Advertisement

Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 567–569 | Cite as

Next Steps for Measures of Physical Activity During Pregnancy

  • Lisa Chasan-TaberEmail author
  • Kelly R. Evenson
Letter to the Editor

We appreciate the recent Commentary by Guérin et al. (2018) which was designed to stimulate academic discussion among women’s health researchers regarding how best to measure physical activity (PA) during pregnancy. This topic is particularly important in light of the recent 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report (2018). In brief, while the committee found strong evidence that moderate-intensity PA reduces excessive gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes, and symptoms of postpartum depression, questions remain regarding the impact of PA on preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and postpartum weight loss as well as quality of sleep, quality of life, and symptoms of anxiety and depression both during pregnancy and postpartum. The committee highlighted the importance of future studies designed to elucidate the impact of varying types (e.g., leisure-time, occupational, household, transportation), intensities, and doses of PA on maternal and fetal...

Notes

References

  1. Aune, D., Saugstad, O., Henriksen, T., & Tonstad, S. (2014). Physical activity and the risk of preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology, 25(3), 331–343.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aune, D., Sen, A., Henriksen, T., Saugstad, O., & Tonstad, S. (2016). Physical activity and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(10), 967–997.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonzini, M., Coggon, D., & Palmer, K. T. (2007). Risk of prematurity, low birthweight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activities: A systematic review. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 64(4), 228–243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowles, H. (2012). Measurement of active and sedentary behaviors: Closing the gaps in self-report methods. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(Suppl 1), S1–S4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, C. G., Foster, R. C., Lanningham Foster, L. M., & Smith, K. M. (2012). The modified obstetric metabolic equivalent (MET): Finding a MET that fits in pregnancy. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, 3(3), 159–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chasan-Taber, L., Schmidt, M. D., Roberts, D. E., Hosmer, D., Markenson, G., & Freedson, P. S. (2004). Development and validation of a Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36(10), 1750 (6, quiz 1757–1760).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conway, M., Marshall, M., Schlaff, R., Pfeiffer, K., & Pivarnik, J. (2018). Physical activity device reliability and validity during pregnancy and postpartum. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 50(3), 617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. da Silva, S., Ricardo, L., Evenson, K., & Hallal, P. (2017). Leisure-time physical activity in pregnancy and maternal-child health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Sports Medicine, 47(2), 295–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. DiNallo, J., Symons Downs, D., & Le Masurier, G. (2012). Objectively assessing treadmill walking during the second and third pregnancy trimesters. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9, 21–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Doherty, A., Kelly, P., Kerr, J., Marshall, S., Oliver, M., Badland, H., et al. (2013). Using wearable cameras to categorise type and context of accelerometer-identified episodes of physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, 22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Guérin, E., Ferraro, Z., Adamo, K., & Prud’homme, D. (2018). The need to objectively measure physical activity during pregnancy: Considerations for clinical research and public health impact. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22, 637–641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirby, J., Tibbins, C., Callens, C., Lang, B., Thorogood, M., Tigbe, W., et al. (2012). Young people’s views on accelerometer use in physical activity research: Findings from a user involvement investigation. ISRN Obesity, 2012, 948504.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pettee Gabriel, K. K., Morrow, J. R. Jr., & Woolsey, A. L. (2012). Framework for physical activity as a complex and multidimensional behavior. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(Suppl 1), S11–S18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sternfeld, B., & Goldman Rosas, L. (2012). A systematic approach to selecting an appropriate measure of self-reported physical activity or sedentary behavior. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(Suppl 1), S19–S28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Troiano, R., Pettee Gabriel, K., Welk, G., Owen, N., & Sternfeld, B. (2012). Reported physical activity and sedentary behavior: Why do you ask? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(Suppl 1), S68–S75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Welk, G. (2002). Use of accelerometer-based activity monitors to assess physical activity. In G. Welk (Ed.), Physical activity assessments for health-related research (pp. 125–142). Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  17. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. (2018). 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, School of Public Health & Health SciencesUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina – Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations