Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the effects of personalized messages on consumers’ behavioral responses has yielded mixed findings. We explore how e-mail personalization influences click-through intentions. Our results suggest that consumers experience personalization reactance in response to highly personalized messages when the fit between the offer in the message and consumers’ personal characteristics is not explicitly justified by firms. Consequently, consumers are less willing to respond favorably to the offer. Results of two studies suggest that this effect primarily emerges for consumers who perceive the utility of the service to be relatively low. For those consumers with higher perceived utility, justification of personalization is less important because highly personalized messages are less likely to elicit reactance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, P. (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 87–101 (June).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, A., & Mela, C. (2003). E-customization. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(2), 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 11731182(December).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 225–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caudill, E. M., & Murphy, P. E. (2000). Consumer online privacy: Legal and ethical issues. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S., Li, H., & Lee, J.-H. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, XXXI(3), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, G. J., & Lehmann, D. R. (2004). Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Science, 23(1), 82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. Y. (2006). The attraction of internet personalization to web users. Electronic Markets, 16(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60, 50–68 (July).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S.-M., & Faedda, S. (1996). Refinement of the hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 173–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H.-F. (2006). Understanding behavioral intention to participate in virtual communities. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9(5), 540–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K. (2003). Pricing: Making profitable decisions 3rd Ed. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Thorbjornsen, H. (2005). Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 330–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2003). The impact of contact type on web survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postma, O. J., & Brokke, M. (2002). Personalization in practice: The proven effects of personalisation. Journal of Database Management, 9(2), 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I. (2005). Determinants of customers’ responses to customized offers: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69, 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.) Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: : Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorbjørnsen, H., Supphellen, M., Nysveen, H., & Pedersen, P. E. (2002). Building brand relationships online. A comparison of two interactive applications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. B. (2004). Consumer disclosure and disclosure avoidance: A motivational framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1&2), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahay, D., & Griffin, A. (2003). Information antecedents of personalisation and customisation in business-to-business service markets. Journal of Database Marketing, 10(3), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by a grant from the Teradata Center for Customer Relationship Management at Duke University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiffany Barnett White.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, T.B., Zahay, D.L., Thorbjørnsen, H. et al. Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Market Lett 19, 39–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-007-9027-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-007-9027-9

Keywords

Navigation