Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 491–510 | Cite as

Poetry as anti-discourse: formalism, hermeneutics, and the poetics of Paul Celan

Article
  • 278 Downloads

Abstract

I argue from a hermeneutic point of view that formal elements of poetry can only be identified because poetry is based on both the phenomenon and the conception of poetry, both of which precede the attempt to identify formal elements as the defining moment of poetry. Furthermore, I argue with Gadamer that poetry is based on a rupture with and an epoche of our non-poetic use of language in such a way that it liberates “fixed” universal aspects of everyday language, and that through establishing itself in a new, self-referential and monologue unity, it individualizes speech. From the hermeneutic position, poetry is a form of speaking rather than a “fixed” object. As such, I will try to make sense of what Paul Celan said in his famous “Meridian” speech: namely, that the poem is “actualized language, set free under the sign of a radical individuation, which at the same time stays mindful of the limits drawn by language, the possibilities opened by language.”

Keywords

Celan Ribeiro Gadamer Heidegger Hermeneutics Poetry Language Poetic speech Poetics 

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. 1991. Notes on literature, vol 1 (trans: Nicholsen, S.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blumenberg, Hans. 2001. Ästhetische and metaphorologische schriften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  3. Celan, Paul. 1999. Meridian, Tübinger Ausgabe. Endfassung, Vorstufen, Materialien. Hg. von B. Boeschenstein and H. Schmull. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Celan, Paul. 2001a. Mikrolithen sinds, Steinchen. Die Prosa aus dem Nachlass. Kritische Aysgabe. Hg. B. Wiedemann and B. Badiou. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  5. Celan, Paul. 2001b. Selected poems and prose of Paul Celan (trans: Felstiner, J.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Celan, Paul. 2005. Die Gedichte. Kommentierte Gesamtausgabe. Hg. B. Wiedemann. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  7. Cesare, Donatella Di. 2004. Stars and constellations. The difference between Gadamer and Derrida. Research in Phenomenology 34: 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Culler, Jonathan. 2000. Philosophy and literature: The fortunes of the performative. Poetics Today 21(3): 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrida, Jacques. 2005. Sovereignities in question. The poetics of Paul Celan. Ed. T. Dutoit and O. Pasanen. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1986. The relevance of the beautiful and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
  11. Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1993. Gesammelte Werke, vol. 10. Guetersloh: UTB.Google Scholar
  12. Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1997. Who am I and who are you? New york: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gadamer, Hans Georg. 2003. Truth and method. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Gadamer, Hans Georg. 2008. Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hegel, G.W.F. 1988. Hegel’s aesthetics. Lectures on fine art, vol. II (trans: Knox, T.M.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heidegger, Martin. 2000. Elucidations of Hoelderlin’s poetry (Trans: Hoeller, Keith). New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  17. Heidegger, Martin. 2001. Language, poetry, truth. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, Martin. 1967. Being and time (trans: Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  19. Ivanovic, Christine. 2002. „Nesselschrift. Stimmen im Zentrum von Celans Werk.“Interpretationen. Gedichte von Paul Celan. Hg. von H.-M. Speier. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  20. Jacobson, Roman. 1979. Poetik. Ausgewählte Aufsätze 1921–1971. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe 1999. Poetry as experience (Trans: Tarnowski, A.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lawn, Christopher. 2001. Gadamer on poetic and everyday language. Philosophy and Literature 25: 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson, Juergen H. 1996. Fiktionalität und Ästhetik. Eine Philosophie der Dichtung. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
  24. Ribeiro, Anna Christina. 2007. Intending to repeat: A definition of poetry. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ribeiro, Anna Christina. 2009. Toward a philosophy of poetry. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33: 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stierle, Karl-Heinz 1982. Gibt es eine poetische Sprache? Poetica 14, 270–278.Google Scholar
  27. Stierle, Karl-Heinz. 2003. Sprache und die Identität des Gedichts. Das Beispiel Hölderlins. Friedrich Hölderlin. Wege der Forschung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 19–34.Google Scholar
  28. Stierle, Karl-Heinz. 2008. Lyrik—eine Gattung zweiter Ordnung? Ein theoretischer Vorschlag und drei Paradigmen. Sprachen der Lyrik von der Antike zur Digitalen Poesie. Stuttgart: Steiner, pp. 131–144.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations