Advertising for extensions: Moderating effects of extension type, advertising strategy, and product category involvement on extension evaluation
- 1k Downloads
This paper investigates how advertisements for extensions contribute to consumers’ attitudes towards new line and brand extensions of highly familiar brands. We investigate the relative importance of attitude toward the advertisement (Aad), parent brand quality, and fit between the extension and the parent brand for extension evaluations with a sample of 754 Belgians. Hierarchical regressions showed that Aad is the major influencer of extension evaluation. The importance of Aad, quality, and fit on extension evaluation is moderated by extension type (line or brand extension), advertising strategy (informational, positive emotional, negative emotional), and product involvement (low or high involvement). Quality transfer from the parent brand was more outspoken for line than for brand extensions; Aad was relatively more important for low product involvement and fit for high involvement conditions. Informational appeals, compared to emotional appeals, reduced the effects of parent brand quality and fit, but Aad was all the more important.
KeywordsAdvertising Aad Line extension Brand extension Involvement
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support of the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen). We would also like to acknowledge the support of Insites Consulting in the data collection process and Think.BBDO for the development of the advertising stimuli.
- De Pelsmacker, P., Geuens, M., & Van den Bergh, J. (2007). Marketing communications. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition, volume 1: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 167–203). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Janssens, W., Wijnen, K., De Pelsmacker, P., & Van Kenhove, P. (2008). Marketing research with SPSS. London, UK: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Lai, M. (2006). The impacts of the brand strategies of new products on consumers’ behaviors. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Research in Advertising, Bath, UK.Google Scholar
- Nkwocha, I., Bao, Y., Johnson, W. C., & Brotspies, H. V. (2005). Product fit and consumer attitude toward brand extensions: the moderating role of product involvement. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 13(3), 49–61.Google Scholar
- Park, J.-W., & Kim, K.-H. (2001). Role of consumer relationships with a brand in brand extensions: some exploratory findings. Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1), 179–185.Google Scholar
- Patro, S. K., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2003). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions: evidence from India. Journal of the Academy of Business and Economics, 1, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Strathman, A. J., & Priester, J. R. (2005). To think or not to think? Exploring two routes to persuasion. In T. C. Brock & M. C. Green (Eds.), Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives (pp. 81–116). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rossiter, J. R., Percy, L., & Donovan, R. J. (1991). A better advertising planning grid. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(5), 11–21.Google Scholar
- Taylor, D. (2005). Brand stretch - why 1 in 2 extensions fail, and how to beat the odds: a brandgym workout. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wing, H. (2004). Brand extension is not a low risk option that firms think it is. Media Asia, p. 11.Google Scholar