Advertisement

Marketing Letters

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 123–138 | Cite as

Ingredient branding and feedback effects: The impact of product outcomes, initial parent brand strength asymmetry, and parent brand role

  • Jeffrey P. RadighieriEmail author
  • Babu John Mariadoss
  • Yany Grégoire
  • Jean L. Johnson
Article

Abstract

Ingredient branding is a popular strategy involving two “parent” brands developing a co-branded product, called an ingredient branding offering (IBO). Drawing on extant brand literatures, we investigate how brand feedback effects are influenced by (1) the initial brand strength among the parent brands (low vs. high), (2) parent brand roles (whether the brand is the host or ingredient), and (3) IBO success and failure. Three experiments indicate that IBO success positively affects both parent brands, but the positive feedback is much more substantial for the weaker (vs. the stronger) brand. Under the failure condition, the strong ingredient brand is the only parent that is somewhat protected from an IBO failure. All the other IBO possibilities—in terms of brand strength and parent role—suffer from substantial negative feedback and share a high level of responsibility for the failure. Managerial and theoretical implications are drawn from these results.

Keywords

Ingredient branding Brand alliance Feedback Brand failure Associations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Washington State University Department of Marketing, Kelly D. Martin, Pingsheng Tong, Jeffrey Joireman, and Brian Gillespie for their assistance and valuable comments on previous drafts of this manuscript.

References

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahluwalia, R., & Gurhan-Canli, Z. (2000). The effects of extensions on the family brand name: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allred, K. G. (1999). Anger driven retaliation: Toward an understanding of impassioned conflict in organizations. In R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (pp. 27–58). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Balachander, S., & Ghose, S. (2003). Reciprocal spillover effects: a strategic benefit of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barone, M. J., Miniard, P. W., & Romeo, J. B. (2000). The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, M. (1987). Effects of framing on evaluation of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1993). Assignment of credit and blame for performance outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: the moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desai, K. K., & Keller, K. L. (2002). The effects of ingredient branding strategies on host brand extendibility. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 204–243). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153–179). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Fincham, F. D., & Jaspers, J. M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 81–138). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Ganzach, Y., & Karsahi, N. (1995). Message framing and buying behavior: a field experiment. Journal of Business Research, 32(1), 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson, D. E., & Schroeder, S. J. (2003). Who ought to be blamed? The effect of organizational roles on blame and credit attributions. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14(2), 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, V. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41(4), 316–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamilton, V. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Kushler, R. H. (1988). A question of standards: attributions of blame and credit for classroom acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Homburg, C., Hoyer, W., & Koschate, N. (2005). Customers’ reactions to price increases: do customer satisfaction and perceived motive fairness matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, E. J., & Russo, J. E. (1984). Product familiarity and learning new information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 542–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller, K. L., & Sood, S. (2003). Brand equity dilution. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 12–15.Google Scholar
  25. Lehmann, D. R., Keller, K. L., & Farley, J. U. (2008). The structure of survey based brand metrics. Journal of International Marketing, 16(4), 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loken, B., & John, D. R. (1993). Diluting brand beliefs: when do brand extensions have a negative impact? Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Milberg, S. J., Park, C. W., & McCarthy, M. S. (1997). Managing negative feedback effects associated with brand extensions: the impact of alternative branding strategies. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(2), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Park, C. W., Jun, S. Y., & Shocker, A. D. (1996). Composite branding alliances: an investigation of extension and feedback effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(4), 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ratneshwar, S., Shocker, A. D., & Stewart, D. W. (1987). Toward understanding the attraction effect: the implications of product stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodrigue, C. S., & Biswas, A. (2004). Brand alliance dependency and exclusivity: an empirical investigation. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(7), 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Romeo, J. B. (1991). The Effect of Negative Information on the Evaluations of Brand Extensions and the Family Brand. Paper presented at the Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UTGoogle Scholar
  32. Simonin, B. L., & Ruth, J. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swaminathan, V., Fox, R. J., & Reddy, S. K. (2001). The impact of brand extension introduction on choice. Journal of Marketing, 65, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vaidyanathan, R., & Aggarwal, P. (2000). Strategic brand alliances: implications of ingredient branding for national and private label brands. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(4), 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Venkatesh, R., & Mahajan, V. (1997). Products with branded components: an approach for premium pricing and partner selection. Marketing Science, 16(2), 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Voss, K. E., & Gammoh, B. S. (2004). Building brands through brand alliances: does a second ally help? Marketing Letters, 15(2/3), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Votolato, N. L., & Unnava, H. R. (2006). Spillover of negative information on brand alliances. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Washburn, J. H., Till, B. D., & Priluck, R. (2000). Co-branding: brand equity and trial effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(6/7), 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang, S., & Sood, S. (2002). Deep and surface cues: brand extension evaluations by children and adults. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey P. Radighieri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Babu John Mariadoss
    • 2
  • Yany Grégoire
    • 3
  • Jean L. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.Marketing Department, School of Business AdministrationUniversity of Houston-VictoriaSugar LandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marketing, College of BusinessWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  3. 3.Department of MarketingHEC MontréalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations