Adjoint design sensitivity analysis of molecular dynamics in parallel computing environment
- 283 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
An adjoint design sensitivity analysis method is developed for molecular dynamics using a parallel computing scheme of spatial decomposition in both response and design sensitivity analyses to enhance the computational efficiency. Molecular dynamics is a path-dependent transient dynamic problem with many design variables of high nonlinearity. Adjoint variable method is not appropriate for path-dependent problems but employed in this paper since the path is readily available from response analysis. The required adjoint system is derived as a terminal value problem. To compute the interaction forces between atoms in different spatial boxes, only atomic positions in the neighboring boxes are required to minimize the amount of data communications. Through some numerical examples, the high nonlinearity of the selected design variables is discussed. Also, the accuracy of the derived adjoint design sensitivity is verified by comparing with finite difference sensitivity and the efficiency of parallel adjoint variable method is demonstrated.
Keywords
Adjoint design sensitivity analysis Molecular dynamics Parallel computation Path-dependent problem Terminal value problem Lennard–Jones potentialReferences
- Black, J., Bopp, P.: The vibration of atoms at high miller index surfaces: face centred cubic metals. Surf. Sci. 140(2), 275–293 (1984). doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90733-7
- Cho, S., Choi, KK.: Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of non-linear transient dynamics. Part I: Sizing design. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 48(3):351–373 (2000). doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000530)48
- Cho, S., Choi, KK.: Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of non-linear transient dynamics. Part II: Configuration design. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 48(3):375–399 (2000). doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000530)48
- Choi, K., Kim, N.: Structural Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization, vol. 1. Springer, New York (2005)Google Scholar
- Farrell, D.E., Park, H.S., Liu, W.K.: Implementation aspects of the bridging scale method and application to intersonic crack propagation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 71(5), 583–605 (2007). doi: 10.1002/nme.1981 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Gao, Z., Ma, Y., Zhuang, H.: Optimal shape design for the time-dependent Navier–Stokes flow. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluid 57(10), 1505–1526 (2008). doi: 10.1002/fld.1673 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Hsieh, C., Arora, J.: Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamic response. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 43(2), 195–219 (1984). doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(84)90005-7
- Kadowaki, H., Liu, W.K.: Bridging multi-scale method for localization problems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 193(30–32), 3267–3302 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.11.014 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Kim, MG., Jang, H., Kim, H., Cho, S.: Multiscale adjoint design sensitivity analysis of atomistic-continuum dynamic systems using bridging scale decomposition. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21(3):035,005 (2013)Google Scholar
- Kim, M.G., Jang, H.L., Cho, S.: Adjoint design sensitivity analysis of reduced atomic systems using generalized Langevin equation for lattice structures. J. Comput. Phys. 240(0), 1–19 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.01.020 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lamb, J.S.W., Roberts, J.A.G.: Time-reversal symmetry in dynamical systems: a survey. Phys. D 112(1–2), 1–39 (1998). doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(97)00199-1
- Leach, A.R.: Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications. Pearson Education, Prentice Hall (2001)Google Scholar
- Liu, W.K., Karpov, E.G., Park, H.S.: Nano Mechanics and Materials. Wiley, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mendelev, M., Han, S., Srolovitz, D., Ackland, G., Sun, D., Asta, M.: Development of new interatomic potentials appropriate for crystalline and liquid iron. Philos. Mag. 83(35), 3977–3994 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Park, H.S., Karpov, E.G., Klein, P.A., Liu, W.K.: Three-dimensional bridging scale analysis of dynamic fracture. J. Comput. Phys. 207(2), 588–609 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.01.028 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Plimpton, S.: Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117(1), 1–19 (1995). doi: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Spohr, E., Heinzinger, K.: Molecular dynamics simulation of a water/metal interface. Chem. Phys. Lett. 123(3), 218–221 (1986). doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(86)80016-1
- Strogatz, S.H.: Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, 1st edn. Perseus Books Group, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
- Tadmor, E.B., Phillips, R., Ortiz, M.: Mixed atomistic and continuum models of deformation in solids. Langmuir 12(19), 4529–4534 (1996). doi: 10.1021/la9508912 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tortorelli, D.A., Haber, R.B., Lu, S.C.Y.: Design sensitivity analysis for nonlinear thermal systems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 77(1–2), 61–77 (1989). doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(89)90128-X MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tsay, J., Arora, J.: Nonlinear structural design sensivitity analysis for path dependent problems. Part 1: General theory. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 81(2), 183–208 (1990). doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(90)90109-Y MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tuckerman, M., Berne, B.J., Martyna, G.J.: Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 97(3), 1990–2001 (1992). doi: 10.1063/1.463137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar