Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 297–306 | Cite as

Don Ihde: Heidegger’s technologies: Postphenomenological perspectives

Fordham University Press, New York, 2010, 155 pp, ISBN-13: 978-0823233762 US $60.00(cloth), ISBN-13: 978-0823233779, US $22.00 (paper)
Article

References

  1. Feenberg, Andrew. 2006. Replies to critics. In Democratizing technology: Andrew Feenberg’s critical theory of technology, ed. Tyler J. Veak, 175–210. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Feenberg, Andrew. 2010. Between reason and experience: Essays on technology and modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ihde, Don. 1991. Instrumental realism: The interface between philosophy of science and philosophy of technology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ihde, Don. 1998. Expanding hermeneutics: Visualism in science. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ihde, Don. 2006. Forty years in the wilderness. In Postphenomenology: A critical companion to Ihde, ed. Evan Selinger, 267–290. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  6. Mitcham, Carl. 1994. Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Rouse, Joseph. 1996. Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically Ithaca. NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Scharff, Robert C. 2006. If phenomenology is an Albatross, is post-phenomenology possible? In Chasing technoscience: Matrix for materiality, ed. Don Ihde, and Evan Selinger, 131–144. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Selinger, Evan. 2008. Normative judgment and technoscience: Nudging Ihde, again. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 12(2): 120–125.Google Scholar
  11. Woessner, Martin. 2011. Heidegger in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations