Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 887–906 | Cite as

Incentivising inter-municipal collaboration: the Lombard experience

Article

Abstract

The purpose of this exploratory research is to show how incentive policies have helped to shape the scenario of inter-municipal partnerships in the Italian region of Lombardy. Do these policies really work? Have they been the driver of greater collaboration among municipalities? Overall, the impact of the financial subsidies can be seen mainly when the intended beneficiaries are involved in the stages of negotiation and commitment that precede the setting-up of the collaborative arrangements. However, the capacity of the incentives to ensure that collaborative efforts are effectively maintained and developed over time is questionable. Importantly, the incentives do not seem to make a real difference in the collaborative choices aimed at joint policy-making and regulation. This qualitative study extends the evaluation research on implementation and contributes to the partnership management debate.

Keywords

Local government Incentive policies Implementation Inter-municipal collaboration Partnerships 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Alessandro Bianchi for his support in gathering and processing the data shown in Fig. 1. The authors also thank the guest Editors and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. While the article is the joint product of the authors, in the final drafting, Sect. 4 was written by Massimo Simonetta, the other sections by Maddalena Sorrentino, and Sect. 7 was jointly written. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 10th EURAM Conference held on 19–22 May 2010 in Rome.

References

  1. Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borgonovi, E. (2000a). Governare l’amministrazione pubblica con il sistema a rete. Azienda Pubblica, 13(5), 485–487.Google Scholar
  4. Borgonovi, E. (2000b). L’organizzazione a rete nelle amministrazioni pubbliche. Azienda Pubblica, 13(4), 341–343.Google Scholar
  5. Bovens, M., ‘t Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2006). The politics of policy evaluation. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 321–335). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ceriani, A., & Lorenzini, E. (2010). Funzioni delle Unioni di Comuni in Lombardia e implicazioni per le politiche regionali e nazionali. In I. S. AE (Ed.), La finanza locale in Italia. Rapporto 2009 (pp. 108–119). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  7. Considine, M. (2005). Partnerships, relationships and networks: Understanding local collaboration strategies in different countries. In OECD (Ed.), Local governance and the drivers of growth (pp. 89–109). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  8. Diez, M.-A. (2002). Evaluating new regional policies: Reviewing the theory and practice. Evaluation, 8(3), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferlie, E., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). Managing through networks: some issues and implications for the NHS. British Journal of Management, 7(Special Issue), S81–S99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiorillo, F., & Robotti, L. (Eds.). (2006). L’Unione di Comuni. Teoria economica ed esperienze concrete. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  11. Formez-Anci. (2005). Cooperazione inter-istituzionale Regione Autonomie Locali. Roma.Google Scholar
  12. Fuller, B. W., & Vu, K. M. (2011). Exploring the dynamics of policy interaction: Feedback among and impacts from multiple, concurrently applied policy approaches for promoting collaboration. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(2), 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geddes, M. (2006). National evaluation of local strategic partnerships. Theory of change issue paper. London: Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG).Google Scholar
  14. Hambleton, R. (1983). Planning systems and policy implementation. Journal of Public Policy, 3(4), 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haveri, A. (2008). Evaluation of change in local governance: The rhetorical wall and the politics of images. Evaluation, 14(2), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hjern, B., & Porter, D. O. (1981). Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Organization Studies, 2(3), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hudson, B. (2004). Analysing network partnerships. Public Management Review, 6(1), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hulst, R., & van Montfort, A. (Eds.). (2007). Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Hulst, R., van Montfort, A., Haveri, A., et al. (2009). Institutional shifts in inter-municipal service delivery. Public Organization Review, 9(3), 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using collaboration as a governance strategy. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IReR (2007). Piccoli comuni di fronte alla sfida dello sviluppo. Milano: Consiglio Regionale della Lombardia.Google Scholar
  22. IReR (2009a). Lo stato delle forme associative tra enti locali in Lombardia. Milano: Consiglio Regionale della Lombardia.Google Scholar
  23. IReR (2009b). Stato attuale dei piccoli comuni ed esigenze di sostegno istituzionale. Milano: Consiglio Regionale della Lombardia.Google Scholar
  24. Isett, K. R., Mergel, I. A., LeRoux, K., et al. (2011). Networks in public administration scholarship: Understanding where we are and where we need to go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(S1), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keast, R., Mandell, M. P., Brown, K., et al. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kenis, P., & Provan, K. G. (2009). Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration, 87(3), 440–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klijn, E.-H., Koppenjan, J., & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: A theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73(Autumn), 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of the interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousands Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Lowndes, V., & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76(2), 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martinez, M. (2004). Organizzazione, informazioni e tecnologie. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
  32. Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.Google Scholar
  33. May, P. J., & Burby, R. J. (1996). Coercive versus cooperative policies: Comparing intergovernmental mandate performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(2), 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2007). Collaborative service arrangements. Public Management Review, 9(4), 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGuire, M., Agranoff, R., & Silvia, C. (2010). Collaborative public administration. The Foundations of Public Administration Series, 61(6), 671–681.Google Scholar
  36. Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2001). Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. Public Education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meneguzzo, M., & Cepiku, D. (Eds.) (2008). Network pubblici. Strategia, struttura e governance. Milano: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Mercurio, R., & Testa, F. (2000). Organizzazione. Assetto e relazioni nel sistema di business. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  39. Morciano, M. (2008). Le riforme perdute della P.A.: strategie e meccanismi di attuazione. Retrieved from http://amministrazioneincammino.luiss.it/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/15996_morciano_riforma.pdf.
  40. Myers, M. D. (2009). Qualitative research in business & management. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  41. O’Leary, R., & Bingham, L. B. (Eds.). (2009). The collaborative public manager. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  42. O’Toole, L. J. (1983). Interorganizational co-operation and the implementation of labour market training policies: Sweden and the federal republic of germany. Organization Studies, 4(2), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Toole, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: Implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(4), 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation, 8(2), 157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 23–43.Google Scholar
  46. Piore, M. J. (2011). Beyond markets: Sociology, street-level bureaucracy, and the management of the public sector. Regulation & Governance, 5(1), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (Eds.). (1984). Implementation (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Regonini, G. (2001). Capire le politiche pubbliche. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  51. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, K. G., Carroll, S. J., & Ashford, S. J. (1995). Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spekman, R. E., Forbes, T. M., Isabella, L. A., et al. (1998). Alliance management: A view from the past and a look to the future. Journal of Management Studies, 35(6), 747–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stoker, R. P. (1989). A regime framework for implementation analysis: Cooperation and reconciliation of federalist imperatives. Policy Studies Review, 9(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Testa, P. (Ed.). (2010). Lo stato delle Unioni. Roma: Cittalia.Google Scholar
  56. Turrini, A., Cristofoli, D., Frosini, F., et al. (2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Administration, 88(2), 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Enacting leadership for collaborative advantage: Dilemmas of ideology and pragmatism in the activities of partnership managers. British Journal of Management, 14, S61–S76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research (Second edition ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze economiche, aziendali e statisticheUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Ancitel LombardiaCologno MonzeseItaly

Personalised recommendations