Advertisement

Mathematical Geosciences

, 43:763 | Cite as

A Stochastic Object Model Conditioned to High-Quality Seismic Data

  • Anne Randi SyversveenEmail author
  • Ragnar Hauge
  • Jan Inge Tollefsrud
  • Ulf Lægreid
  • Alister MacDonald
Open Access
Article
  • 444 Downloads

Abstract

We present an approach for modeling facies bodies in which a highly constrained stochastic object model is used to integrate detailed seismic interpretation of the reservoir’s sedimentological architecture directly in a three-dimensional reservoir model. The approach fills the gap between the use of seismic data in a true deterministic sense, in which the facies body top and base are resolved and mapped directly, and stochastic methods in which the relationship between seismic attributes and facies is defined by conditional probabilities. The lateral geometry of the facies bodies is controlled by seismic interpretations on horizon slices or by direct body extraction, whereas facies body thickness and cross-sectional shape are defined by a mixture of seismic data, well data, and user defined object shapes. The stochastic terms in the model are used to incorporate local geometric variability, which is used to increase the geological realism of the facies bodies and allow for correct, flexible well conditioning. The result is a set of three-dimensional facies bodies that are constrained to the seismic interpretations and well data. Each body is defined as a parametric object that includes information such as location of the body axis, depositional direction, axis-to-margin normals, and external body geometry. The parametric information is useful for defining geologically realistic intrabody petrophysical trends and for controlling connectivity between stacked facies bodies.

Keywords

Facies modeling Seismic data Intrabody petrophysical trends 

References

  1. Deutsch C, Wang L (1996) Hierarchical object based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs. Math Geol 28:857–880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexions with graphs. Numer Math 1:269–271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hauge R, Syversveen AR, MacDonald A (2003) SPE 84053 modeling facies bodies and petrophysical trends in turbidite reservoirs. Presented at SPE ATCE, Denver, Colorado, USA 2003 Google Scholar
  4. Hauge R, Syversveen AR, MacDonald A (2006) Object models with vector steering. Math Geol 38(1):17–32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hauge R, Holden L, Syversveen AR (2007) Well conditioning in object models. Math Geol 39:383–398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holden L, Hauge R, Skare Ø, Skorstad A (1998) Modelling of fluvial reservoirs with object models. Math Geol 30:473–496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lia O, Tjelmeland H, Kjellesvik LE (1996) Modeling of facies architecture by marked point models. In: Baafi E, Schofield N (eds) Geostatistics Wollongong’96, vol 1. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 386–387 Google Scholar
  8. Rabelo IR, Luthi SM, van Vliet LJ (2007) Parameterization of meander-belt elements in high-resolution three-dimensional seismic data using the geotime cube and modern analogues. In: Seismic geomorphology: applications to hydrocarbon exploration and production. Special publications, vol 277. Geological Society, London, pp 121–137 Google Scholar
  9. Skare Ø, Skorstad A, Hauge R, Holden L (1996) Conditioning a fluvial model on seismic data. In: Baafi E, Schofield N (eds) Geostat Wollongong ’96, vol 1. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 465–476 Google Scholar
  10. Syversveen AR, Omre H (1997) Conditioning of marked point processes within a bayesian framework. Scand J Stat 24:341–352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Viseur S, Shtuka A, Mallet J-L (2001) Stochastic object-based simulation of channels constrained by high resolution seismic data. In: Proceedings from IAMG, Cancun, Mexico Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Randi Syversveen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ragnar Hauge
    • 1
  • Jan Inge Tollefsrud
    • 2
  • Ulf Lægreid
    • 3
  • Alister MacDonald
    • 4
  1. 1.Norwegian Computing CenterBlindern, OsloNorway
  2. 2.StatoilOsloNorway
  3. 3.Bayerngas Norway ASOsloNorway
  4. 4.Roxar Software Solutions ASLysakerNorway

Personalised recommendations