Marketing Letters

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 103–113 | Cite as

Managing sub-branding affect transfer: the role of consideration set size and brand loyalty

  • Yi HeEmail author
  • Qimei Chen
  • Leona Tam
  • Ruby P. Lee


Although the essential role of affect transfer has been evidenced in the brand extension literature, scant research has focused on affect transfer when a firm attempts to add sub-brands into its brand portfolio. We conducted a series of four experiments to demonstrate that affect associated with a family brand does in fact transfer to its sub-brand, and the effect is more pronounced for a sub-brand that is closer to (vs distant from) its family brand. Further, the transfer of affect is contingent upon consideration set size and brand loyalty. While affect transfer is observed when consideration set is small, this effect dissipates when consideration set expands; such moderation effect further interacts with consumers’ loyalty to a family brand and a competing brand. Our findings caution brand managers to take into account consumers’ consideration set size and brand loyalty when managing their brand portfolios.


Sub-branding Affect transfer Consideration set Brand loyalty 


  1. Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. A. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boisvert, J. (2011). Conceptualization and modeling of the process behind brand association transfer. International Journal of Market Research, 53(4), 541–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, R. E., & Curry, D. J. (2013). Perceptions versus performance when managing extensions: new evidence about the role of fit between a parent brand and an extension. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaudhuri, A., & Morri, B. H. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heath, T. B., DelVecchio, D., & McCarthy, M. S. (2011). The asymmetric effects of extending brands to lower and higher quality. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herr, P. M., Farquhar, P. H., & Fazio, R. H. (1996). Impact of dominance and relatedness on brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(2), 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janiszewski, C., & Chandon, E. (2007). Transfer-appropriate processing, response fluency, and the mere measurement effect. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jensen, J. M., & Hansen, T. (2006). An empirical examination of brand loyalty. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 15(7), 442–449.Google Scholar
  12. Keller, K. L. (2008). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(5), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keller, K. L., & Sood, S. (2003). Brand equity dilution. Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 12–15.Google Scholar
  15. Kirmani, A. S., Sood, S., & Bridges, S. (1999). The ownership effect in consumer responses to brand line stretches. Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Loken, B., Joiner, C., & Peck, J. (2002). Category attitude measures: exemplars as inputs. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Milberg, S. J., Park, W. C., & McCarthy, M. S. (1997). Managing negative feedback effects associated with brand extensions: the impact of alternative branding strategies. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(2), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitra, A., & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1995). Toward a reconciliation of market power and information theories of advertising effects on price elasticity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 644–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. (2009). Brand portfolio strategy and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oakley, J. L., Duhachek, A., Balachander, S., & Sriram, S. (2008). Order of entry and the moderating role of comparison brands in brand extension evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 706–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Sambandam, R., & Lord, K. R. (1995). Switching behavior in automobile markets: a consideration-sets model. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Samu, S., & Krishnan, H. S. (2010). Brand related information as context: the impact of brand name characteristics on memory and choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(4), 456–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Terech, A., Bucklin, R., &Morrison, D. (2009). Consideration, choice and classifying loyalty. Working Paper, The Anderson Graduate School of Management at UCLA.Google Scholar
  26. Terui, N., Ban, M., & Allenby, G. M. (2011). The effect of media advertising on brand consideration and choice. Marketing Science, 30(1), 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thompson, D. V., & Hamilton, R. W. (2006). The effects of information processing mode on consumers' responses to comparative advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 530–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Nierop, E., Bronnenberg, B., Paap, R., Wedel, M., & Franses, P. H. (2010). Retrieving unobserved consideration sets from household panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zimmerman, I., Redker, C., & Gibson, B. (2011). The role of faith in intuition, need for cognition and method of attitude formation in implicit–explicit brand attitude relationship strength. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(3), 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business and EconomicsCalifornia State University, East BayHaywardUSA
  2. 2.Shidler College of BusinessUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA
  3. 3.Sydney Business SchoolUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Marketing, College of BusinessThe Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations