Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 11, pp 2132–2139 | Cite as

Emergency Contraception in Mexico: Trends in Knowledge and Ever-Use 2006–2014

  • Leo HanEmail author
  • Biani Saavedra-Avendano
  • William Lambert
  • Rongwei Fu
  • Maria I. Rodriguez
  • Alison Edelman
  • Blair Darney


Objectives A package of interventions to introduce emergency contraception (EC) to Mexico was implemented, resulting in the addition of EC to the national family planning guidelines in 2004. We describe EC knowledge and use among women in Mexico over time. Methods We used the 2006, 2009, and 2014 of waves of a nationally representative demographic survey (ENADID). We assessed EC knowledge and usage in women ages 15–29 who are not using permanent methods and tested whether EC knowledge and use is changing over time after controlling for socio-demographic characteristics using logistic regression. Results Our sample included n = 99,223 (population N = 40,234,355) women ages 15–29. Overall, knowledge of EC increased over time: 62% in 2006 to 79% in 2009 to 83% in 2014 (p < 0.001). Among young women who have used contraception (n = 42,883; N = 16,816,701), the proportion that reported EC use increased from 3 to 11% to 29% (p < 0.001). Compared to non-users, women who had ever used EC were more likely to be using no method of contraception (44 vs. 35%) or barrier method (22 vs. 17%). Demographic factors including lower wealth, lower education, indigenous status and rural living are significantly associated with less EC knowledge and use. Stratified multivariate analysis found that demographic disadvantages magnify lower EC use among rural residents compared to non-rural residents. Conclusions for Practice Knowledge and use of EC are growing rapidly in Mexico, but disparities persist in demographically disadvantaged women, particularly those living in rural areas. Women who use EC appear to be at higher risk of unintended pregnancy based on current contraceptive use.


Contraception Emergency contraception ENADID Mexico 



B.D. and B.S. are partially supported by a Society of Family Planning Junior Investigator Award (SFPRF9-JI2). M.R. is a Women’s Reproductive Health Research fellow; Grant 1K12HD085809.


  1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2010). ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 112: Emergency contraception. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 115(5), 1100–1109. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181deff2a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng, L., Che, Y., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2012). Interventions for emergency contraception. In Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from
  3. CONAPO (Consejo Nacional de Poblacion). (2011). Cuadernos de Salud Reproductiva, Repu ́blica Mexicana. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from
  4. Darling, C. A., Davidson, J. K., & Passarello, L. C. (1992). The mystique of first intercourse among college youth: The role of partners, contraceptive practices, and psychological reactions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21(1), 97–117. doi: 10.1007/BF01536984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dehlendorf, C., Rodriguez, M. I., Levy, K., Borrero, S., & Steinauer, J. (2010). Disparities in family planning. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202(3), 214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.022.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellertson, C., Heimburger, A., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Schiavon, R., Mejia, G., Corona, G., … Langer, A. (2002). Information campaign and advocacy efforts to promote access to emergency contraception in Mexico. Contraception, 66(5), 331–337. doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00369-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. ESHRE CapriWorkshop Group, ESHRE Capri Workshop Group, Baird, D. T., Cameron, S., Evers, J. L. H., Gemzell-Danielsson, K., … Crosignani, P. G. (2015). Emergency contraception. Widely available and effective but disappointing as a public health intervention: a review. Human Reproduction, 30(4), 751–760. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev019.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Heimburger, A., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Schiavon, R., Langer, A., Mejia, G., Corona, G., … Ellertson, C. (2002). Emergency contraception in Mexico City: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among providers and potential clients after a 3-year introduction effort. Contraception, 66(5), 321–329. doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(02)00368-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hosmer, D., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. INEGI. (2006). ENADID Informe Final. Retrieved from
  11. INEGI. (2009). ENADID Metodologia y Tabuladis basicos. Retrieved February 5, 2016, from
  12. Instituto Nacional de Salud PublicaINEGI. (2009). ENADID Informe operativo. Retrieved from
  13. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. (n.d.). Panorama educativo de México. Indicadores del Sistema Educativo Nacional 2014. Retrieved March 17, 2016, from;jsessionid=477365009CFEDF0C3D018D92C03764D8?clave=P1B112.
  14. International Consortium ofr Emergency Contraception. (n.d.). Navigating a politically sensitive landscape. Retrieved from
  15. Kolenikov, S., & Angeles, G. (n.d.). The use of discrete data in PCA: Theory, simulations, and applications to socioeconomic indices—MEASURE evaluation [Publication]. Retrieved March 17, 2016, from
  16. Langer, A., Harper, C., Garcia-Barrios, C., Schiavon, R., Heimburger, A., Elul, B., … Ellertson, C. (1999). Emergency contraception in Mexico City: What do health care providers and potential users know and think about it?. Contraception, 60(4), 233–241. doi: 10.1016/S0010-7824(99)00088-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mexico—International Consortium for Emergency Contraception (ICEC). (n.d.). Retrieved from
  18. National Public Health Institute. (2012). National Survey of Health and Nutrition 2012 (ENSANUT). Retrieved June 16, 2015, from
  19. National Survey of Demographic Dynamics (ENADID). (n.d.). Retrieved July 31, 2015, from
  20. Priante, P. S. B., Lubianca, J. N., Cioba, C., Corleta, H., von E., & Capp, E. (2014). Evaluation of emergency contraception use among women receiving gynecological treatment in the Brazilian Amazon. Clinical & Biomedical Research, 34(2), 145–151. Retrieved from
  21. Raymond, E. G., Trussell, J., & Polis, C. B. (2007). Population effect of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: A systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 109(1), 181–188. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000250904.06923.4a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schiappacasse, V., & Diaz, S. (2006). Access to emergency contraception. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 94(3), 301–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.04.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schiavon, R., & Westley, E. (2008). From pilot to mainstream: A decade of working in partnerships to expand access to emergency contraception in Mexico. Global Public Health, 3(2), 149–164. doi: 10.1080/17441690801900837.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Unintended Pregnancy and Induced Abortion in Mexico. (n.d.). Retrieved March 17, 2016, from
  25. Walker, D. M., Torres, P., Gutierrez, J. P., Flemming, K., & Bertozzi, S. M. (2004). Emergency contraception use is correlated with increased condom use among adolescents: Results from Mexico. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(4), 329–334. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.07.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zelnik, M. (n.d.). First intercourse among young Americans. Family Planning Perspectives, 15(2), 64–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.National Institute of Public HealthCenter for Health Systems ResearchCuernavacaMexico
  3. 3.School of Public HealthOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  4. 4.Department of Emergency MedicineOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations