Advertisement

Materials Science

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 279–285 | Cite as

Influence of the External Polarization Potential on the Tribocorrosion Behavior of 08Kh18N10T Steel

  • V. I. Pokhmurs’kyi
  • M. S. Khoma
  • V. A. Vynar
  • Kh. B. Vasyliv
  • N. B. Rats’ka
Article
  • 12 Downloads

We study the influence of external polarization with different potentials on the tribocorrosion behavior of 08Kh18N10T steel in contact with a corundum ball in a 3% NaCl solution. It is shown that the mechanical factor shifts the potential of pitting formation to the negative side by 0.17 V as compared with the surface without friction. The running-in time, friction coefficient, and material losses in the process of tribocorrosion qualitatively correlate with each other and depend on the applied electrode potential. It is shown that hydrogen released in the contact zone under the conditions of cathodic polarization embrittles the surface layers participating in the contact interaction. Moreover, hydrogen reduces oxide films and prevents their rapid formation on steel, which intensifies its wear. In addition, hydrogen facilitates deformation and increases the deformation zone near the friction track. Under the anodic polarization, we observe an increase in the number of pits in the friction area.

Keywords

polarization steel tribocorrosion deformation pits 

References

  1. 1.
    Yu. G. Sukhenko, O. I. Nekoz, and M. S. Stechyshyn, Technological Methods of Guaranteeing the Durability of Equipment of the Food Industry [in Ukrainian], Eleron, Kiev (1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. S. Jellesen, L. R. Hilbert, and P. І. Moller, “Tribocorrosion in the food industry,” in: Proc. of Eurocorrosion 2007, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, September 9–13 (2007), CD-ROM, Paper No. 1259.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. M. Sorokin, A. P. Efremov, and L. S. Saakyan, Corrosion-Mechanical Wear of Steels and Alloys [in Russian], Neft’ i Gas, Moscow (2002).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Landolt, S. Mischler, and M. Stemp, “Electrochemical methods in tribocorrosion: a critical appraisal,” Electrochim. Acta, 46, 3913–3929 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. A. Preis and A. G. Dzyub, “Electrochemical phenomena in the friction of metals,” Tren. Iznos, 1, No. 2, 217–235 (1980).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. I. Pokhmurs’kyi and V. M. Dovhunyk, “Tribocorrosion of stainless steels (Review),” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., 46, No. 1, 76–85 (2010); English translation : Mater. Sci., 46, No. 1, 87–96 (2010).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. T. Mathew, E. Ariza, L. A. Rocha, A. C. Fernandes, and F. Vaz, “TiCxOy thin films for decorative applications: Tribocorrosion mechanisms and synergism,” Tribology Int., 41, 603–615 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Mischler, S. Debaud, and D. Landolt, “Wear accelerated corrosion of passive metals in tribocorrosion systems,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 145, 750–758 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Bidiville, M. Favero, P. Stadelmann, and S. Mischler, “Effect of surface chemistry on the mechanical response of metals in sliding tribocorrosion systems,” Wear, 263, 207–217 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.-P. Celis, P. Pontiaux, and F. Wenger, “Tribocorrosion of materials: interplay between chemical, electrochemical, and mechanical reactivity of surfaces,” Wear, 261, 939–946 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.-Q. Wu and J.-P. Celis, “Electrochemical noise measurements on stainless steel during corrosion-wear in sliding contacts,” Wear, 256, 480–490 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. J. K. Wood and A. J. Speyer, “Erosion–corrosion of candidate HVOF aluminum-based marine coatings,” Wear, 256, 545–556 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Stojadinovic, S. Mischler, D. Bouvet, and M. Declercq, “Tribocorrosion of tungsten: effect of potential on wear,” Tribol. Industry, 29, Nos. 1/2, 41-44 (2007).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Favero, P. Stadelmann, and S. Mischler, “Effect of the applied potential of the near surface microstructure of a 316 steel submitted to tribocorrosion in sulfuric acid,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 39, 3175–3183 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Chen, J. Wang, F. Yan, Q. Zhang, and Q. Li, “Effect of applied potential on the tribocorrosion behaviors of Monel K500 alloy in artificial seawater,” Tribology Int., 81, 1–8 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. A. Vynar, V. M. Dovhunyk, and M. M. Student, “Methodical specific features of tribocorrosion investigations,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., 46, No. 5, 59–64 (2010); English translation : Mater. Sci., 46, No. 5, 633–639 (2011).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Zhang, X. Yin, J. Wang, and F. Yan, “Influence of potentials on the tribocorrosion behavior of 304SS in artificial seawater,” Royal Soc. Chem. Adv., No. 4, 55752–55759 (2014).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. I. Pokhmurs’kyi
    • 1
  • M. S. Khoma
    • 1
  • V. A. Vynar
    • 1
  • Kh. B. Vasyliv
    • 1
  • N. B. Rats’ka
    • 1
  1. 1.Karpenko Physicomechanical InstituteUkrainian National Academy of SciencesLvivUkraine

Personalised recommendations