Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 193–206 | Cite as

Levinas in Japan: the ethics of alterity and the philosophy of no-self

Article

Abstract

Does the Buddhist doctrine of no-self imply, simply put, no-other? Does this doctrine necessarily come into conflict with an ethics premised on the alterity of the other? This article explores these questions by situating Emmanuel Levinas’s ethics in the context of contemporary Japanese philosophy. The work of twentieth-century Japanese philosopher Watsuji Tetsurō provides a starting point from which to consider the ethics of the self-other relation in light of the Buddhist notion of emptiness. The philosophy of thirteenth-century Zen Master Dōgen casts doubt on Watsuji’s commitment to reciprocal self-other relationality, showing that the idea of self-emptiness disrupts any conventional understanding of reciprocity and promotes instead other-oriented compassion. Despite interesting similarities between the ethics of alterity and Buddhist compassion, a Buddhist-influenced understanding of alterity differs from Levinas on important points, by making possible the claim that all others—human, animal, plant, and mineral—are ethical others.

Keywords

Alterity Buddhism Comparative philosophy Ethics 

References

  1. Bernasconi, Robert. 1988. ‘Failure of communication’ as a Surplus: Dialogue and lack of dialogue between Buber and Levinas. In The provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the other, ed. Robert Bernasconi and David Wood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Dalmiya, Vrinda. 2001. Particularizing the moral self: A feminist Buddhist exchange. Sophia 40 (1): 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Diehm, Christian. 2004. Facing nature: Levinas beyond the human. In Emmanuel Levinas: Critical assessments of leading philosophers, ed. ClaireElise Katz. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  4. Dōgen. 1971–1972. In 正法眼蔵 [Shōbōgenzō], ed. Nakamura Sōichi, 4 vols. Tōkyō: Shibata Yoshiko.Google Scholar
  5. Kazuaki, Tanahashi, ed. 1985. Moon in a dewdrop: Writings of Zen Master Dōgen. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kim, Hee-Jin. 1987. Dōgen Kigen: Mystical realist. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  7. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1961. Totality and infinity (trans. Lingis, A.). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mayeda, Graham. 2006. Time, space and ethics in the philosophy of Watsuji Tetsurō, Kuki Shūzō, and Martin Heidegger. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Rome, Sydney, and Beatrice Rome, eds. 1964. Philosophical interrogations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  10. Watsuji, Tetsurō. 1996. Rinrigaku. In Watsuji Tetsurō’s Rinrigaku: Ethics in Japan (trans: Seisaku, Y. and Carter, R.E.). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  11. Yamazaki, Masakazu, ed. 1972. 正法眼蔵随聞記 [Shōbōgenzō zuimonki]. Tōkyō: Kodansha.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations