceptions “appresenting” a simultaneous content (co-presentations), anticipatory apperceptions pointing to future incidents, and retrospective apperceptions referring to “ad-memorized” (hinzuerinnert, ad-memoriert) features and events. The latter sort of apperceptions are involved not only in our apprehension of historical traces and relics, but also in that of causal relations, familiar objects, and cultural objects in general. Following several later notations of Husserl concerning the topic of “apperceptions,” this paper outlines the specific intentional structure of retrospective or evocative apperceptions, analyzing their various possible forms.


Husserl Memory Apperception Evocation Acquaintance Indication 



This work was supported by CNCS-UEFISCDI, project number PN II-RU TE-155/2010.


  1. Dwyer, Daniel J. 2007. Husserl’s appropriation of the psychological concepts of apperception and attention. Husserl Studies 23(2): 83–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eisler, Rudolf. 1904. Wörterbuch der philosophischen Begriffe. Berlin: Mittler.Google Scholar
  3. Ferencz-Flatz, Christian. 2009. Gibt es perzeptive Phantasie? Als-ob-Bewusstsein, Widerstreit und Neutralität in Husserls Aufzeichnungen zur Bildbetrachtung. Husserl Studies 25: 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fraisopi, Fausto. 2009. Expérience et horizon chez Husserl: Contextualité et synthèse à partir du concept de “représentation vide”. Studia Phaenomenologica 9: 455–475.Google Scholar
  5. Goethe, JohannWolfgang. 2009. Italienische Reise. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. 1999. Ontologie. Hermeneutik der Faktizität (SS 1923). GA 63. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann. Ontology: The Hermeneutics of Facticity (trans: Van Buren, J.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, Martin. 2006. Sein und Zeit, Tübingen: Niemeyer. (trans: Stambaugh, J.). Being and Time. New York: SUNY (1996).Google Scholar
  8. Heidegger, Martin. 2010. Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (WS 1919/1920). GA 58. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
  9. Holenstein, Elmar. 1972. Phänomenologie der Assoziation. Zu Struktur und Funktion eines Grundprinzips der passiven Genesis bei E. Husserl. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, Edmund. 1966. Analysen zur passiven Synthesis. Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten (19181926). Hua XI. The Hague: Nijhoff. Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic (trans: Steinbock, A. J.). Dordrecht: Kluwer (2001).Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, Edmund. 1968. Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen SS 1925. Hua IX. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 19291935. Hua XV. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, Edmund. 1976. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die Phänomenologie. Hua III/1. The Hague: Kluwer. Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology (trans: Kersten, Fred). The Hague: Kluwer (1983).Google Scholar
  14. Husserl, Edmund. 1980. Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. Texte aus dem Nachlass (18981925). Hua XXIII. The Hague: Nijhoff. Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925) (trans: Brough, J. B.). Dordrecht: Springer (2005).Google Scholar
  15. Husserl, Edmund. 1984. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band. I. Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Hua XIX/1. The Hague: Kluwer. Logical Investigations (trans: Findlay, N.). Volume 1. London: Routledge (2001).Google Scholar
  16. Husserl, Edmund. 1999. Erfahrung und Urteil. EU. Hamburg: Meiner. Experience and Judgement (trans: Churchill, J. S.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press (1975).Google Scholar
  17. Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logik. Vorlesung 1902/1903. Hua Mat II. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, Edmund. 2006. Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (19291934). Die C-Manuskripte. Hua Mat VIII. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Husserl, Edmund. 2008. Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (19161937). Hua XXXIX. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Walton, Roberto J. 2003. On the Manifold Senses of Horizonedness. The Theories of E. Husserl and A. Gurwitsch. Husserl Studies 19/1:1–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alexandru Dragomir Institute for Philosophy/Romanian Society for PhenomenologyBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations