Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 243–259 | Cite as

Robust Resampling Confidence Intervals for Empirical Variograms



The variogram function is an important measure of the spatial dependencies of a geostatistical or other spatial dataset. It plays a central role in kriging, designing spatial studies, and in understanding the spatial properties of geological and environmental phenomena. It is therefore important to understand the variability attached to estimates of the variogram. Existing methods for constructing confidence intervals around the empirical variogram either rely on strong assumptions, such as normality or known variogram function, or are based on resampling blocks and subject to edge effect biases. This paper proposes two new procedures for addressing these concerns: a quasi-block-bootstrap and a quasi-block-jackknife. The new methods are based on transforming the data to decorrelate it based on a fitted variogram model, resampling blocks from the decorrelated data, and then recorrelating. The coverage properties of the new confidence intervals are compared by simulation to a number of existing resampling-based intervals. The proposed quasi-block-jackknife confidence interval is found to have the best properties of all of the methods considered across a range of scenarios, including normally and lognormally distributed data and misspecification of the variogram function used to decorrelate the data.


Spatial analysis Variograms Bootstrap Jackknife Block bootstrap Block jackknife 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chiles J-P, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics: Modelling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
  2. Clark RG, Allingham S (2010) Further simulation results on the robustness of resampling confidence intervals for empirical variograms. University of Wollongong Centre for Statistical and Survey Methodology Working Paper 02-10. and
  3. Cosh MH, Stedinger J, Brutsaert W (2003) Time changes in spatial structure of surface variability in the southern great plains. Adv Water Resour 26:407–415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
  5. Cressie N, Hawkins D (1980) Robust estimation of the variogram: I. Math Geol 12(2):115–125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davison A, Hinkley D (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  7. Dowd P (1984) The variogram and kriging: robust and resistant estimators. In: Geostatistics for natural resource characterization. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 91–106 Google Scholar
  8. Emery X (2007) Reducing fluctuations in the sample variogram. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21(4):391–403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garrigues S, Allard D, Baret F, Weiss M (2006) Quantifying spatial heterogeneity at the landscape scale using variogram models. Remote Sens Environ 103:81–96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gascuel-Odoux C, Boivin P (1994) Variability of variograms and spatial estimates due to soil sampling: a case study. Geoderma 62:165–182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall P (1985) Resampling a coverage pattern. Stoch Process Appl 20:231–246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huisman J, Snepvangers J, Bouten W, Heuvelink G (2003) Monitoring temporal development of spatial soil water content variation: comparison of ground penetrating radar and time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone J 2(4):519–529 Google Scholar
  13. Kunsch HR (1989) The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann Math Stat 17(3):1217–1241 Google Scholar
  14. Lahiri S (2003) Resampling methods for dependent data. Springer, New York Google Scholar
  15. Lark RM (2000) A comparison of some robust estimators of the variogram for use in soil survey. Eur J Soil Sci 51:137–157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marchant B, Lark R (2004) Estimating variogram uncertainty. Math Geol 36(8):867–898 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matheron G (1963) Geostatistics. Econ Geol 58(2):1246–1266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oliver M, Webster R (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester Google Scholar
  19. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Google Scholar
  20. Schlather M (2006) RandomFields: Simulation and analysis of random fields. R package version 1.3.29 Google Scholar
  21. Sebastyén Z (2004) Uncertainty investigation of the semivariogram by means of the bootstrap method. Acta Geol Hung 47(1):83–91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shafer J, Varljen M (1990) Approximation of confidence limits on sample semivariograms from single realizations of spatially correlated random fields. Water Resour Res 26(8):1787–1802 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Solow A (1985) Bootstrapping correlated data. Math Geol 17(7):769–775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tang L, Schucany W, Woodward W, Gunst R (2006) A parametric spatial bootstrap. Technical Report SMU-TR-337, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas Google Scholar
  25. Wang L, Okin GS, Caylor KK, Macko SA (2009) Spatial heterogeneity and sources of soil carbon in southern African savannas. Geoderma 149:402–408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wingle W, Poeter E (1993) Uncertainty associated with semivariograms used for site simulation. Ground Water 31(5):365–376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Statistical and Survey MethodologyUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Health Services DevelopmentUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations