Advertisement

Letters in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 104, Issue 11, pp 1333–1364 | Cite as

T-Duality for Orientifolds and Twisted KR-Theory

  • Charles Doran
  • Stefan Méndez-Diez
  • Jonathan RosenbergEmail author
Article

Abstract

D-brane charges in orientifold string theories are classified by the KR-theory of Atiyah. However, this is assuming that all O-planes have the same sign. When there are O-planes of different signs, physics demands a “KR-theory with a sign choice” which up until now has not been studied by mathematicians (with the unique exception of Moutuou, who did not have a specific application in mind). We give a definition of this theory and compute it for orientifold theories compactified on S 1 and T 2. We also explain how and why additional “twisting” is implemented. We show that our results satisfy all possible T-duality relationships for orientifold string theories on elliptic curves, which will be studied further in subsequent work.

Keywords

orientifold O-plane KR-theory T-duality Chan–Paton bundle brane charge 

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 19L50 Secondary 19L47 81T30 19L64 19M05 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, J.F.: Stable Homotopy and Generalised Homology. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1974)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson D.W.: The real K-theory of classifying spaces. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 51(4), 634–636 (1964)CrossRefzbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atiyah M.F.: K-theory and reality. Q. J. Math. Oxf. Ser. 2(17), 367–386 (1966)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atiyah, M., Segal, G.: Twisted K-theory. Ukr. Mat. Visn. 1(3), 287–330 (2004). arXiv:math/0407054
  5. 5.
    Atiyah, M., Segal, G.: Twisted K-theory and cohomology. In: Inspired by S.S. Chern. Nankai Tracts Math., vol. 11, pp. 5–43. World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack (2006).arXiv:math/0510674
  6. 6.
    Bates, B., Doran, C., Schalm, K.: Crosscaps in Gepner models and the moduli space of T 2 orientifolds. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 11(5), 839–912 (2007).arXiv:hep-th/0612228
  7. 7.
    Bergman, O., Gimon, E.G., Horava, P.: Brane transfer operations and T-duality of non-BPS states. J. High Energy Phys. 1999(04), 010 (1999).arXiv:hep-th/9902160
  8. 8.
    Boersema, J.L.: Real C *-algebras, united K-theory, and the K ünneth formula. K-Theory 26(4), 345–402 (2002). arXiv:math/0208068
  9. 9.
    Bouwknegt, P., Evslin, J., Mathai, V.: T-duality: topology change from H-flux. Commun. Math. Phys. 249(2), 383–415 (2004). arXiv:hep-th/0306062
  10. 10.
    Braun, V., Schäfer-Nameki, S.: D-brane charges in Gepner models. J. Math. Phys. 47(9), 092304 (2006). arXiv:hep-th/0511100
  11. 11.
    Bunke, U., Rumpf, P., Schick, T.: The topology of T-duality for T n-bundles. Rev. Math. Phys. 18, 1103–1154 (2006). arXiv:math/0501487
  12. 12.
    Bunke, U., Schick, T.: On the topology of T-duality. Rev. Math. Phys. 17, 77–112 (2005). arXiv:math/0405132
  13. 13.
    Distler, J., Freed, D.S., Moore, G.W.: Orientifold précis. In: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory and Perturbative String Theory. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 83, pp. 159–172. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2011). arXiv:0906.0795
  14. 14.
    Donovan, P., Karoubi, M.: Graded Brauer groups and K-theory with local coefficients. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 38, 5–25 (1970). http://www.numdam.org/item?id=PMIHES_1970__38__5_0
  15. 15.
    Doran, C., Mendez-Diez, S., Rosenberg, J.: String theory on elliptic curve orientifolds and KR-theory. Commun. Math. Phys. (2014). arXiv:1402.4885
  16. 16.
    Dupont J.L.: Symplectic bundles and KR-theory. Math. Scand. 24, 27–30 (1969)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Evans, D.E., Gannon, T.: Modular invariants and twisted equivariant K-theory II: Dynkin diagram symmetries. J. K-Theory 8(2), 273–330 (2013). arXiv:1012.1634
  18. 18.
    Fujii, M.: K O-groups of projective spaces. Osaka J. Math. 4, 141–149 (1967)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao, D., Hori, K.: On the structure of the Chan–Paton factors for D-branes in type II orientifolds (2010, preprint). arXiv:1004.3972
  20. 20.
    Green P.S.: A cohomology theory based upon self-conjugacies of complex vector bundles. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 70, 522–524 (1964)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gukov, S.: K-theory, reality, and orientifolds. Commun. Math. Phys. 210, 621–639 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/9901042
  22. 22.
    Hori, K.: D-branes, T-duality, and index theory. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3, 281–342 (1999). hep-th/9902102
  23. 23.
    Karoubi, M.: K-theory. An introduction. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 226. Springer, Berlin (1978)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karoubi, M.: Twisted K-theory—old and new. In: K-Theory and Noncommutative Geometry. EMS Series of Congress Reports, pp. 117–149. European Mathematical Society, Zürich (2008). arXiv:math/0701789
  25. 25.
    Karoubi, M., Weibel, C.: Algebraic and real K-theory of real varieties. Topology 42(4), 715–742 (2003). arXiv:math/0509412
  26. 26.
    Keurentjes, A.: Orientifolds and twisted boundary conditions. Nucl. Phys. B 589, 440 (2000). arXiv:hep-th/0004073
  27. 27.
    Lawson, H.B. Jr., Michelsohn, M.-L.: Spin Geometry. Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 38. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1989)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mathai, V., Rosenberg, J.: T-duality for torus bundles with H-fluxes via noncommutative topology. II: the high-dimensional case and the T-duality group. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 10, 123–158 (2006). arXiv:hep-th/0508084
  29. 29.
    Minasian, R., Moore, G.W.: K-theory and Ramond–Ramond charge. J. High Energy Phys. 1997(11), 002 (1997). arXiv:hep-th/9710230
  30. 30.
    Moutuou, E.M.: Twistings of KR for Real groupoids (2011). arXiv:1110.6836
  31. 31.
    Moutuou, E.M.: Twisted groupoid KR-theory. PhD thesis, Université de Lorraine (2012). http://www.theses.fr/2012LORR0042 .
  32. 32.
    Moutuou, E.M.: Graded Brauer groups of a groupoid with involution. J. Funct. Anal. 266(5), 2689–2739 (2014). arXiv:1202.2057
  33. 33.
    Olsen, K., Szabo, R.J.: Constructing D-branes from K-theory. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3, 889–1025 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9907140
  34. 34.
    Pedrini, C., Weibel, C.: The higher K-theory of real curves. K-Theory 27(1), 1–31 (2002)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rosenberg, J.: Continuous-trace algebras from the bundle theoretic point of view. J. Aust. Math. Soc. Ser. A 47(3), 368–381 (1989)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sanderson B.J.: Immersions and embeddings of projective spaces. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc (3) 14, 137–153 (1964)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Witten, E.: D-branes and K-theory. J. High Energy Phys. 1998(12), 019 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9810188
  38. 38.
    Witten, E.: Toroidal compactification without vector structure. J. High Energy Phys. 1998(02), 006 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9712028
  39. 39.
    Witten, E.: Overview of K-theory applied to strings. In: Strings 2000. Proceedings of the International Superstrings Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, vol. 16, pp. 693–706 (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0007175

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Doran
    • 1
  • Stefan Méndez-Diez
    • 1
  • Jonathan Rosenberg
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical and Statistical SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations