Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 1–21

Challenging the transcendental position: the holism of experience



Taking the problem of perception and illusion as a leading clue, this article presents a new phenomenological approach to perception and the world: “holism of experience.” It challenges not only Husserl’s transcendentalism, but also what remains of it in Heidegger’s early thought, on the grounds that it is committed to the skeptical inference: “Since we can always doubt any perception, we can always doubt perception as a whole.” The rejection of such an implicit inference leads to a relational paradigm of Being-in-the-World that differs from Heidegger’s on many points.


Holism Heidegger Husserl Skepticism Evenemential hermeneutics 


  1. Austin, J.L. 1962. Sense and sensibilia. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boehm, R. 1959. Les ambiguïtés des concepts husserliens d’’immanence’ et de ‘transcendance’. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 84: 481–526.Google Scholar
  3. Dilthey, W. 1992. Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 7, Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften.Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 229.Google Scholar
  4. Dilthey, W. 2002. In The formation of the historical world in the human sciences, ed. R.A. Makkreel, and F. Rodi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and time (trans: John Macquarrie, and Edward Robinson). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, M. 1984. The metaphysical foundations of logic (trans: Michael Heim). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, M. 1986. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Heidegger, M. 1988. The basic problems of phenomenology (trans: Richard Rojcewicz, and André Schuwer). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, M. 1992. History of the concept of time: Prolegomena (trans: Theodore Kisiel). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Heidegger, M. 1994. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 20, Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, M. 1997. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 24, Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M. 1999. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 56/57, Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. 2007. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 26. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  14. Hinton, J.M. 1973. Experiences. An inquiry into some ambiguities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Husserl, E. 1973. Cartesian meditations. An introduction to phenomenology (trans: Dorion Cairns). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  16. Husserl, E. 1982. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (First Book, trans: Kersten, F.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Husserl, E. 1997. Thing and space: Lectures of 1907 (trans: Richard Rojcewicz). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. 1998. The Paris lectures (trans: Peter Koestenbaum). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Ingarden, R. 1975. On the motives which led Husserl to transcendental idealism (trans: Arnór Hannibalsson). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  20. McDowell, J. 1998. Criteria, defeasibility and knowledge. In meaning, knowledge and reality, 369–394. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception (trans: Colin Smith). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  22. Putnam, H. 1999. The threefold cord: Mind, body and world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Presses Universitaires de France 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris Sorbonne (Paris IV)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations