Advertisement

How Does the Healthfulness of the US Food Supply Compare to International Guidelines for Marketing to Children and Adolescents?

  • Elizabeth K. DunfordEmail author
  • Shu Wen Ng
  • Lindsey Smith Taillie
Article
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives Food marketing to children is pervasive and linked to increased preference and intake of unhealthy foods. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the only multi-country nutrient criteria, and Chile recently released the world’s most comprehensive regulation to identify foods that should not be marketed to children. Our objective was to examine the proportion of US packaged food and beverage products eligible for marketing to children under the WHO Europe Nutrient Profile Model (NPM) and the 2019 Chilean regulation. Methods Data for this study are from Label Insight’s 2017 Open Access branded food database. Each product was assigned to one of 13 food categories, and nutritional content compared to both the NPM and Chilean criteria. The proportion of US products meeting criteria for marketing to children using both schemes was examined overall and by category. Agreement between the two criteria was examined using Cohen’s Kappa. Results Of 17,740 US products, 21% were eligible to be marketed to children using the WHO criteria and 26% using the Chilean criteria. ‘Egg and egg products’ and ‘Seafood’ had the highest proportion of products eligible for marketing to children under both schemes. ‘Confectionery’ and ‘Snack foods’ had the lowest proportion eligible. Conclusions for practice The WHO NPM and Chilean criteria both restrict less healthy items from being marketed to children. Regulatory agencies in the US developing policies should consider the implementation of nutrient criteria to restrict the marketing of less healthy foods and beverages to children and adolescents.

Keywords

Food marketing Processed foods Public health nutrition Nutrient profiling 

Notes

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grant Nos. 67506, 68793, 70017), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (US) (Grant No. 71837), National Institutes of Health (Grant Nos. R01DK098072, DK56350), Carolina Population Center (Grant No. P2C HD050924) and National Health and Medical Research Council (AU).

Supplementary material

10995_2018_2693_MOESM1_ESM.docx (53 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 53 KB)

References

  1. Better Business Bureau. (2017). Children’s food and beverage advertising initiative. Accessed April 17, 2017, from http://www.bbb.org/council/the-national-partner-program/national-advertising-review-services/childrens-food-and-beverage-advertising-initiative/.
  2. Cairns, G., Angus, K., Hastings, G., & Caraher, M. (2013). Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. A retrospective summary. Appetite, 62, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers, S. A., Freeman, R., Anderson, A. S., & MacGillivray, S. (2015). Reducing the volume, exposure and negative impacts of advertising for foods high in fat, sugar and salt to children: A systematic review of the evidence from statutory and self-regulatory actions and educational measures. Preventive Medicine, 75, 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunford, E., Webster, J., Metzler, A. B., Czernichow, S., Ni Mhurchu, C., Wolmarans, P., et al. (2012). International collaborative project to compare and monitor the nutritional composition of processed foods. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 19, 1326–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Federal Trade Commission. (2012). A review of food marketing to children and adolescents. Accessed April 17, 2017, from https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/review-food-marketing-children-and-adolescents-follow-report/121221foodmarketingreport.pdf.
  6. Galbraith-Emami, S., & Lobstein, T. (2013). The impact of initiatives to limit the advertising of food and beverage products to children: A systematic review. Obesity Reviews, 14, 960–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris, J. L., LoDolce, M., Dembek, C., & Schwartz, M. B. (2015). Sweet promises: Candy advertising to children and implications for industry self-regulation. Appetite, 95, 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris, J. L., Sarda, V., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2013). Redefining “child-directed advertising” to reduce unhealthy television food advertising. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44, 358–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hastings, G., Stead, M., McDermott, L., Forsyth, A., MacKintosh, A. M., Rayner, M., et al. (2003). Review of research on the effects of food promotion to children—Final report. Accessed April 17, 2017, from http://tna.europarchive.org/20110116113217/http:/www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/foodpromotiontochildren1.pdf.
  10. Institute of Medicine. (2006). Food marketing to children and youth: Threat or opportunity? Accessed April 17, 2017, from https://www.nap.edu/read/11514/chapter/1.
  11. Interagency Working Group of Food Marketed to Children. (2011). Preliminary proposed nutrition principles to guide industry self-regulatory efforts. Accessed April 17, 2017, from https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_events/food-marketed-children-forum-interagency-working-group-proposal/110428foodmarketproposedguide.pdf.
  12. Jumpertz, R., Venti, C. A., Le, D. S., Michaels, J., Parrington, S., Krakoff, J., et al. (2013). Food label accuracy of common snack foods. Obesity (Silver Spring), 21, 164–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kraak, V. I., Story, M., Wartella, E. A., & Ginter, J. (2011). Industry progress to market a healthful diet to American children and adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41, 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Label Insight. (2017). The Open Data initiative. Accessed April 17, 2017, from https://www.labelinsight.com/open-data.
  15. Ng, S. W., Slining, M. M., & Popkin, B. M. (2014). Turning point for US diets? Recessionary effects or behavioral shifts in foods purchased and consumed. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99, 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Powell, L. M., Harris, J. L., & Fox, T. (2013). Food marketing expenditures aimed at youth: Putting the numbers in context. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ronit, K., & Jensen, J. D. (2014). Obesity and industry self-regulation of food and beverage marketing: A literature review. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 68, 753–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ustjanauskas, A. E., Harris, J. L., & Schwartz, M. B. (2014). Food and beverage advertising on children’s web sites. Pediatric Obesity, 9, 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. World Cancer Research Fund International. (2017). NOURISHING framework. Accessed April 17, 2017, from http://www.wcrf.org/int/policy/nourishing-framework.
  20. World Health Organization. (2010). Set of recommendations on the marketing of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to children. Accessed April 17, 2017, from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44416/1/9789241500210_eng.pdf.
  21. World Health Organization. (2015). WHO Regional Office for Europe Nutrient Profile Model. Accessed April 17, 2017, from http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/270716/Europe-nutrient-profile-model-2015-en.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Food Policy DivisionThe George Institute for Global HealthSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of NutritionUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations