The South Carolina Multigenerational Linked Birth Dataset: Developing Social Mobility Measures Across Generations to Understand Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Adverse Birth Outcomes in the US South
Objectives To describe the creation of a multigenerational linked dataset with social mobility measures for South Carolina (SC), as an example for states in the South and other areas of the country. Methods Using unique identifiers, we linked birth certificates along the maternal line using SC birth certificate data from 1989 to 2014, and compared the subset of records for which linking was possible with two comparison groups on sociodemographic and birth outcome measures. We created four multi-generational social mobility measures using maternal education, paternal education, presence of paternal information, and a summary score incorporating the prior three measures plus payment source for births after 2004. We compared social mobility measures by race/ethnicity. Results Of the 1,366,288 singleton birth certificates in SC from 1989 to 2014, we linked 103,194, resulting in 61,229 unique three-generation units. Mothers and fathers were younger and had lower education, and low birth weight was more common, in the multigenerational linked dataset than in the two comparison groups. Based on the social mobility summary score, only 6.3% of White families were always disadvantaged, compared to 30.4% of Black families and 13.2% of Hispanic families. Moreover, 32.8% of White families were upwardly mobile and 39.1% of Black families were upwardly mobile, but only 29.9% of Hispanic families were upwardly mobile. Conclusions for Practice When states are able to link individuals, birth certificate data may be an excellent source for examining population-level relationships between social mobility and adverse birth outcomes. Due to its location in the Deep South, the multigenerational SC dataset may be particularly useful for understanding racial/ethnic difference in social mobility and birth outcomes.
KeywordsIntergenerational factors Adverse birth outcomes Life course perspective Birth certificates Social mobility
This work was supported by a Faculty Seed Grant from the University of Michigan Institute for Research on Women and Gender. We would also like to thank Alex Cao for assistance with cross-generational data linkage.
- Adding Father to Birth Certificate. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.scdhec.gov/VitalRecords/PaternityAndLegitimation/.
- Alexander, M. (2010). The New Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness (Revised ed.). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
- Alio, A. P., Mbah, A. K., Kornosky, J. L., Wathington, D., Marty, P. J., & Salihu, H. M. (2011). Assessing the impact of paternal involvement on racial/ethnic disparities in infant mortality rates. Journal of Community Health, 36(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-010-9280-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- American FactFinder 2015 ACS 5-year Selected Population Tables. (2017). Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t.
- Castrillio, S. M., Rankin, K. M., David, R. J., & Collins, J. W. (2014). Small-for-gestational age and preterm birth across generations: A population-based study of Illinois births. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(10), 2456–2464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1484-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). 2013 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties.Google Scholar
- Current Population Survey Table Creator. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/cps/data/cpstablecreator.html.
- David, R., Rankin, K., Lee, K., Prachand, N., Love, C., & Collins, J. (2008). The Illinois transgenerational birth file: Life-course analysis of birth outcomes using vital records and census data over decades. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0433-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- David, R. J., & Collins, J. W. Jr. (1990). Bad outcomes in black babies: Race or racism? Ethnicity & disease, 1(3), 236–244.Google Scholar
- Dietz, P. M., England, L. J., Callaghan, W. M., Pearl, M., Wier, M. L., & Kharrazi, M. (2007). A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 21, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00862.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Emanuel, I., Leisenring, W., Williams, M., Kimpo, C., Estee, S., O’Brien, W., & Hale, C. (1999). The Washington State Intergenerational Study of Birth Outcomes: Methodology and some comparisons of maternal birthweight and infant birthweight and gestation in four ethnic groups. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 13(3), 352–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ingram, D., & Franco, S. (2014). 2013 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties. Vital and Health Statistic, 2(166), 1–73.Google Scholar
- Ncube, C. N., Enquobahrie, D. A., Burke, J. G., Ye, F., Marx, J., & Albert, S. M. (2017). Transgenerational transmission of preterm birth risk: The role of race and generational socio-economic neighborhood context. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21(8), 1616–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2251-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Report of the Panel to Evaluate the U.S. Standard Certificates. (2000). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/panelreport_acc.pdf.
- Rothstein, R. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. New York: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
- United Health Foundation. (2015). America’s health rankings: South Carolina. Retrieved from http://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/2015-annual-report/measure/Overall/state/SC.
- Urban and Rural Population by State, 2010. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/geo/www/ua/2010urbanruralclass.html.