Mathematical Geosciences

, 43:611 | Cite as

Facies Modeling Using a Markov Mesh Model Specification

  • Marita StienEmail author
  • Odd Kolbjørnsen
Open Access


The spatial continuity of facies is one of the key factors controlling flow in reservoir models. Traditional pixel-based methods such as truncated Gaussian random fields and indicator simulation are based on only two-point statistics, which is insufficient to capture complex facies structures. Current methods for multi-point statistics either lack a consistent statistical model specification or are too computer intensive to be applicable. We propose a Markov mesh model based on generalized linear models for geological facies modeling. The approach defines a consistent statistical model that is facilitated by efficient estimation of model parameters and generation of realizations. Our presentation includes a formulation of the general framework, model specifications in two and three dimensions, and details on how the parameters can be estimated from a training image. We illustrate the method using multiple training images, including binary and trinary images and simulations in two and three dimensions. We also do a thorough comparison to the snesim approach. We find that the current model formulation is applicable for multiple training images and compares favorably to the snesim approach in our test examples. The method is highly memory efficient.


Sequential simulation Unilateral scan Generalized linear models 


  1. Abend K, Harley T, Kanal L (1965) Classification of binary random patterns. IEEE Trans Inf Theory IT-11:538–544 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cressie N, Davidson J (1998) Image analysis with partially ordered Markov models. Comput Stat Data Anal 29(1):1–26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daly C (2005) Higher order models using entropy, Markov random fields and sequential simulation, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 215–224 Google Scholar
  4. Damsleth E, Tjølsen C, Omre H, Haldorsen H (1992) A two-stage stochastic model applied to a north sea reservoir. SPE JPT 44(4):402–408 Google Scholar
  5. Guardiano, Srivastava (1993) Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments, vol 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 133–144 Google Scholar
  6. Kjønsberg H, Kolbjørnsen O (2008) Markov mesh simulations with data conditioning through indicator kriging, vol 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 257–266 Google Scholar
  7. Liu Y (2006) Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation. Comput Geosci 32:1544–1563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized linear models, 2 edn. Chapman and Hall, London Google Scholar
  9. Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J (2009) Applied geostatistics with SGeMS: a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  10. Skorstad A, Kolbjørnsen O, Fjellvoll B, Howell J (2005) Sensitivity of oil production to petrophysical heterogeneities. Springer, Dordrecht Google Scholar
  11. Soleng H, Syversveen A, Kolbjørnsen O (2006) Comparing facies realizations: Defining metrices on realization space. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference in Mathematics of Oil Recovery, p A014 Google Scholar
  12. Strebelle S (2000) In: Multivariate Geostatistics: Beyond Bivariate Moments, vol 1 Google Scholar
  13. Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34 Google Scholar
  14. Tjelmeland H, Besag J (1998) Markov random fields with higher-order interactions. Scand J Stat 25:415–433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Computing CenterBlindernNorway

Personalised recommendations