Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Beneath the Surface: A Comparison of Methods for Assessment of Quality of Care for Maternal and Neonatal Health Care in Rural Uganda

Abstract

Objectives

Efforts to improve access to healthcare in low-income countries will not achieve the maternal and child health (MCH) Sustainable Development Goals unless a concomitant improvement in the quality of care (QoC) occurs. This study measures infrastructure and QoC indicators in rural Ugandan health facilities. Valid measure of the quality of current clinical practices in resource-limited settings are critical for effectively intervening to reduce adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods

Facility-based assessments of infrastructure and clinical quality during labor and delivery were conducted in six primary care health facilities in the greater Masaka area, Uganda in 2017. Data were collected using direct observation of clinical encounters and facility checklists. Direct observation comprised the entire delivery process, from initial client assessment to discharge, and included emergency management (e.g. postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal resuscitation). Health providers were assessed on their adherence to best practice standards of care.

Results

The quality of facility infrastructure was relatively high in facilities, with little variation in availability of equipment and supplies. However, heterogeneity in adherence to best clinical practices was noted across procedure type and facility. Adherence to crude measures of clinical quality were relatively high but more sensitive measures of the same clinical practice were found to be much lower.

Conclusions for Practice

Standard indicators of clinical practice may be insufficient to validly measure clinical quality for maternal and newborn care if we want to document evidence of impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Academy Of Pediatrics Committee On, F., Newborn, American College Of, O., & Gynecologists Committee On Obstetric, P. (2015). The Apgar Score. Pediatrics,136(4), 819–822. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2651.

  2. Carlo, W. A., Goudar, S. S., Jehan, I., Chomba, E., Tshefu, A., Garces, A., First Breath Study, G. (2010). Newborn-care training and perinatal mortality in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine,362(7), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0806033.

  3. Egger, J. R., Stankevitz, K., Korom, R., Angwenyi, P., Sullivan, B., Wang, J., et al. (2017). Evaluating the effects of organizational and educational interventions on adherence to clinical practice guidelines in a low-resource primary-care setting in Kenya. Health Policy and Planning,32(6), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx004.

  4. Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M., O'Neal, L., Consortium, R. E. (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics,95, 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.

  5. Jamison, D. T., Summers, L. H., Alleyne, G., Arrow, K. J., Berkley, S., Binagwaho, A., et al. (2013). Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation. Lancet,382(9908), 1898–1955. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62105-4.

  6. Kruk, M. E., Chukwuma, A., Mbaruku, G., & Leslie, H. H. (2017a). Variation in quality of primary-care services in Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Rwanda, Senegal, Uganda and the United Republic of Tanzania. Bulletin of the World Health Organization,95(6), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.175869.

  7. Kruk, M. E., Pate, M., & Mullan, Z. (2017b). Introducing The Lancet Global Health Commission on High-Quality Health Systems in the SDG era. Lancet Glob Health,5(5), e480–e481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30101-8.

  8. Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., et al. (2018). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Global Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3.

  9. Larson, E., Vail, D., Mbaruku, G. M., Mbatia, R., & Kruk, M. E. (2017). Beyond utilization: measuring effective coverage of obstetric care along the quality cascade. International Journal for Quality in Health Care,29(1), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw141.

  10. Leslie, H. H., Sun, Z., & Kruk, M. E. (2017). Association between infrastructure and observed quality of care in 4 healthcare services: A cross-sectional study of 4,300 facilities in 8 countries. PLoS Medicine,14(12), e1002464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002464.

  11. Macarayan, E. K., Gage, A. D., Doubova, S. V., Guanais, F., Lemango, E. T., Ndiaye, Y., et al. (2018). Assessment of quality of primary care with facility surveys: a descriptive analysis in ten low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Global Health,6(11), e1176–e1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30440-6.

  12. Maternal Health Task Force. (2018). The Sustainable Development Goals and Maternal Mortality, accessed at: https://www.mhtf.org/topics/the-sustainable-development-goals-and-maternal-mortality/.

  13. Olivier, J., Tsimpo, C., Gemignani, R., Shojo, M., Coulombe, H., Dimmock, F., et al. (2015). Understanding the roles of faith-based health-care providers in Africa: review of the evidence with a focus on magnitude, reach, cost, and satisfaction. Lancet,386(10005), 1765–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60251-3.

  14. Rahman, A., Begum, T., Ashraf, F., Akhter, S., Hoque, D. M. E., Ghosh, T. K., . . . Anwar, I. (2019). Feasibility and effectiveness of electronic vs. paper partograph on improving birth outcomes: A prospective crossover study design. PLoS One, 14(10), e0222314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222314

  15. Rowe, A. K., Rowe, S. Y., Peters, D. H., Holloway, K. A., Chalker, J., & Ross-Degnan, D. (2018). Effectiveness of strategies to improve health-care provider practices in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health,6(11), e1163–e1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30398-X.

  16. Semrau, K. E. A., Hirschhorn, L. R., Marx Delaney, M., Singh, V. P., Saurastri, R., Sharma, N., et al. (2017). Outcomes of a Coaching-Based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program in India. New England Journal of Medicine,377(24), 2313–2324. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1701075.

  17. Serbanescu, F., Goldberg, H. I., Danel, I., Wuhib, T., Marum, L., Obiero, W., et al. (2017). Rapid reduction of maternal mortality in Uganda and Zambia through the saving mothers, giving life initiative: results of year 1 evaluation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,17(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1222-y.

  18. The Demographic and Health Surveys Program of the United States Agency for International Development. (2018). Service provision assessments (SPA), https://dhsprogram.com/What-We-Do/Survey-Types/SPA.cfm.

  19. The World Bank. (2016). Mortality rate, under-5 (per 1,000 live births).

  20. Uganda Bureau of Statistics, & ICF. (2018). Uganda demographic and health survey 2016. Retrieved from https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR333/FR333.pdf.

  21. UNICEF Data. (2016). Antenatal Care.

  22. United Nations. (2018). Sustainable development goals. Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/.

  23. United States Agency for International Development. (2018). Saving mothers, giving life: Final report. Retrieved from https://www.savingmothersgivinglife.org/resources.aspx.

  24. United States Agency for International Development Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program. (2013). Introduction to the maternal and newborn quality of care surveys. Retrieved from https://www.mchip.net/sites/default/files/mchipfiles/Introduction%20to%20QoC%20surveys.pdf.

  25. World Health Organization. (1994). World Health Organization partograph in management of labour World Health Organization Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. Lancet,343(8910), 1399–1404.

  26. World Health Organization. (2016). Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/improving-maternal-newborn-care-quality/en/.

  27. World Health Organization, OECD, & International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. (2018). Delivering quality health services: A global imperative for universal health coverage (ISBN 978–92–4–151390–6 WHO). Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272465/9789241513906-eng.pdf?ua=1:

  28. World Health Organization: e-Library of Evidence for Nutrition Actions (eLENA). (2019). Optimal timing of cord clamping for the prevention of iron deficiency anaemia in infants. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/elena/titles/full_recommendations/cord_clamping/en/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff at LifeNet International for their generosity and cooperation in carrying out this study.

Funding

The study was funded by LifeNet International.

Author information

The authors report a grant from LifeNet International during the conduct of the study. Three of the authors of this publication (JK, LA, SW) were paid employees of LifeNet International, the funder, at the time this study was carried out and assisted with study design, data collection and manuscript preparation. However, no LifeNet author had access to aggregate study data during data collection, nor was any LifeNet employee involved with data analysis or in the initial presentation of study results.

Correspondence to Joseph R. Egger.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egger, J.R., Headley, J., Li, Y. et al. Beneath the Surface: A Comparison of Methods for Assessment of Quality of Care for Maternal and Neonatal Health Care in Rural Uganda. Matern Child Health J 24, 328–339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02862-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Clinical
  • Quality of care
  • Maternal and child health
  • Direct clinical observation
  • Low-income countries