Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 299–315

# Means and Covariance Functions for Geostatistical Compositional Data: an Axiomatic Approach

• Denis Allard
• Thierry Marchant
Article

## Abstract

This work focuses on the characterization of the central tendency of a sample of compositional data. It provides new results about theoretical properties of means and covariance functions for compositional data, with an axiomatic perspective. Original results that shed new light on geostatistical modeling of compositional data are presented. As a first result, it is shown that the weighted arithmetic mean is the only central tendency characteristic satisfying a small set of axioms, namely continuity, reflexivity, and marginal stability. Moreover, this set of axioms also implies that the weights must be identical for all parts of the composition. This result has deep consequences for spatial multivariate covariance modeling of compositional data. In a geostatistical setting, it is shown as a second result that the proportional model of covariance functions (i.e., the product of a covariance matrix and a single correlation function) is the only model that provides identical kriging weights for all components of the compositional data. As a consequence of these two results, the proportional model of covariance function is the only covariance model compatible with reflexivity and marginal stability.

## Keywords

Aitchison geometry Central tendency Functional equation Geostatistics Multivariate covariance function model

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

We are truly indebted to one Advisory Editor and to the Editor-in-Chief for their very constructive comments, which helped to improve this paper.

## References

1. Aczél J (1966) Lectures on functional equations and their applications. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
2. Aczél J, Dhombres J (1989) Functional equations in several variables. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. Aitchison J (1982) The statistical analysis of compositional data. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 44(2):139–177Google Scholar
4. Aitchison J (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall, London
5. Aitchison J (1989) Measures of location of compositional data sets. Math Geol 24(4):365–379
6. Arrow KL (1950) A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J Political Econ 58(4):328–346
7. Billheimer D, Guttorp P, Fagan WF (2001) Statistical interpretation of species composition. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1205–1214
8. Bogaert P (2002) Spatial prediction of categorical variables: the Bayesian maximum entropy approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk A 16:425–448
9. Chilès JP, Delfiner P (2012) Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty, 2nd edn. Wiley, London
10. Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data, Revised edn. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
11. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowksy-Glahn V (2011) Basic concepts and procedures. In: Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Buccianti A (eds) Compositional data analysis: theory and applications. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
12. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowksy-Glahn V, Figureas GM, Barceló-Vidal C (2003) Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Math Geol 35(3):279–300
13. Griva I, Nash SG, Sofer A (2009) Linear and nonlinear optimization, 2nd edn. SIAMGoogle Scholar
14. Helterbrand JD, Cressie N (1994) Universal cokriging under intrinsic coregionalization. Math Geol 26:205–226
15. Kolmogorov A (1930) Sur la notion de la moyenne. Atti R Accad Naz Lincei Mem Cl Sci Fis Mat Natur Sez 12:323–343Google Scholar
16. Liu RY, Parelius JM, Singh K (1999) Multivariate analysis by data depth: descriptive statistics, graphics and inference (with discussion and a rejoinder by Liu and Singh). Ann Stat 27(3):783–858
17. Mateu-Figueras G, Pawlowksy-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ (2011) The principle of working on coordinates. In: Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Buccianti A (eds) Compositional data analysis: theory and applications. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
18. Matkowski J (2010) Generalized weighted quasi-arithmetic means. Aequ Math 79:203–212
19. Miller WE (2002) Revisiting the geometry of a ternary diagram with the half-taxi metric. Math Geol 34(3):275–290
20. Pawlowksy-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ (2002) BLU estimators and compositional data. Math Geol 34(3):259–274
21. Pawlowksy-Glahn V, Olea RA (2004) Geostatistical analysis of compositional data. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
22. Scealy JL, Welsh AH (2014) Colours and cocktails: compositional data analysis 2013 Lancaster lecture. Aust NZ J Stat 56(2):145–169
23. Sharp WE (2006) The graph median—a stable alternative measure of central tendency for compositional data sets. Math Geol 38:221–229
24. Shurtz RF (2000) Comment on “Logratios and natural laws in compositional data analysis” by J Aitchison. Math Geol 32:645–647
25. Tolosana-Delgado R, van den Boogaart K, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2011) Geostatistics for compositions. In: Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Buccianti A (eds) Compositional data analysis: theory and applications. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
26. Vardi Y, Zhang CH (2000) The multivariate $$L_1$$-median and associated data depth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(4):1423–1426
27. Wackernagel H (2013) Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
28. Walvoort DJJ, de Gruijter JJ (2001) Compositional kriging: a spatial interpolation method for compositional data. Math Geol 33(8):951–966
29. Zuo Y, Serfling R (2000) General notions of statistical depth function. Ann Stat 28(2):461–482