Primary Care Women’s Health Screening: A Case Study of a Community Engaged Human Centered Design Approach to Enhancing the Screening Process
- 192 Downloads
To apply a Human Centered Design (HCD) approach to co-designing a comprehensive women’s health screening tool with community partners.
Evidenced-based health screenings for behaviors and risks are important tools in primary health care and disease prevention, especially for women. However, numerous barriers limit the effective implementation of comprehensive health screenings, and often lead to excluding important risks such as intimate partner violence (IPV). Utilizing a human centered design approach (HCD), Mountain Area Health Education Center (MAHEC, NC USA) developed a community co-designed 9-topic health screening for women. Key end-users were recruited to participate in the design process, including women who identified IPV as a health issue in their community, Spanish speaking women, domestic violence program organizers, and MAHEC staff.
A total of 21 participants collaborated during three design sessions on two specific goals: 1) creating a comprehensive women’s health screening tool from the existing tools that were in use in our clinics at the time, and 2) incorporating IPV screening. Through the HCD sessions, participants highlighted the impact of what they termed “Triple T: time, trust and talk” on the effectiveness of women’s health screening.
Our co-designed women’s health screening tool is a first step towards addressing screening barriers from both primary care provider’s and community women’s perspectives. Future research will explore the facilitators of and barriers to implementing the tools in different primary care settings. Future work should also more systematically examine whether and how screening processes may reinforce or contribute to women’s feelings of being stereotyped, and how screening processes can be designed to avoid stereotype threat, which has the potential to reduce the effectiveness of screenings intended to promote women’s health.
KeywordsHealth screenings Women Intimate partner violence Human center design
We would like to acknowledge the North Carolina Coalition against Domestic Violence, who provided funding for this project.
- American Academy of Family Physicians. (2018). Women’s health clinical recommendations & guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/browse/topics.tag-womens-health.html.
- Asche, D., Terwiesch, C., & Volpp, K. (2017). How to reduce primary care doctors’ workloads while improving care. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/11/how-to-reduce-primary-care-doctors-workloads-while-improving-care.
- Institute, L. U. M. A. (2012). Innovative for people handbook of human-centered design methods. Pittsburg, PA: LUMA Institute.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, J. (2007). Round robin. Retrieved from https://www.betterevaluation.org/en/evaluation-options/roundrobin.
- Kumar, V. (2013). 101 design methods: A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Martin, B., & Hanington, B. (2012). Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.Google Scholar
- Merai, R. (2015). CDC coffee break: Human-centered design meets evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/pubs/docs/cb_july2015.pdf.
- Sohal, H., Eldridge, S., & Feder, G. (2007). The sensitivity and specificity of four questions (HARK) to identify intimae partner violence: A diagnostic accuracy study in general practice. BMC Family Practice, 8(49), 1–9.Google Scholar
- The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2017). Women’s preventive services initiative. Retrieved from https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Annual-Womens-Health-Care/Womens-Preventive-Services-Initiative.
- United States Preventive Services Task Force. (2018). USPSTF A and B recommendations. Retrieved from https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/uspstf-a-and-b-recommendations.
- Woods-Giscombe, C., Robinson, N. M., Carthron, D., Devane-Johnson, S., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2016). Superwoman schema, stigma, spirituality, and culturally sensitive providers: Factors influencing African American women’s use of mental health services. Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity, Education, Research, and Policy., 9(1), 1124–1144.Google Scholar