Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 341–357

Organism, normativity, plasticity: Canguilhem, Kant, Malabou

Article

Abstract

Some of Catherine Malabou’s recent work has developed her conception of plasticity (originally deployed in a reading of Hegelian Aufhebung) in relation to neuroscience. This development clarifies and advances her attempt to bring contemporary theory into dialogue with the natural sciences, while indirectly indicating her engagement with the French tradition in philosophy of science and philosophy of medicine, especially the work of Georges Canguilhem. I argue that we can see her development of plasticity as an answer to some specific shortcomings in Canguilhem’s conception of organic or biological normativity as advanced in The Normal and the Pathological. Such a view of plasticity shows its potential to provide the basis for a powerful critical engagement with contemporary conceptions of selfhood, self-transformation, subjectivation, and the general theory of norms.

Keywords

Canguilhem Malabou Kant Hegel Normativity Organism Plastic Plasticity 

References

  1. Canguilhem, Georges. 1970a. Dialectique et philosophie du Non chez Gaston Bachelard. In (Canguilhem 1970b), 196–207.Google Scholar
  2. Canguilhem, Georges. 1970b. Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences, 2nd ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  3. Canguilhem, Georges. 1988. Ideology and rationality in the history of the life sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Canguilhem, Georges. 1991. The normal and the pathological (trans. Fawcett and Cohen). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  5. Canguilhem, Georges. 1993. Le cerveau et la pensée. In Georges Canguilhem: Philosophe, historien des sciences. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  6. Canguilhem, Georges. 1994. A vital rationalist: selected writings. In ed George Canguilhem, François Delaporte (trans. Arthur Goldhammer). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, Jacques. 2002a. Acts of religion, ed. G. Anidjar. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, Jacques. 2002b. Force of law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’ (trans. M. Quintaince, rev. G. Anidjar). In (Derrida 2002a), 230–298.Google Scholar
  9. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit (trans. A.V. Miller). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (trans. Mary Gregor). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Machery, Pierre. 2009. De Canguilhem à Foucault: La force des normes. Paris: La fabrique.Google Scholar
  13. Malabou, Catherine. 2004a. Le Change Heidegger. Paris: Léo Scheer.Google Scholar
  14. Malabou, Catherine. 2004b. Pierre aime les horranges. In Sens en tous sens, Autour du travail de Jean-Luc Nancy, 39–57. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  15. Malabou, Catherine. 2005. The future of hegel: Plasticity, temporality and dialectic (trans. Lisbeth During). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Malabou, Catherine. 2007a. The end of writing? Grammatology and plasticity (trans. Annjeanette Wiese). The European Legacy 12.4:431–441.Google Scholar
  17. Malabou, Catherine. 2007b. Les nouveaux blesses: De Freud à la neurologie, penser les traumatismes contemporains. Paris: Bayard.Google Scholar
  18. Malabou, Catherine. 2008. What should we do with our brain? (trans. Sebastian Rand). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Malabou, Catherine. 2009a. Changer de différence: le féminin et la question philosophique. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  20. Malabou, Catherine. 2009b. Ontologie de l’accident. Paris: Léo Scheer.Google Scholar
  21. Malabou, Catherine. 2009c. Plasticity at the dusk of writing (trans. Carolyn Shread). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Malabou, Catherine, and Judith Butler. 2010. Sois mon corps. Paris: Bayard.Google Scholar
  23. Mandik, Peter. 2009. Review of Catherine Malabou, what should we do with our brain? Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews archive. http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=15887. Accessed 14 February 2010.
  24. Steinbock, Anthony J. 1995. Home and beyond: Genetic phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations