Marketing Letters

, Volume 19, Issue 3–4, pp 399–416 | Cite as

Discrete choice models of firms’ strategic decisions

  • Michaela Draganska
  • Sanjog Misra
  • Victor Aguirregabiria
  • Pat Bajari
  • Liran Einav
  • Paul Ellickson
  • Dan Horsky
  • Sridhar Narayanan
  • Yesim Orhun
  • Peter Reiss
  • Katja Seim
  • Vishal Singh
  • Raphael Thomadsen
  • Ting Zhu
Article

Abstract

This paper outlines the methods and applications related to the nascent area of empirical discrete games in marketing. Many key strategic decisions firms make involve discrete choices such as deciding the location of a new store, determining where in product space to position a product, or what options to offer in a service contract. These decisions are fairly complex and typically involve the consideration of a number of demand, cost, and competitive factors. What makes these discrete choices particularly interesting (and challenging to analyze) is that they are interrelated with the choices of other firms because firms take into account the actions of their competitors when making their own decisions. We describe the basic problem of dealing with interrelated discrete choices in a game-theoretic framework and present the various estimation methods available. A discussion of the existing applications and future research opportunities concludes the article.

Keywords

Empirical discrete games Market entry Discrete choice Marketing 

References

  1. Aguirregabiria, V., & Ho, C.-Y. (2006). A dynamic oligopoly game of the U.S. airline industry: Estimation and policy experiments. Working paper, Boston University.Google Scholar
  2. Aguirregabiria, V., & Mira, P. (2007). Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica, 75(1), 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bajari, P., Benkard, L., & Levin, J. (2007). Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica, 75(5), 1331–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bajari, P., Hong, H., Krainer, J., & Nekipelov, D. (2006). Estimating static models of strategic interaction. NBER working paper no. W12013.Google Scholar
  5. Bajari, P., Hong, H., & Ryan, S. (2007). Identification and estimation of a discrete game of complete information. Technical report, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, S. (1992). Estimation of a model of entry in the airline industry. Econometrica, 60(4), 889–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, S., & Reiss, P. (2007). Empirical models of entry and market structure. In M. Armstrong & R. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 3, pp. 1845–1886). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, S., Ostrovsky, M., & Pakes, A. (2007). Simple estimators for the parameters of discrete dynamic games (with entry/exit examples). RAND Journal of Economics, 38, 373–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bresnahan, T., & Reiss, P. (1987). Do entry conditions vary across markets? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3), 833–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bresnahan, T., & Reiss, P. (1991a). Empirical models of discrete games. Journal of Econometrics, 48(1), 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bresnahan, T., & Reiss, P. (1991b). Entry and competition in concentrated markets. Journal of Political Economy, 99(51), 977–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciliberto, F., & Tamer, E. (2006). Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  13. Collard-Wexler, A. (2005). Plant turnover and demand fluctuations in the ready-mix concrete industry. Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business.Google Scholar
  14. Doraszelski, U., & Pakes, A. (2007). A framework for applied dynamic analysis in IO. In M. Armstrong & R. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 3, pp. 1887–1966). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  15. Draganska, M., Mazzeo, M., & Seim, K. (2007). Beyond plain vanilla: Modeling product assortment choices in the ice cream market. Working paper, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  16. Dunne, T., Klimek, S., Roberts, M., & Xu, Y. (2006). Entry and exit in geographic markets. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  17. Economides, N., Seim, K., & Viard, B. (2004). Quantifying the benefits of entry into local phone service. NET institute working paper 05-08.Google Scholar
  18. Einav, L. (2003). Not all rivals look alike: Estimating an equilibrium model of the release date timing game. Working paper, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  19. Ellickson, P., & Misra, S. (2007a). Enriching interactions: Incorporating revenue and cost data into static discrete games. Working paper, Duke University.Google Scholar
  20. Ellickson, P., & Misra, S. (2007b). Supermarket pricing strategies. Working paper, Duke University.Google Scholar
  21. Grubb, M. (2007). Selling to overconfident consumers. Technical report, MIT Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
  22. Horsky, D., Misra, S., & Nelson, P. (2007). Competitive positioning and pricing of brand lines. Working paper, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  23. Horsky, D., & Nelson, P. (1992). New brand positioning and pricing in an oligopolistic market. Marketing Science, 11(2), 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jia, P. (2006). What happens when Walmart comes to town: An empirical analysis of the discount retailing industry. Technical report, MIT.Google Scholar
  25. Judd, K., & Su, C.-L. (2007). Constrained optimization approaches to estimation of structural models. Working paper, Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
  26. Lambrecht, A., Seim, K., & Skiera, B. (2007). Does uncertainty matter? Consumer behavior under three-part tariffs. Marketing Science, 26, 698–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazzeo, M. (2002a). Competitive outcomes in product-differentiated oligopoly. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 716–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazzeo, M. (2002b). Product choice and oligopoly market structure. RAND Journal of Economics, 33, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miravete, E. (2002). Estimation demand for local telephone service with asymmetric information and optional calling plans. Review of Economic Studies, 69, 943–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miravete, E., & Roller, L.-H. (2004). Competitive nonlinear pricing in duopoly equilibrium: The early US cellular telephone industry. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  31. Narayanan, S., Chintagunta, P., & Miravete, E. (2007). The role of self selection, usage uncertainty and learning in the demand for local telephone service. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Orazem, P., & Xiao, M. (2006). Do entry conditions vary over time? Entry and competition in the broadband market: 1999-2003. Working paper, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  33. Orhun, Y. (2006). Spatial differentiation in the supermarket industry. Working paper, GSB Chicago.Google Scholar
  34. Pesendorfer, M., & Schmidt-Dengler, P. (2003). Identification and estimation of dynamic games. Working paper no. 9726, NBER, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  35. Reiss, P. C., & Spiller, P. T. (1989). Competition and entry in small airline markets. Journal of Law & Economics, 32(2), S179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richards, T. (2007). A nested logit model of strategic promotion. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(1), 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rust, J. (1994). Estimation of dynamic structural models, problems and prospects: Discrete decision processes. In C. Sims (Ed.), Advances in econometrics: Sixth World Congress (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, S., & Tucker, C. (2007). Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. Working paper, MIT.Google Scholar
  39. Seim, K. (2006). An empirical model of firm entry with endogenous product-type choices. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 619–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh, V., & Zhu, T. (2007). Pricing and market concentration in oligopoly markets. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  41. Sudhir, K., Datta, S., & Talukdar, D. (2007). A structural model of entry and location choice: The differentiation-agglomeration tradeoff. Working paper, Yale University.Google Scholar
  42. Sweeting, A. (2005). Coordination games, multiple equilibria and the timing of radio commercials. Working paper No. 68, CSIO, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  43. Thomadsen, R. (2005). The effect of ownership structure on prices in geographically differentiated industries. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 908–929.Google Scholar
  44. Thomadsen, R. (2007). Product positioning and competition: The role of location in the fast food industry. Marketing Science, 26, 792–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vitorino, M. A. (2007). Empirical entry games with complementarities: An application to the shopping center industry. Working paper, Chicago GSB.Google Scholar
  46. Zhu, T., & Singh, V. (2006). Spatial competition and endogenous location choices: An application to discount retailing. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michaela Draganska
    • 1
  • Sanjog Misra
    • 2
  • Victor Aguirregabiria
    • 3
  • Pat Bajari
    • 4
  • Liran Einav
    • 5
  • Paul Ellickson
    • 6
  • Dan Horsky
    • 2
  • Sridhar Narayanan
    • 1
  • Yesim Orhun
    • 7
  • Peter Reiss
    • 1
  • Katja Seim
    • 8
  • Vishal Singh
    • 9
  • Raphael Thomadsen
    • 10
  • Ting Zhu
    • 7
  1. 1.Graduate School of Business StanfordStanfordUSA
  2. 2.University of RochesterRochesterUSA
  3. 3.University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  5. 5.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  6. 6.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  7. 7.University of Chicago Graduate School of BusinessChicagoUSA
  8. 8.Wharton School of BusinessPhiladelphiaUSA
  9. 9.Stern School of BusinessNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  10. 10.Anderson School of BusinessUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations