Advertisement

Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 151–164 | Cite as

In place of the Other

  • Bernhard WaldenfelsEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper outlines the basic traits of a responsive phenomenology by focusing on the issue of originary substitution. On the one hand, a phenomenology of alienness or otherness and an ethics of the other in the sense of Levinas will prove to be closely bound up with this sort of substitution. On the other side, this substitution can be concretised by transitional figures such as the advocate, the therapist, the translator, the witness, or the field researcher; they all intervene from the position of a Third without closing the fissure which opens between ourselves and the Other, between the own and the alien. Precisely by focussing on the issue of substitution, we have the opportunity to outline the basis traits of a responsive phenomenology and to discuss some of its institutional consequences.

Keywords

Substitution Levinas The Other Derrida Response Responsibility Phenomenology 

References

  1. Därmann, Iris. 2005. Fremde Monde der Vernunft. Die ethnologische Provokation der Vernunft. München: W. Fink.Google Scholar
  2. Derrida, Jacques. 1967a. De la Grammatologie, Paris: Minuit. Engl. of Grammatology (trans: Spivak, G.C.), 1998. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  3. Derrida, Jacques. 1967b. La voix et le phénomène, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, Engl. Voice and Phenomenon (trans: Lawlor, L.), 2011. Northwestern Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, Sigmund. 1976. Hemmung, Symptom und Angst (GW, vol. XIV). Frankfurt/M: Fischer.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, Martin. 1979. Heraklit (GA, vol. 55). Frankfurt/M: Klostermann.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. 1953. Sein und Zeit. 7. ed., Tübingen: Niemeyer. Engl. Being and Time (trans: Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.), 1962. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  7. Hirsch, Alfred. 1995. Der Dialog der Sprachen. Studien zum Sprach- und Übersetzungsdenken Walter Benjamins und Jacques Derridas. München: W. Fink.Google Scholar
  8. Hirsch, Alfred. 2004. Recht auf Gewalt?. München: W. Fink.Google Scholar
  9. Laplanche, Jean. 1997. Le primat de l’’autre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  10. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1974. Autrement qu’être ou au-delà de l’essence, The Hague: M. Nijhoff. Engl. Otherwise than Being, or Beyond Essence (trans: Lingis, A.), 1981. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 1994. Antwortregister. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp. Engl. (trans.) Northwestern Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  12. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 1999. Vielstimmigkeit der Rede. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  13. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2002. Bruchlinien der Erfahrung. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2005a. Idiome des Denkens. Deutsch-Französische Gedankengänge II. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  15. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2005b. Levinas on the Saying and the Said. In Addressing Levinas, ed. E.S. Nelson, A. Kapust and K. Still. Evanston: Northwestern Press.Google Scholar
  16. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2006a. Grundmotive einer Phänomenologie des Fremden. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp. Engl. (trans.) Northwestern Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  17. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2006b. Schattenrisse der Moral. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  18. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2009. Spielräume des Mögliche und Überschüsse des Unmöglichen. In Unmöglichkeiten, ed. I.U. Dalferth, Ph. Stoellger and A. Hunziker. Tübingen: Siebeck.Google Scholar
  19. Winnicott, Donald W. 1971. Playing and reality. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für PhilosophieRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations