Advertisement

Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 187–207 | Cite as

Quantification of Optimal Choices of Parameters in Lognormal Variational Data Assimilation and Their Chaotic Behavior

  • Steven J. FletcherEmail author
  • Anton J. Kliewer
  • Andrew S. Jones
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

An important property of variational-based data assimilation is the ability to define a functional formulation such that the minimum of that functional can be any state that is desired. Thus, it is possible to define cost functions such that the minimum of the background error component is the mean, median or the mode of a multivariate lognormal distribution, where, unlike the multivariate Gaussian distributions, these statistics are not equivalent. Therefore, for lognormal distributions it is shown here that there are regions where each one of these three statistics are optimal at minimizing the errors, given estimates of an a priori state. Also, as part of this work, a chaotic signal was detected with respect to the first guess to the Newton–Raphson solver that affect the accuracy of the solution to several decimal places.

Keywords

Lognormal variational data assimilation Mode Median Mean Newton–Raphson Newton fractals 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation award numbers #AGS-1038790 and #AGS-1738206.

References

  1. Cohn SE (1997) An introduction to estimation error theory. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 75:257–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fletcher SJ (2010) Mixed lognormal-Gaussian four-dimensional data assimilation. Tellus 62:266–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fletcher SJ (2017) Data assimilation for the geosciences: from theory to applications, 1st edn. Elsevier, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Fletcher SJ, Jones AS (2014) Multiplicative and additive incremental variational data assimilation for mixed lognormal and Gaussian errors. Mon Weather Rev 142:2521–2544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fletcher SJ, Zupanski M (2006a) A data assimilation method for log-normally distributed observational errors. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 132:2505–2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fletcher SJ, Zupanski M (2006b) A hybrid normal and lognormal distribution for data assimilation. Atmos Sci Lett 7:43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fletcher SJ, Zupanski M (2007) Implications and impacts of transforming lognormal variables into normal variables in VAR. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 16:755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gauthier P, Tanguay M, Laroche S, Pellering S, Morneau J (2007) Entension of a 3D-var to 4D-var: implementation of 4D-var at the meteorological service of Canada. Mon Weather Rev 135:2339–2354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta B (2013) Newton Raphson fractals: a review. Int J Emerg Trends Technol Comput Sci IJETTCS 2:119–123Google Scholar
  10. Kleist DT, Parrish DF, Derber JC, Treadon R, Wu W-S, Lord S (2009) Introduction of the GSI into the NCEP global data assimilation system. Weather Forecast 24:1691–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kliewer AJ, Fletcher SJ, Forsythe JM, Jones AS (2016) Application of mixed lognormal-Gaussian data assimilation techniques to synethic data with the CIRA 1-dimensional optimal estimation retrieval system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 142:274–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis JM, Derber JC (1985) The use of adjoints equations to solve a variational adjustment problem with advective contstraints. Tellus 73A:309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lorenc AC (1986) Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126:1177–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lorenc AC, Ballard SP, Bell RS, Ingleby NB, Andrews PLF, Barker DM, Bray JR, Clayton AM, Dalby T, Li D, Payne TJ, Saunders FW (2000) The Met. Office global three dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126:2991–3012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rabier F, Jarvinen H, Klinker E, Mahfouf J-F, Simmons A (2000) The ECMWF implementation of four dimensional variational assimilation. Part I: experimental results with simplified physics. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126A:1143–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rawlins F, Ballard SP, Bovis KJ, Clayton AM, Li D, Inverarity GW, Lorenc AC, Payne TJ (2007) The Met Office global four-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 133:347–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosmond T, Xu L (2006) Development of NAVDAS-AR: non-linear formulation and outer loop test. Tellus 58A:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Song H, Edwards CA, Moore AM, Fiechter J (2012) Incremental four-dimensional variational data assimilation of positive-definite oceanic variables using a logarithm transformation. Ocean Modell 54:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven J. Fletcher
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anton J. Kliewer
    • 1
  • Andrew S. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Cooperative Institute for Research in the AtmosphereColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations