Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 207–239 | Cite as

Marion, Levinas, and Heidegger on the question concerning ontotheology

Article
  • 328 Downloads

Abstract

In this article, the differences between Jean-Luc Marion, Emmanuel Levinas and Martin Heidegger’s approaches to ontotheology are discussed. Whereas Marion argues for a historical approach to this question, i.e., testing whether ontotheology can be detected in this or that thinker in this history of philosophy, this article aims, with Levinas and Heidegger, for an ontological approach to the question concerning ontotheology. In this regard, this text expresses wonder about Marion’s claim that Medieval theology would not have succumbed to ontotheology whereas ancient and modern did. It is shown that ontotheology, for Levinas as well as Heidegger, might not be overcome with a simple command but rather belongs to the very structure of thought. The article concludes with offering some corrections to the Levinasian ‘God outside of onto-theology’ by a more phenomenological account of being-in-the world.

Keywords

Heidegger Levinas Marion Ontotheology 

References

  1. Caputo, John. 1982. Heidegger and Aquinas. An essay on overcoming metaphysics. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Writing and difference (trans: Bass, A.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of philosophy (trans: Bass, Alan). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Heidegger, Martin. 1962a. Being and time (trans: Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, Martin. 1962b. Die Frage nach dem ding. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, Martin. 1976. Identität und Differenz. Pfüllingen: Neske.Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, Martin. 1982. On the way to language (trans: Hert, Peter D.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  8. Heidegger, Martin. 1988. The basic problems of phenomenology (trans: Hofstadter, Albert). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heidegger, Martin. 1992a. Parmenides. Frankfurt a. Main: Vittorio Kostermann.Google Scholar
  10. Heidegger, Martin. 1992b. Platon’s sophistes. Frankfurt a. Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger, Martin. 1995. The fundamental concepts of metaphysics (trans: Mcneill, William and Walker, Nicholas). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, Martin. 1997. Platon’s sophist (trans: Rojcewicz, Richard and Schuwer, Andre). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, Martin. 1998a. Was ist Metaphysik?. Frankfurt a. Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, Martin. 1998b. Pathmarks, ed. William Mcneill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, Martin. 2002. The onto-theo-logical constitution of metaphysics. In Identity and difference (trans: Stambaugh, Joan), 42–76. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heidegger, Martin. 2006. Introduction to phenomenological research (trans: Dahlstrom, Daniel O.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Janicaud, Dominique. 2001. Jean-Luc Marion. Entretien du 3 décembre 1999. In Heidegger en France II. Entretiens, 210–227. Paris: Michel Albin.Google Scholar
  18. Kosky, Jeffrey. 2001. Levinas and the philosophy of religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1974. Autrement qu’être, ou au-delà de l’essence. La haye: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  20. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1993. Dieu, la mort et le temps. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
  21. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1996. Enigma and phenomenon. In Basic philosophical writings, ed. Anton Peperzak, Simon Critchley, and Robert Bernasconi, 65–78. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1998. Hermeneutics and beyond. In Of god who comes to mind (trans: Bergo, Bettina), 100–110. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Levinas, Emmanuel. 2000. God, death, and time (trans: Bergo, Bettina). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Levinas, Emmanuel. 2002a. Totality and infinity. An essay on exteriority (trans: Lingis, Alphonso). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Levinas, Emmanuel. 2002b. Otherwise than being, or beyond essence (trans: Lingis, Alphonso). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mabille, Bernard. 2004. Hegel, Heidegger et la métaphysique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  27. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1991. Sur la théologie blanche de Descartes. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  28. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1995. God without being. Hors Texte (trans: Carlson, Thomas A.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1998. Notes on the ontological indifference. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 20: 25–40.Google Scholar
  30. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1999a. On Descartes’ metaphysical prism. The constitution and the limits of onto-theo-logy in cartesian thought (trans: Kosky, Jeffrey). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1999b. Cartesian questions. Method and metaphysics (trans: Kosky, Jeffrey). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1999c. La science toujours recherchée et toujours manquante. In La métaphysique. Tome I. Son histoire, sa critique, ses enjeux, ed. Jean-Marc Narbonne and Luc Langlois, 13–36. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  33. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2001a. The Idol and distance. Five studies (trans: Carlson, Thomas A.). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2001b. La phénoménalité du sacrament: être et donation. Communio 26: 59–75.Google Scholar
  35. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2002a. Being given. Toward a phenomenology of givenness (trans: Kosky, Jeffrey). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2002b. In excess. Studies of saturated phenomena (trans: Horner, Robyn and Berraud, Vincent). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2002c. Dieu sans l’être. Hors-Texte. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  38. Marion, Jean-Luc, 2002d. Prolegomena to Charity (trans: Lewis, Stephen E.). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2003. Le phénomène érotique. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
  40. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2007a. On the ego and on god. Further cartesian questions (trans: Gschwandtner, Christina M.). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2007b. The erotic phenomenon (trans: Lewis, Stephen E.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2008a. The visible and the revealed (trans: Gschwandtner, Christina M. et al.) New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Marion, Jean-Luc. 2008b. Au lieu de soi. L’approche de Saint Augustin. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  44. Raffoul, François. 2004. A chaque fois mien. Heidegger et la question du sujet. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  45. Schrijvers, Joeri. 2006. Ontotheological Turnings? Levinas, Lacoste, and Marion on the decentering of modern subjectivity. Modern Theology 22: 221–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schrijvers, Joeri. 2007. ‘And there shall be no more boredom’. Problems with overcoming metaphysics in Heidegger, Levinas and Marion. In Transcendence and phenomenology, ed. Peter Candler and Conor Cunningham, 50–84. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  47. Schrijvers, Joeri. 2009. In place of (the) self. A critical study of Jean-Luc Marion’s Au lieu de soi. Modern Theology 25: 661–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schürmann, Reiner. 2003. Broken Hegemonies (trans: Lily, Reginald). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, James K.A. 2002. Speech and theology. Language and the logic of incarnation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, James K.A. 2004. Introducing radical orthodoxy. Mapping a post-secular theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
  51. Thomson, Iain. 2005. Heidegger on ontotheology. Technology and the politics of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO-V)LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations