Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 303–340 | Cite as

On the drivers of corporate social responsibility in banks: evidence from an ethical rating model

  • Giuliana Birindelli
  • Paola Ferretti
  • Mariantonietta IntontiEmail author
  • Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi


The purpose of our paper is the construction of a multidimensional ethical rating model, based on many items that represent the most significant Corporate Social Responsibility drivers of the banks. The items considered have been drawn from literature and from corporate reporting and websites of banks and then subjected to content analysis. The model, applied to a sample of European banks, was divided into four areas of analysis (Disclosure; Organization and Management; Offer of Socially Responsible Instruments; International Agreements, Certifications and Indexes) to identify the most frequent ethical conducts and the ones that require improvement measures. Our research highlights that banks pay more attention to the offer of socially responsible instruments and organization and management issues. On the contrary, the banks examined could enhance their socially responsible approach by reinforcing disclosure on Corporate Social Responsibility. In particular, there is a modest orientation towards disclosure on the basis of the triple bottom-line approach. Finally, as for international agreements, certifications and indexes, improvement actions are still needed: there are still many international principles which have not yet been adhered to and an increase in requests for more ethical/quality certifications and inclusion in reputational ratings would be desirable.


Corporate social responsibility Ethical rating European banks Sustainability Environmental, social and governance performance 

JEL Classification

G21 M14 


  1. Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagnoli, L. (2010). Responsabilità sociale e modelli di misurazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (1998). Enhancing Bank Transparency. September.Google Scholar
  4. Beattie, V., & Thomson, S. J. (2007). Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate intellectual capital disclosures. Accounting Forum, 31(2), 129–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beurden, P. V., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of value—a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birindelli, G. (2007). Il bilancio sociale nelle banche italiane quotate: grado di diffusione e modelli seguiti. In M. Carrassi & V. Peragine (Eds.), Responsabilità sociale d’impresa. Fondamenti teorici e strumenti di comunicazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  7. Birindelli, G., & Tarabella, A. (2001). La responsabilità sociale delle imprese e i nuovi strumenti di comunicazione nell’esperienza bancaria italiana. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  8. Brammer, S. J., Pavelin, S., & Porter, L. A. (2006). Corporate social performance and geographical diversification. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 1025–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Branco, C. M., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese Banks. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 232–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calabrese, A., & Lancioni, F. (2008). Analysis of corporate social responsibility in the service sector: Does exist a strategic path? Knowledge and Process Management, 15(2), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callado-Muñoz, F. J., & Utrero-Gonzalez, N. (2011). Does it pay to be socially responsible? Evidence from Spain’s retail banking sector. European Financial Management, 17(4), 755–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carbon Disclosure Project. (2011). CDP Global 500 Report.Google Scholar
  13. Chand, M. (2006). The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: Industry type as a boundary condition. The Business Review, 58(1), 240–245.Google Scholar
  14. Chih, H. L., Chih, H. H., & Chen, T. Y. (2010). On the determinants of corporate social responsibility: International evidence on the financial industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clarke, J., & Gibson-Sweet, M. (1999). The use of corporate social disclosures in the management of reputation and legitimacy: a cross sectorial analysis of UK top 100 companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coupland, C. (2006). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in web-based report. Currency in the banking sector? Critical Perspective on Accounting, 17(7), 865–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Ceuster, M. J. C., & Masschelein, N. (2003). Regulating banks through market discipline: A survey of the issues. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17(5), 749–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de la Cuesta-González, M., Muñoz-Torres, M. M., & Fernández-Izquierdo, M. A. (2006). Analysis of social performance in the Spanish financial industry through public data. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(3), 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Douglas, A., Doris, J., & Johnson, B. (2004). Corporate social reporting in Irish financial institutions. The TQM Magazine, 16(6), 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21 st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels, 25.10.2011, COM(2011) 681 final.Google Scholar
  23. European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals. (2007–2013). Financial inclusion and migrant banking.Google Scholar
  24. Eurosif. (2010). European Sustainable investment forum.Google Scholar
  25. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2000–2011). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Version 3.1, available at
  26. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamid, F. Z. A. (2004). Corporate social disclosure by banks and finance companies: Malaysian evidence. Corporate Ownership and Control, 1(4), 118–130.Google Scholar
  28. Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2007). Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: Two separate concepts or two sides of the same coin? Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hossain, M., & Reaz, M. (2007). The determinants and characteristics of voluntary disclosure by Indian banking companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(5), 274–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Intonti, M. (2007). Gli strumenti di comunicazione della responsabilità sociale nelle banche di prossimità: un’analisi del contesto pugliese. In M. Carrassi & V. Peragine (Eds.), Responsabilità sociale d’impresa. Fondamenti teorici e strumenti di comunicazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  31. ISO. (2010). UNI ISO 26000: 2010. Guidance on social responsibility. November.Google Scholar
  32. Italian Banking Association. (2010). ABI Monthly Outlook, November.Google Scholar
  33. Karaibrahimoglu, Y. Z. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in times of financial crisis. African Journal of Business Management, 4(4), 382–389.Google Scholar
  34. Locatelli, R., & Schena, C. (2009). Riflessioni su reputazione e responsabilità sociale nelle banche. In M. Comana & M. Brogi (a cura di). Banca, Sistemi e Modelli, saggi in onore di Tancredi Bianchi. Roma: Bancaria Editrice.Google Scholar
  35. Mahoney, L. S., & Thorne, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and long-term compensation: Evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(3), 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matute-Vallejo, J., Bravo, R., & Pina, J. M. (2010). The influence of corporate social responsibility and price fairness on customer behaviour: Evidence from the financial sector. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(6), 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: An investigation in the U.K. supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4), 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD. (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, May 25.Google Scholar
  40. Ogrizek, M. (2002). The effect of corporate social responsibility on the branding of financial services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 6(3), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prior, F., & Argandoňa, A. (2009). Best practice in credit accessibility and corporate social responsibility in financial institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scholtens, B. (2006). Finance as a driver of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scholtens, B. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the international banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scholtens, B., & Dam, L. (2007). Banking on equator. Are banks that adopted the equator principles different from non-adopters? World Development, 35(8), 1307–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Soana, M. G. (2011). The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance on the banking sector. Journal Business and Ethics, 104(1), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sotorrío, L. L., & Sánchez, J. L. F. (2008). Corporate social responsibility of the most highly reputed European and North American firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2007). Cooperative, community-spirited and commercial: Social sustainability at Bendigo bank. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(5), 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tarantola, A. M. (2011). La trasparenza sostanziale nei rapporti tra banche e clienti: la visione della Banca d’Italia, 6 giugno.Google Scholar
  50. Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Viganò, F., & Nicolai, D. (2009). CSR in the European banking sector: Evidence from a sector survey. In R. Barth & F. Wolff (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Europe. Chelthenam, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  52. Vigeo rating. (2011). Green, Social and Ethical Funds in Europe, October.Google Scholar
  53. Vitaliano, D. F., & Stella, G. P. (2006). The cost of corporate social responsibility: The case of the community reinvestment act. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26(3), 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weber, O. (2005). Sustainability benchmarking of European banks and financial service organizations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(2), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuliana Birindelli
    • 1
  • Paola Ferretti
    • 2
  • Mariantonietta Intonti
    • 3
    Email author
  • Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi
    • 4
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Economia AziendaleUniversity “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-PescaraPescaraItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Economia e ManagementUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Studi aziendali e giusprivatisticiUniversity of Bari “Aldo Moro”BariItaly
  4. 4.Dipartimento di Scienze giuridiche, storiche, economiche e socialiUniversity “Magna Graecia” of CatanzaroCatanzaroItaly

Personalised recommendations