Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 207–239

Marion, Levinas, and Heidegger on the question concerning ontotheology



In this article, the differences between Jean-Luc Marion, Emmanuel Levinas and Martin Heidegger’s approaches to ontotheology are discussed. Whereas Marion argues for a historical approach to this question, i.e., testing whether ontotheology can be detected in this or that thinker in this history of philosophy, this article aims, with Levinas and Heidegger, for an ontological approach to the question concerning ontotheology. In this regard, this text expresses wonder about Marion’s claim that Medieval theology would not have succumbed to ontotheology whereas ancient and modern did. It is shown that ontotheology, for Levinas as well as Heidegger, might not be overcome with a simple command but rather belongs to the very structure of thought. The article concludes with offering some corrections to the Levinasian ‘God outside of onto-theology’ by a more phenomenological account of being-in-the world.


Heidegger Levinas Marion Ontotheology 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO-V)LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations