Educational Attainment and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Danish Register-Based Study of the Influence of Childhood Social Disadvantage on Later Socioeconomic Disparities in Induced Abortion, Spontaneous Abortion, Stillbirth and Preterm Delivery
- 25 Downloads
Objectives Socioeconomic disparities in pregnancy outcomes have been found across times and places, but there is a lack of studies investigating the underlying causes. The present study investigated the influence of child protective services in the pregnant woman’s family of origin as a proxy of childhood social disadvantage. Methods The study population comprised all registered pregnancies in Denmark during the period from 2000 to 2009 that resulted in an induced abortion, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth or live birth (N = 786,054). Linear regression was used to analyze the associations between educational attainment and pregnancy outcomes in models with and without adjustment for age, parental educational attainment and child protective services in the family of origin. Further, it was tested whether child protective services in the pregnant woman’s family of origin modified the associations between educational attainment and pregnancy outcomes. Results Women with low educational attainment had a higher risk of induced abortion, stillbirth and preterm delivery and a lower risk of spontaneous abortion. These associations were to some extent explained by child protective services in the family of origin. Further, child protective services in the pregnant woman’s family of origin modified the association between educational attainment and risk of preterm delivery. Thus, women with high educational attainment were not found to differ in risk of preterm delivery according to child protective services in the family of origin Conclusions for Practice Information on childhood social disadvantage may enrich our understanding of the socioeconomic disparities in pregnancy outcomes
KeywordsEducational attainment Childhood social disadvantage Abortion Stillbirth Preterm delivery
The authors want to thank Jenny Torssander for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Brøndum, B. (2018). Hvordan går det udsatte børn og unge? [How are disadvantaged children and young people doing?]. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark.Google Scholar
- Conley, D., Strully, K. W., & Bennett, N. G. (2003). The starting gate: Birth weight and life chances. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Hansen, B. H. (2015). Analyse af udvikling i voksenlivet blandt tidligere anbragte børn. København: KL.Google Scholar
- Machin, S. (2006). Social disadvantage and education experiences. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Mortensen, L. H., Maier, A. B., Slagbom, P. E., Pawelec, G., Derhovanessian, E., Petersen, I., … Christensen, K. (2012). Early-life environment influencing susceptibility to cytomegalovirus infection: evidence from the Leiden Longevity Study and the Longitudinal Study of Aging Danish Twins. Epidemiology and Infection, 140(5), 835–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Poulsen, G., Strandberg-Larsen, K., Mortensen, L., Barros, H., Cordier, S., Correia, S., … Andersen, A.-M. N. (2015). Exploring educational disparities in risk of preterm delivery: a comparative study of 12 European birth cohorts. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 29(3), 172–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Denmark. (2017). Children and young people receiving social benefits. Retrieved March 27, 2017, from http://www.dst.dk/en/Statistik/dokumentation/documentationofstatistics/children-and-young-people-receiving-social-benefits.
- Statistics Denmark. (2018). Living conditions. Retrieved August 8, 2018, from http://statbank.dk/10046.
- Ubbesen, M. B. (2013). The Danish child protection system in light of register-based research. Aarhus: Aarhus University.Google Scholar
- Zeitlin, J., Mortensen, L., Prunet, C., Macfarlane, A., Hindori-Mohangoo, A. D., Gissler, M., … Alexander, S. (2016). Socioeconomic inequalities in stillbirth rates in Europe: Measuring the gap using routine data from the Euro-Peristat project. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar