Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 37–59 | Cite as

Female board appointments and firm valuation: short and long-term effects



The presence of women on boards of directors has become a high profile issue in recent years. Several studies, based largely on data from countries with Anglo-Saxon corporate governance systems, have investigated the influence of female board appointments on firm performance. This study focuses on the impact of female directors in Spain, where debate about this topic has been intense for two reasons: the recommendation in 2006 by Spain’s Unified Good Governance Code of positive discrimination in favour of female board appointments and the passing in 2007 of a Gender Equality Act by the Spanish parliament. Our paper analyses the short and long term effect of the appointment of female directors prior to these events. We use an event study to analyze the short term stock market reaction to the appointment of female directors and a multiple regression approach, using the system GMM estimation procedure, to assess the long term influence on firm value of female boardroom appointments. We find that the stock market reacts positively in the short term to the announcement of female board appointments, suggesting that investors on average believe that female directors add value. This belief appears to be confirmed by our regression results which show that female board appointments are positively associated with firm value over a sustained period. These results suggest that the legislative changes in Spain make economic sense as well as advancing the cause of women in Spanish boardrooms.


Women Board of directors Market reaction 

JEL Classification

G30 G34 G38 


  1. Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2005). Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18, 1403–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldama Report (2003). Report of the special commission for the promotion of the transparency and the security in the financial markets and in listed companies. Madrid.Google Scholar
  4. Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? gender differences in altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2006). Does corporate governance predict firms’ market values? evidence from Korea. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22, 366–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Block, S. (1999). The role of non-affiliated outside directors in monitoring the firm and the effect on shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 12, 1–8.Google Scholar
  8. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment conditions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Böhren, O., & Ström, R. O. (2005). Aligned, informed, and decisive: Characteristics of value-creating boards. Oslo, September: Working Paper Norwegian School of Management BI.Google Scholar
  10. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2007). Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brick, I. E. & Chidambaran, N. K. (2007). Board meetings, committee structure, and firm performance. Available at SSRN:
  12. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown-Kruse, J., & Hummels, D. (1993). Gender differences in laboratory public goods contribution: Do individuals put their money where their mouth is? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 22, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, J., Lo, A., & MacKinlay, C. (1997). The Econometrics of financial markets. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Carrera, N., Gutiérrez, I., & Salvador, C. (2001). Gender, the state and the audit profession: Evidence from Spain (1942–88). European Accounting Review, 10, 803–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Catalyst. (2004). The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and gender diversity. New York, NY: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  18. Catalyst. (2006). 2005 Census of women board directors of the fortune 500. New York, NY: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  19. Catalyst. (2007). 2006 Census of women board directors of the fortune 500. New York, NY: Catalyst.Google Scholar
  20. Catan, T. (2006). In the dark heart of machismo shines a beacon of sexual equality. The Times, November 29.Google Scholar
  21. Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores. (2006). Report of the special working group on the good governance of listed companies. Madrid: CNMV. 19 May.Google Scholar
  22. Corrado, C. J. (1989). A nonparametric test for abnormal security-price performance in event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 23, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cox, T. H., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implication for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 45–56.Google Scholar
  24. Curdová, A. (2005). Discrimination against women in the workforce and the workplace. Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men, Spanish Parliamentary Assembly, Doc. 10484.Google Scholar
  25. Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2001). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7, 209–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Du Rietz, A., & Henrekson, M. (2000). Testing the female underperformance hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 14(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dyckman, T. R., Philbrick, D., & Stephan, J. (1984). A comparison of event study methodologies using daily stock returns: A simulation approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director’s diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Friederich, S., Gregory, A., Matatko, J., & Tonks, I. (2002). Short-run returns around the trades of corporate insiders on the London stock exchange. European Financial Management, 8(1), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. (1982). Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. In J. McCall (Ed.), The economics of information and uncertainty (pp. 107–140). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heidrick, & Struggles, (2007). Corporate governance in Europe 2007 report. Paris: Raising the Bar.Google Scholar
  37. Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effect of board composition and direct incentives on corporate performance. Financial Management, 20, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Himmelberg, C. P., Hubbard, R. G., & Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 353–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holmes, S. (2008). Smashing the glass ceiling. BBC News online, 11 January.
  40. ILO. (2007). Global employment trends for women brief. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  41. Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2003). A field study of group diversity, group context, and performance, working paper. Philadelphia: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  42. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323–339.Google Scholar
  43. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36, 620–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Kini, O., Kracaw, W., & Mian, S. (1995). Corporate takeovers, firm performance, and board composition. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1, 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klein, A. (2002). Economic determinants of audit committee independence. The Accounting Review, 77, 435–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Konrad, A. M., & Kramer, V. W. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 22.Google Scholar
  49. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leech, D., & Manjón, M. C. (2002). Corporate governance in Spain (with an application of the power indices approach). European Journal of Law and Economics, 13(2), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Martín-Ugedo, J. F. (2003). Equity rights in Spain: Flotation costs and wealth effects. Journal of Business Financial and Accounting, 30, 1277–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mateos de Cabo, R., Gimeno, R. & Lorenzo, E. (2007). Discrimination on the Spanish Boards of Directors: Analysis and economic implications. Available at SSRN:
  53. McSmith, A. (2008). Closing the gender gap: Why women now reign in Spain. The Independent, 16 April.Google Scholar
  54. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Myers, S. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nowell, C., & Tinkler, S. (1994). The Influence of gender on the provision of a public good. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 25, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Olivencia Report (1998). Report of the special commission to consider a code of ethics for companies boards of directors, Madrid.Google Scholar
  58. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006a). OECD labour force statistics by age and sex. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  59. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006b). Education at a Glance 2006. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  60. Peterson, P. P. (1989). Event studies: A review of issues and methodology. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 28(3), 36–66.Google Scholar
  61. Randøy, T., Thomsen, S., & Oxelheim, L. (2006). A nordic perspective on corporate board diversity. Oslo: Working Paper Nordic Innovation Centre.Google Scholar
  62. Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Richard, O. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 164–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Richard, O. C., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., & Chadwick, K. (2004). Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 21–30.Google Scholar
  66. Rose, G. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Implicit theories of leadership and gender and the precariousness of women’s leadership positions. In B. Schyns & J. R. Meindl (Eds.), Implicit leadership theories: Essays and explorations. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  69. Seiler, M. J. (2000). The efficacy of event study methodologies: Measuring EREIT abnormal performance under conditions of induced variance. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 13, 101–112.Google Scholar
  70. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, J. P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial value: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 355–372.Google Scholar
  71. Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 569–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1985). The social identity of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology and intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  74. Tyson, L. (2003). The Tyson report on the recruitment and development of non-executive Directors, London Business School.Google Scholar
  75. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weisbach, M. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Williams, C. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, K., & O’Reilly, C. (1998). Forty years of diversity research: A review. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 77–140). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  80. Wools, D. (2007). Spain lawmakers OK women’s equality law, Associated Press, March 15.Google Scholar
  81. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Accounting & Finance, Stirling Management SchoolUniversity of StirlingStirlingScotland, UK
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of MurciaMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations