Benford’s Law Applied to Hydrology Data—Results and Relevance to Other Geophysical Data
- 291 Downloads
Benford’s Law gives the expected frequencies of the digits in tabulated data and asserts that the lower digits (1, 2, and 3) are expected to occur more frequently than the higher digits. This study tested whether the law applied to two large earth science data sets. The first test analyzed streamflow statistics and the finding was a close conformity to Benford’s Law. The second test analyzed the sizes of lakes and wetlands, and the finding was that the data did not conform to Benford’s Law. Further analysis showed that the lake and wetland data followed a power law. The expected digit frequencies for data following a power law were derived, and the lake data had a close fit to these expected digit frequencies.
The use of Benford’s Law could serve as a quality check for streamflow data subsets, perhaps related to time or geographical area. Also, with the importance of lakes as essential components of the water cycle, either Benford’s Law or the expected digit frequencies of data following a power law could be used as an authenticity and validity check on future databases dealing with water bodies. We give several applications and avenues for future research, including an assessment of whether the digit frequencies of data could be used to derive the power law exponent, and whether the digit frequencies could be used to verify the range over which a power law applies. Our results indicate that data related to water bodies should conform to Benford’s Law and that nonconformity could be indicators of (a) an incomplete data set, (b) the sample not being representative of the population, (c) excessive rounding of the data, (d) data errors, inconsistencies, or anomalies, and/or (e) conformity to a power law with a large exponent.
KeywordsData integrity Hydrographic statistics Hydrometric statistics Streamflow analysis Power law exponent
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Benford F (1938) The law of anomalous numbers. Proc Am Philos Soc 78(4):551–572 Google Scholar
- DeGroot M, Schervish M (2002) Probability and statistics, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading Google Scholar
- Diaconis P (1976) The distribution of leading digits and uniform distribution mod 1. Ann Probab 5(1):72–81 Google Scholar
- Leemis LM, Schmeiser BW, Evans DL (2000) Survival distributions satisfying Benford’s Law. Am Stat 54(3):1–6 Google Scholar
- Nigrini MJ (1996) A taxpayer compliance application of Benford’s Law. J Am Tax Assoc 18:72–91 Google Scholar
- Nigrini MJ (2005) An assessment of the change in the incidence of earnings management around the Enron–Andersen episode. Rev Account Financ 4(1):92–110 Google Scholar
- Nigrini MJ, Mittermaier LJ (1997) The use of Benford’s Law as an aid in analytical procedures: Auditing. J Pract Theory 16(2):52–67 Google Scholar
- Pinkham RS (1961) On the distribution of first significant digits. Ann Math Stat 32(4):1223–1230 Google Scholar
- The Economist (2006) Scientific fraud: Egg on his face, 5 January 2006 Google Scholar
- Wallace WA (2002) Assessing the quality of data used for benchmarking and decision-making. J Gov Financ Manag 51(3):16–22 Google Scholar