Advertisement

Servitization strategy as a roadmap for the accounting machine

  • Antonio Leotta
  • Carmela Rizza
  • Daniela RuggeriEmail author
Article
First Online:
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

In the last decades contributions on servitization strategy have investigated the role of accounting in supporting it, highlighting the helpfulness of pragmatic constructivism in better understanding the accounting role. Following this advice, we reinterpret the metaphor of the accounting machine from the perspective of pragmatic constructivism and investigate how the accounting machine is used to prevent the so-called servitization paradox. Moving from the relevance of this paradox, the paper aims to examine how awareness of the servitization strategy could facilitate managers in the use of accounting information, communicating the business consequences of the strategy in decisions related to new product development (NPD) projects, typically characterized by cost and investment levels that are not fixed, leaving more room for preventing the servitization paradox. Accordingly, we conducted an interpretive case study in a division of a multinational manufacturing company operating in the semiconductor industry. The case evidence showed how managers become conscious of the functions and services that customers expect from a new device. More specifically, what emerges is how awareness of the servitization strategy helped managers in the use of accounting information throughout the NPD project’s maturity stages, characterized by different degrees of uncertainty. An actor perspective of uncertainty was followed in re-interpreting the different accounting machine that emerged from the evidence. All the evidence of the three NPD stages was interpreted as a process of co-authoring proactive and pragmatic truth.

Keywords

Servitization Strategy Accounting tools Accounting machine Pragmatic constructivism 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

References

  1. Abernethy, M. A., & Brownell, P. (1997). Management control technologies in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abernethy, M. A., & Stoelwinder, J. U. (1991). Budget use, task uncertainty, system goal orientation and subunit performance: A test of the ‘fit’ hypothesis in non-for-profit hospitals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(2), 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lasenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.Google Scholar
  4. Arbnor, I., & Bjerke, B. (1997). Methodology for creating business knowledge. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Baldvinsdottir, G., & Heidarson, C. (2017). Orchestrating strategic co-authorship. In H. Nørreklit (Ed.), A philosophy of management accounting: A pragmatic constructivist approach (pp. 149–168). NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergfors, M. E., & Larsson, A. (2009). Product and process innovation in process industry: A new perspective on development. Journal of Strategy and Management, 2(3), 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birnberg, J. G. (1988). Discussion of an empirical analysis of the expenditure budget in research and development. Contemporary Accounting Research, 4, 582–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(8), 709–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brownell, P. (1985). Budgetary systems and the control of functionally differentiated organizational activities. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 502–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., & Hughes, J. (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman, C. S. (1997). Reflections on a contingent view on accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davila, T. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ditillo, A. (2004). Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms: The role of management control systems as knowledge integration mechanisms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995). Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. Gebauer, H., Fleisch, E., & Friedli, T. (2005). Overcoming the service paradox in manufacturing companies. European Management Journal, 23, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, J. A. (2010). Financial reporting and management reporting systems. In J. A. Hall (Ed.), Accounting information systems (7th ed., pp. 349–393). OH: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  18. Hayes, D. D. (1977). The contingency theory of managerial accounting. The Accounting Review, 52(1), 22–39.Google Scholar
  19. Hopwood, A. G. (1980). The organizational and behavioral aspects of budgeting and control. In J. Arnold, B. Carsberg, & R. Scapens (Eds.), Topics in management accounting (pp. 221–240). Oxford: Philip Ailen.Google Scholar
  20. Howells, J. (2000). Innovation and services. Manchester: UMIST Internal Publication.Google Scholar
  21. Hu, Y., & McLoughlin, D. (2012). Creating new market for industrial services in nascent fields. Journal of Services Marketing, 26(5), 322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Iansiti, M. (1995). Shooting the rapids: Managing product development in turbulent environments. California Management Review, 38(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jørgensen, B., & Messner, M. (2010). Accounting and strategizing: A case study from new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 184–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korhonen, T., Stormi, K., Laine, T., & Liew, A. (2016). Examining technical and behavioural possibilities in developing fleet services in the machinery manufacturing context. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 6(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
  25. Laine, T., Cinquini, L., Suomala, P., & Tenucci, A. (2013). Roles of accounting and control in new service development within servitization: A literature review and research implications. In E. Gummeson, C. Mele, & F. Polese (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013 Naples forum on service - service dominant logic, network & systems theory and service science, 18–21 June, 2013, Naples, Italy (pp. 1–14). (Naples Forum on Service). Naples, Italy: Giannini Editore.Google Scholar
  26. Laine, T., Paranko, J., & Suomala, P. (2012a). Management accounting roles in supporting servitization: Implications for decision-making at multiple levels. Managing Service Quality, 22(3), 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laine, T., Paranko, J., & Suomala, P. (2012b). Using a business game concept to enhance servitization: Alongitudinal case study. Managing Service Quality, 22(5), 428–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lapsley, I. (2004). Making sense of interactions in an investigation of organizational practices and processes. In C. Humphrey & B. Lee (Eds.), The real life guide to accounting research (pp. 175–190). London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lay, G., Copani, G., Jäger, A., & Biege, S. (2010). The relevance of service in European manufacturing industries. Journal of Service Management, 21(5), 715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge. Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lewis, M., Portioli Staudacher, A., Slack, N. (2004). Beyond products and services: Opportunities and threats in servitization. Paper presented at IMS International Forum, Italy.Google Scholar
  32. Lindholm, A., Laine, T., & Suomala, P. (2017). The potential of management accounting and control in global operations: Profitability-driven service business development. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(2), 496–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mathieu, V. (2001). Service strategies within the manufacturing sector: Benefits, costs and partnership. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(5), 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organisational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Naranjo-Gil, D., & Hartmann, F. (2007). Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 735–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Neely, A. (2008). Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing. Operations Management Research, 1(2), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nixon, B. (1998). Research and development performance measurement: A case study. Management Accounting Research, 9, 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nørreklit, L. (2013). Reality as a construct: Outline of a pragmatic constructivist perspective. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 3(2), 57–66.Google Scholar
  39. Nørreklit, L. (2017a). Actor reality construction. In H. Nørreklit (Ed.), A philosophy of management accounting: A pragmatic constructivist approach (pp. 23–71). NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nørreklit, L. (2017b). Epistemology. In H. Nørreklit (Ed.), A philosophy of management accounting: A pragmatic constructivist approach (pp. 72–94). NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nørreklit, H., Mitchell, F., & Nielsen, L. B. (2017). Reflective planning and decision-making. In H. Nørreklit (Ed.), A philosophy of management accounting: A pragmatic constructivist approach (pp. 97–116). NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nørreklit, H., Nørreklit, L., & Mitchell, F. (2007). Theoretical conditions for validity in accounting performance measurement. In A. Neely (Ed.), Business performance measurement: Frameworks and methodologies (pp. 179–217). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Nørreklit, H., Nørreklit, L., & Mitchell, F. (2010). Towards a paradigmatic foundation for accounting practice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(6), 733–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14, 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rockness, H. O., & Shields, M. D. (1984). Organisational control systems in research and development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rockness, H. O., & Shields, M. D. (1988). An empirical analysis of the expenditure budget in research and development. Contemporary Accounting Research, 4, 568–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tenucci, A., & Cinquini, L. (2015). Will accounting information be relevant in the servitization process? In T. Baines & D. Harrison (Eds.), Servitization: The theory and impact. Proceedings of the spring servitization conference (pp. 99–106).Google Scholar
  49. Tenucci, A., & Laine, T. (2016). The role of management accounting in servitization. CIMA Executive Summary Report, 12(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
  50. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing innovation. Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1997). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organisational change and renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services. European Management Journal, 6(4), 314–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vernona, G. (1999). A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. White, A. L., Stoughton, M., & Feng, L. (1999). Servicizing: The quiet transition to extended product responsibility (p. 97). Boston, MA: Tellus Institute.Google Scholar
  55. Wise, R., & Baumgartner, P. (1999). Go downstream: The new profit imperative in manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 133–140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and BusinessUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options