Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 1784–1789 | Cite as

Oregon’s Coordinated Care Organizations and Their Effect on Prenatal Care Utilization Among Medicaid Enrollees

  • Lisa P. OakleyEmail author
  • S. Marie Harvey
  • Jangho Yoon
  • Jeff Luck
Brief Reports


Introduction Previous studies indicate that inadequate prenatal care is more common among women covered by Medicaid compared with private insurance. Increasing the proportion of pregnant women who receive early and adequate prenatal care is a Healthy People 2020 goal. We examined the impact of the implementation of Oregon’s accountable care organizations, Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs), for Medicaid enrollees, on prenatal care utilization among Oregon women of reproductive age enrolled in Medicaid. Methods Using Medicaid eligibility data linked to unique birth records for 2011–2013, we used a pre-posttest treatment–control design that compared prenatal care utilization for women on Medicaid before and after CCO implementation to women never enrolled in Medicaid. Additional stratified analyses were conducted to explore differences in the effect of CCO implementation based on rurality, race, and ethnicity. Results After CCO implementation, mothers on Medicaid had a 13% increase in the odds of receiving first trimester care (OR 1.13, CI 1.04, 1.23). Non-Hispanic (OR 1.20, CI 1.09, 1.32), White (OR 1.20, CI 1.08, 1.33) and Asian (OR 2.03, CI 1.26, 3.27) women on Medicaid were more likely to receive initial prenatal care in the first trimester after CCO implementation and only Medicaid women in urban areas were more likely (OR 1.14, CI 1.05, 1.25) to initiate prenatal care in the first trimester. Conclusion Following Oregon’s implementation of an innovative Medicaid coordinated care model, we found that women on Medicaid experienced a significant increase in receiving timely prenatal care.


Medicaid Prenatal care Health services Accountable care Coordinated care 



This work was supported by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Award Number 1U01DP004783-01 to S. Marie Harvey (PI) and Jeff Luck (PI). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control.


  1. Alexander, G. R., & Kotelchuck, M. (2001). Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: History, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Reports, 116(4), 306–316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. (1985). Standards for obstetric-gynecologic services (6th ed.). Washington, DC: ACOG.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, C. L., Callaghan, W. M., Syverson, C., & Henderson, Z. (2010). Pregnancy-related mortality in the united states, 1998 to 2005. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116(6), 1302–1309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Health Care Strategies. (2016). Medicaid accountable care organization: State update, March 2016. Retrieved from
  5. Conover, C. J., Rankin, P. J., & Sloan, F. A. (2001). Effects of Tennessee Medicaid managed care on obstetrical care and birth outcomes. Journal of Health Polictics, Policy and Law, 26, 1291–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ennis, S., Rios-Vargas, M., & Albert, N. G. (2011). The Hispanic population: 2010. Retrieved from Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Griffin, J. F., Hogan, J. W., Buechner, J. S., & Leddy, T. M. (1999). The effect of a Medicaid managed care program on the adequacy of prenatal care utilization in Rhode Island. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 497–501.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Howard, S. W., Bernell, S. L., Yoon, J., & Luck, J. (2014). Oregon’s coordinated care organizations: A promising and practical reform model. Journal of Health Polictics, Policy and Law, 39(4), 933–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Howard, S. W., Bernell, S. L., Yoon, J., Luck, J., & Ranit, C. M. (2015). Oregon’s experiment in health care delivery and payment reform: Coordinated care organizations replacing managed care. Journal of Health Polictics, Policy and Law, 40(1), 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howell, E. M., Dubay, L., Kenney, G., & Sommers, A. S. (2004). The impact of Medicaid Managed Care on pregnancy women in Ohio: A cohort analysis. Health Services Research, 39(4), 825–846.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Kenney, G., Sommers, A. S., & Dubay, L. (2005). Moving to mandatory Managed Care in Ohio: Impacts on pregnant women and infants. Medical Care, 43(7), 683–690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotelchuck, M. (1994). An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1414–1420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. March of Dimes. (2012). March of Dimes 2012 Premature Birth Report Card: Oregon. Retrieved from
  14. Maternal and Child Health Bureau. (2016). Prenatal services. Retrieved from
  15. McConnell, K. J., Chang, A. M., Cohen, D. J., Wallace, N., Chernew, M. E., McCarty, D., … Smith, J (2014). Oregon’s Medicaid transformation: An innovative approach to holding a health system accountable for spending growth. Healthcare, 2(3), 163–167.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Oregon Health Authority. (2012). Timeline coordinated care organizations. Retrieved from
  17. Oregon Health Authority. (2014). Timeliness of prenatal care guidance document: Oregon health plan. Retrieved from–%20revised%20July%202014.pdf.
  18. Oregon Health Authority. (2015). Oregon vital statistics annual report 2014 volume 1. Retrieved from
  19. Oregon Health Authority. (2016). Oregon’s health system transformation: CCO metrics 2015 final report. Retrieved from
  20. Phelan, S. T. (2008). Components and timing of prenatal care. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 35(3), 339–353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sommers, A. S., Kenney, G. M., & Dubay, L. (2005). Implementation of mandatory Medicaid managed care in Missouri: Impacts for pregnant women. American Journal of Managed Care, 11, 433–442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tai-Seale, M., LoSasso, A. T., Freund, D. A., & Gerber, S. E. (2001). The long-term effects of Medicaid managed care on obstetric care in three California counties. Health Services Research, 36, 751–771.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Quick facts: Oregon. Retrieved from
  24. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2013). Prenatal care utilization. Retrieved from Rockville, MD:
  25. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Healthy people 2020. Retrieved from Washington, DC:
  26. University of Washington. (n.d.). Rural-urban community area codes (RUCAs). Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa P. Oakley
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Marie Harvey
    • 1
  • Jangho Yoon
    • 1
  • Jeff Luck
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Public Health and Human SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations