Advertisement

Enhanced Information Package Given at Birth: Effects on Early Parenting Experiences and Use of Educational Resources and Community Services at Age 3 Months

  • Karen M. BenziesEmail author
  • Sarah M. Horn
  • Leslie A. Barker
  • Cyne Johnston
  • Dena Berci
  • Jana Kurilova
Article

Abstract

Objectives To determine the effect of an enhanced information package, the Welcome to Parenthood® (W2P) Kit, given at birth on (a) early parenting experiences and (b) use of educational resources and community services. Methods Two-group, post-test only design, with parents (mothers and fathers) in comparison group (n = 186; received standard discharge information) recruited prior to intervention group (n = 195; received W2P Kit); most were Canadian-born and highly educated. Participants completed an investigator-designed, online or telephone survey at 3 months postpartum, which generated quantitative and qualitative data. The W2P Kit included evidence-based, educational resources about infant feeding, child development, and parenting skills that targeted mothers and fathers, information about community services for new parents, infant board book, and small gifts. Results At 3 months postpartum the intervention group was significantly more likely to be aware of, and to have used, the educational resources than the comparison group. The intervention group was also more likely to have made an unplanned visit to the doctor for their infant, but groups did not differ in early parenting experiences or use of community services. Parents who received the W2P Kit reported that it was helpful to learn about various aspects of child development and parenting. Conclusions for Practice Parents who received the W2P Kit reported increased awareness and use of educational resources, but participants in both groups reported similar experiences as a new parent and use of community services. An enhanced information package given at birth may be a useful health promotion strategy.

Keywords

Mothers Fathers Postpartum Parenting education Intervention study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge funding from UpStart: Champions for Children and Youth, The United Way of Calgary and Area, and the Alberta Family Wellness Initiative, Innovation Fund for the Welcome to Parenthood—Rockyview General Hospital project. Thanks to research assistants Deb Wasylenko, Ashleigh Tan, Phil Woods, Alina Stanciu, Dennis Kim, Jacinthe Ly Dang, Indiana Best, and AHS Volunteers.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10995_2018_2670_MOESM1_ESM.docx (43 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 42 KB)

References

*Denotes reference to items in Table 1

  1. *Alberta Family Wellness Initiative. (n.d.). Building better brains—Learning card set. Calgary, AB: Author.Google Scholar
  2. *Alberta Father Involvement Initiative. (n.d.). The new baby manual for dads: 24-hr cribside assistance. Edmonton, AB: Author.Google Scholar
  3. *Alberta Health Services. (2013). Healthy parents, healthy children. Edmonton: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Benzies, K., Barker, L., Clark, D., Dennis, D., Ghali, L., & Tough, S. C. (2013a). UpStart parent survey user’s manual. Calgary: University of Calgary.Google Scholar
  5. Benzies, K., Clarke, D., Barker, L., & Mychasiuk, R. (2013b). UpStart parent survey: A new psychometrically valid tool for the evaluation of prevention-focused parenting programs. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(8), 1452–1458.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1152-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, M. M., Walker, S. P., Fernald, L. C., Andersen, C. T., DiGirolamo, A. M., Lu, C., et al. (2017). Early childhood development coming of age: Science through the life course. The Lancet, 389(10064), 77–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31389-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371–399.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Britto, P. R., Lye, S. J., Proulx, K., Yousafzai, A. K., Matthews, S. G., Vaivada, T., et al. (2017). Nurturing care: Promoting early childhood development. The Lancet, 389(10064), 91–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryanton, J., Beck, C. T., & Montelpare, W. (2013). Postnatal parental education for optimizing infant general health and parent-infant relationships. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013(11), 1–59.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004068.pub4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. (2016). From best practices to breakthrough impacts: A science-based approach to building a more promising future for young children and families. Cambridge: Author.Google Scholar
  11. Deave, T., Johnson, D., & Ingram, J. (2008). Transition to parenthood: The needs of parents in pregnancy and early parenthood. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 8(1), 30.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Devolin, M., Phelps, D., Duhaney, T., Benzies, K., Hildebrandt, C., Rikhy, S., & Churchill, J. (2013). Information and support needs among parents of young children in a region of Canada: A cross-sectional survey. Public Health Nursing, 30(3), 193–201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellberg, L., Högberg, U., & Lindh, V. (2010). ‘We feel like one, they see us as two’: New parents’ discontent with postnatal care. Midwifery, 26(4), 463–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.10.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. First 5 California. (2015). Early investments for lifelong results: 2014-15 First 5 California annual report. Sacramento, CA: First 5 California, California Children & Families Commission.Google Scholar
  15. *Fox, M. (2010). Ten little fingers and ten little toes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  16. Franke, T., Hanzlicek, L., Morris, J., & Espinosa, L. (2011). First 5 California kit for new parents: Program evaluation report. Los Angeles: The University of California Los Angeles Center for Healthier Children, Families, and Communities.Google Scholar
  17. Gilmer, C., Buchan, J. L., Letourneau, N., Bennett, C. T., Shanker, S. G., Fenwick, A., & Smith-Chant, B. (2016). Parent education interventions designed to support the transition to parenthood: A realist review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 59, 118–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gutman, L. M., & Feinstein, L. (2010). Parenting behaviours and children’s development from infancy to early childhood: Changes, continuities and contributions. Early Child Development and Care, 180(4), 535–556.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430802113042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holden, G. W. (2015). Parenting: A dynamic perspective (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Johansson, K., & Darj, E. (2004). What type of information do parents need after being discharged directly from the delivery ward? Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 109(3), 229–238.  https://doi.org/10.3109/2000-1967-085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McKellar, L. V., Pincombe, J. I., & Henderson, A. M. (2006). Insights from Australian parents into educational experiences in the early postnatal period. Midwifery, 22(4), 356–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2005.09.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitnick, D. M., Heyman, R. E., & Smith Slep, A. M. (2009). Changes in relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(6), 848–852.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2015). Supportive relationships and active skill-building strengthen the foundations of resilience: Working paper 13. Cambridge, MA: Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University.Google Scholar
  24. Neuhauser, L., Constantine, W. L., Constantine, N. A., Sokal-Gutierrez, K., Obarski, S. K., Clayton, L., et al. (2007). Promoting prenatal and early childhood health: Evaluation of a statewide materials-based intervention for parents. American Journal of Public Health, 97(10), 1813–1819.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.089532.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Plantin, L., & Daneback, K. (2009). Parenthood, information and support on the internet. A literature review of research on parents and professionals online. BMC Family Practice, 10(1), 34.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-10-34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Shonkoff, J. P., & Richter, L. (2013). The powerful reach of early childhood development: A science-based foundation for sound investment. In P. R. Britto, P. L. Engle & C. M. Super (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood development research and its impact on global policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Svensson, J., Barclay, L., & Cooke, M. (2006). The concerns and interests of expectant and new parents: Assessing learning needs. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 15(4), 18–27.  https://doi.org/10.1624/105812406X151385.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of NursingUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Departments of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Alberta Health ServicesCalgaryCanada
  4. 4.Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations