Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, 38:871 | Cite as

Computational Methods for the Determination of Roundness of Sedimentary Particles

  • Günther R. DrevinEmail author
Article

Abstract

A number of subjective and objective methods have been proposed to determine the roundness of rock particles, roundness being one of three properties describing the shape of a particle.

Methods that make use of the Fourier transform of the polar coordinates of particles’ edge elements are proposed in this paper. Lowpass filters are used to smooth the profiles of rock particle, roundness is then determined from the differences between the original and smooth profiles. Further methods that are proposed make use of different measures of inequality to quantify the distribution of the energy among the transform coefficients of the profiles of rock particles. These values are then used to determine the roundness of the particles. Entropy and Emlen’s modified entropy are the measures of inequality that are used. Different methods of determining the centre point of a particle and different methods to interpolate the edge elements are compared. The sensitivity of the methods to different resolutions is also investigated.

The results obtained with the proposed methods are comparable to those obtained with an existing Fourier transform based method, however it is shown that the proposed methods are computationally less demanding. It is also shown that the proposed methods are better than the existing method when the comparison is based on the correlation between the mean roundness of samples of particles and the actual roundness of the particles.

Keywords

Fourier transform entropy Emlen’s modified entropy Kullback–Leibler distance. 

References

  1. Barrett, P. J., 1980, The shape of rock particles, a critical review: Sedimentology, v. 27, no. 3, p. 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brink, A. D., and Pendock, N. E., 1996, Minimum cross-entropy threshold selection: Pattern Recognition, v. 29, no. 1, p. 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, M. W., 1987, Image analysis of clastic particles, in Marshall, J. R., ed., Clastic Particles: Scanning Electron Microscopy and Shape Analysis of Sedimentary and Volcanic Clasts: Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, p. 256–266.Google Scholar
  4. Diepenbroek, M., Bartholomä, A., and Ibbeken, H., 1992, How round is round? A new approach to the topic ‘roundness’ by Fourier grain shape analysis: Sedimentology, v. 39, no. 3, p. 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drevin, G. R., 1999, The Development of the Matrix Method for the Determination of Riometer Quiet Day Curves: unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 128 p.Google Scholar
  6. Drevin, G. R., and Stoker, P. H., 2003, Determining Riometer Quiet Day Curves 2. Derivation of Filter Cutoff Frequencies: Radio Science, v. 38, no. 2, doi:10.1029/2001RS002538.Google Scholar
  7. Ehrlich, R., and Weinberg, B., 1970, An exact method for characterization of grain shape: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 40, no. 1, p. 205–212.Google Scholar
  8. Full, W. E., and Ehrlich, R., 1982, Some approaches for location of centroids of quartz grain outlines to increase homology between Fourier amplitude spectra: Mathematical Geology, v. 14, no. 1, p. 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goel, P., and Vidakovic, B., 1995, Wavelet transformations as diversity enhancers: Discussion Paper 95-04, Inst. Stat. and Dec. Sci, Duke University.Google Scholar
  10. Jarvis, R. S., 1976, Classification of nested tributary basins in analysis of drainage basin shape: Water Resources Research, v. 12, no. 6, p. 1151–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krumbein, W. C., 1941a, The effect of abrasion on the size, shape and roundness of rock fragments: Journal of Geology, v. 49, no. 5, p. 482–520.Google Scholar
  12. Krumbein, W. C., 1941b, Measurement and geological significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 11, no. 2, p. 64–72.Google Scholar
  13. Kullback, S., and Leibler, R. A., 1951, On information and sufficiency: Annals of Mathematical Statistics, v. 22, no. 1, p.79–86.Google Scholar
  14. Powers, M. C., 1953, A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 23, no. 2, p. 117–119.Google Scholar
  15. Schwarcz, H. P., and Shane, K. C., 1969, Measurement of particle shape by Fourier analysis: Sedimentology, v. 13, no. 3/4, p. 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W., 1949, The Mathematical Theory of Communication: University of Illinois Press, 117 p.Google Scholar
  17. Trucco, E., and Verri, A., 1998, Introductory Techniques for 3-D Computer Vision: Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 343 p.Google Scholar
  18. Wadell, H., 1932, Volume, shape and roundness of rock particles: Journal of Geology, v. 40, no. 5, p. 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing ScienceMiddlesex UniversityLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, School for Computer, Statistical and Mathematical SciencesNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroomSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations