Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 407–438 | Cite as

Ethics and gods: How is local ethics possible?

  • Tere VadÉn


One prominent interpretation of Heidegger’s thought on issues that are traditionally called “ethical” is that it gives us a formal description of how to reach authenticity (the early Heidegger) or how to gain a free relationship to technology (the late Heidegger) without stating any positive prescriptions. However, as Hubert L. Dreyfus (1995, 2000) has argued, there is more than pure formalism to Heidegger’s thought: he points again and again to how important rootedness, Boden and Heimat, are in trying to overcome the technological understanding of being. Notoriously, Heidegger sees a special role to the Greek–German linguistic axis in internally challenging the tradition of Western metaphysics. This putative special status is in an unsettling way connected to Heidegger’s antidemocratic ideas and to the “closedness” of the tradition that according to him is able to challenge the technological world. We will claim here that there is a way of opening up and thus, in a sense, democratizing the role of tradition and rootedness. However, this democatization has to be done without losing sight of the importance of positive content (as opposed to formal description) in overcoming technology. This opening up is connected to the idea of local gods in later Heidegger as interpreted by Dreyfus; however, the democratization comes at the price of making ethics local as opposed to universal.


Special Role Political Philosophy Pure Formalism Formal Description Technological World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borgmann, Albert, Crossing the Postmodern Divide (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  2. Carman, Taylor, “Must We Be Inauthentic?” in Wrathall and Malpas, 13–28.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, Carleton, “Getting Heidegger off the West Coast,” Inquiry 41 (1998): 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Derrida, Jacques, Of Spirit. Heidegger and the Question (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, John, Experience and Nature (New York: Dover, 1958).Google Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, Hubert, “Responses,” in Wrathall and Malpas, 305–341.Google Scholar
  7. Dreyfus, Hubert, “Heidegger on Gaining a Free Relation to Technology,” in Feenberg and Hannay, 97–107.Google Scholar
  8. Dreyfus, Hubert, “Heidegger on the Connection between Nihilism, Art, Technology, and Politics,” in The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, ed. Charles Guignon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 289–316.Google Scholar
  9. Dreyfus, Hubert, Being-in-the-World (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  10. Dreyfus, Hubert and John Haugeland, “Husserl and Heidegger: Philosophy’s Last Stand,” in Murray, 222–238.Google Scholar
  11. Dreyfus, Hubert and Charles Spinosa, “Highway Bridges and Feasts: Heidegger and Borgmann on How to Affirm Technology,” Man and World 30 (1997): 159–177.Google Scholar
  12. Dreyfus, Hubert and Spinosa, Charles, “Two Kinds of Antiessentialism and Their Consequences,” Critical Inquiry 22 (1996): 735–763.Google Scholar
  13. Feenberg, Andrew and Alastair Hannay, eds, Technology and the Politics of Knowledge (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  14. Feyerabend, Paul, The Conquest of Abundance, ed. Bert Terpstra (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  15. Hampshire, Stuart, Justice is Conflict (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  16. Haugeland, John, “Truth and Finitude. Heidegger’s Transcendental Existentialism,” in Wrathall and Malpas, 43–77.Google Scholar
  17. Havas, Randall, “The Significance of Autheticity,” in Wrathall and Malpas, 29–42.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, Martin, “Die Zeit des Weltbildes,” Gesamtausgabe 5, (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1977) [ZW].Google Scholar
  19. Heidegger, Martin, Über den Humanismus (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1949) [H].Google Scholar
  20. Heidegger, Martin, Einführung in die Metaphysik (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1953) [EM].Google Scholar
  21. Heidegger, Martin, Unterwegs zur Sprache (Pfullingen: Neske, 1959) [US].Google Scholar
  22. Heidegger, Martin, Gelassenheit, (Pfullingen: Neske, 1959).Google Scholar
  23. Heidegger, Martin, Poetry, Language, Thought, transl. Albert Hofstadter (New York: Harper and Row, 1971) [PLT].Google Scholar
  24. Heidegger, Martin, “Sprache und Heimat,” Gesamtausgabe 13 (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1983).Google Scholar
  25. Heidegger, Martin, Nietzsche, Vols. 1 and 2, trans. David Farrell Krell (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1991).Google Scholar
  26. Heidegger, Martin, Sein und Zeit, 16th ed. (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1993) [SuZ].Google Scholar
  27. Heidegger, Martin, “Only a God Can Save Us: Der Spiegel’s interview with Martin Heidegger,” in Wolin, 91–116.Google Scholar
  28. Heidegger, Martin, Zollikoner Seminare, ed. Medard Boss (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1994).Google Scholar
  29. Heidegger, Martin, Contributions to Philosophy: From Enowning, trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999) [CP].Google Scholar
  30. Krell, David Farrell, “Spiriting Heidegger,” in Of Derrida, Heidegger and Spirit, ed. David Wood (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  31. Krell, David Farrell, “Heidegger Nietzsche Nazism,” introduction to the paperback edition of Heidegger, Nietzsche, Vols. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
  32. May, Reinhard, Heidegger’s Hidden Sources, trans. Graham Parkes (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
  33. Murray, Michael, ed. Heidegger & Modern Philosophy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  34. Plotnitsky, Arkady, The Knowable and the Unknowable. Modern Science, Nonclassical Thought, and the “Two Cultures.” (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  35. Pöggeler, Otto, “Heideggers politisches Selbstverständnis,” in Heidegger und die praktische Philosophie, eds. Annemarie Gethmann-Siefert and Otto Pöggeler (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1988).Google Scholar
  36. Pöggeler, Otto, “Being as Appropriation,” in Murray, 84–115.Google Scholar
  37. Pylkkö, Pauli, The Aconceptual Mind. Heideggerian Themes in Holistic Naturalism (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1998).Google Scholar
  38. Rockmore, Tom, “Heidegger on Technology and Democracy,” in Feenberg and Hannay, 128–144.Google Scholar
  39. Vadén, Tere, “Qualifying Qualia through the Skyhook Test,” Inquiry 44 (2001): 149–170.Google Scholar
  40. Vadén, Tere and Mika Hannula, Rock the Boat. Localized Ethics, the Situated Self, and Particularism in Contemporary Art. Köln: Salon Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
  41. Wolin, Richard, ed. The Heidegger Controversy. A Critical Reader. (Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  42. von Krockow, Christian, Die Entscheidung. Eine Untersuchung über Ernst Jünger, Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger (Frankfurt: Campus, 1990) [1958].Google Scholar
  43. Wrathall, Mark, and Jeff Malpas, eds. Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity. Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Vol. 1 (Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  44. Young, Julian, “What is Dwelling? The Homelessness of Modernity and the Worlding of the World,” in Wrathall and Malpas, 187–203.Google Scholar
  45. Zimmerman, Michael, “The End of Authentic Selfhood in the Postmodern Age?” in Wrathall and Malpas, 123–148.Google Scholar
  46. Zizek, Slavoj, The Ticklish Subject. The Absent Centre of Political Ontology (London: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics Statistics, and Philosophy, Kanslerinrinne 1, 33014University of TampereFinland

Personalised recommendations