Advertisement

One Key Question®: First Things First in Reproductive Health

Abstract

Objectives Preconceptional health care is increasingly recognized as important to promotion of healthy birth outcomes. Preconceptional care offers an opportunity to influence pregnancy timing and intent and mother’s health status prior to conception, all predictors of individual outcomes and of inequality in birth outcomes based on race, ethnicity and class. Methods One Key Question, a promising practice developed in Oregon which is now attracting national interest, provides an entry point into preconceptional care by calling on providers to screen for pregnancy intent in well woman and chronic disease care for women of reproductive age. For women who choose not to become pregnant or are not definitive in their pregnancy intent, One Key Question provides an opportunity for provision of or referral to counseling and contraceptive care. Results Adoption of One Key Question and preconceptional care as standard practices will require important shifts in medical practice challenging the longstanding schism between well woman care generally and reproductive care in particular. Adoption will also require shifts in cultural norms which define the onset of pregnancy as the appropriate starting point for attention to infant health. Conclusions for Practice This commentary reviews the case for preconceptional care, presents the rationale for One Key Question as a strategy for linking primary care to preconceptional and/or contraceptive care for women, outlines what is entailed in implementation of One Key Question in a health care setting, and suggests ways to build community support for preconceptional health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

References

  1. Alexander, G. R., & Kotelchuck, M. (2001). Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: History, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Reports, 116(4), 306–316.

  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2015). Committee opinion no. 642 summary: Increasing access to contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 126(4), e44–48.

  3. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2005). The importance of preconception care in the continuum of women’s health care. Retrieved from http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Gynecologic-Practice/The-Importance-of-Preconception-Care-in-the-Continuum-of-Womens-Health-Care.

  4. Ballantyne, J. W. (1901). A plea for a pro-maternity hospital. British Medical Journal, 1(2101), 813–814.

  5. Bello, J. K., Rao, G., & Stulberg, D. B. (2015). Trends in contraceptive and preconception care in United States ambulatory practices. Family Medicine, 47(4), 264–271.

  6. Besculides, M., & Laraque, F. (2005). Racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal mortality: Applying the perinatal periods of risk model to identify areas for intervention. Journal of the National Medical Association, 97(8), 1128–1132.

  7. Borrero, S., Nikolajski, C., Steinberg, J. R., Freedman, L., Akers, A. Y., Ibrahim, S., & Schwarz, E. B. (2015). “It just happens”: A qualitative study exploring low-income women’s perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning. Contraception, 91(2), 150–156.

  8. Boston Public Health Commission. (2015). Boston health equity goals mid-point report. Retrieved from http://www.bphc.org/whatwedo/health-equity-social-justice/Documents/Boston%20Health%20Equity%20Goals%20Midpoint%20Report.pdf.

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Medical conditions. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/preconception/careforwomen/conditions.html.

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). PRAMStat system. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/prams/pramstat/index.html.

  11. Collins, J. W., Rankin, K. M., & David, R. J. (2011). Low birth weight across generations: The effect of economic environment. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(4), 438–445.

  12. Dehlendorf, C., Fox, E., Sobel, L., & Borrero, S. (2016). Patient-centered contraceptive counseling: Evidence to inform practice. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 5(1), 55–63.

  13. Demont-Heinrich, C., Hawkes, A., Ghosh, T., Beam, R., & Vogt, R. (2013). Risk of very low birth weight based on perinatal periods of risk. Public Health Nursing, 31(3), 234–242.

  14. Handler, A., & Johnson, K. (2016). A call to revisit the prenatal period as a focus for action within the reproductive and perinatal care continuum. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 20(11), 2217–2227.

  15. Hatcher, R. A. (2011). In J. Trussell, A. L. Nelson, W. Cates, & D. Kowal (Eds.), Contraceptive technology: Twentieth revised edition. New York, NY: Ardent Media.

  16. Hudson, D. L., Neighbors, H. W., Geronimus, A. T., & Jason, J. S. (2016). Racial discrimination, John Henryism, and depression among African Americans. The Journal of Black Psychology, 42(3), 221–243.

  17. MacDorman, M. F., Declercq, E., Cabral, H., & Morton, C. (2016). Is the United States maternal mortality rate increasing? Disentangling trends from measurement issues. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 128(3), 447–455.

  18. MacDorman, M. F., & Gregory, E.C.W. (2015). Fetal and perinatal mortality: United States, 2013. National Vital Statistics Report, 64(8), 1–24.

  19. Oregon Health Authority. (2014). Effective contraceptive use among women at risk of unintended pregnancy guidance document. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/oha/analytics/CCOData/Effective%20Contraceptive%20Use%20Guidance%20Document.pdf.

  20. Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative. (2015). Defining the medical home. Retrieved from https://www.pcpcc.org/about/medical-home.

  21. Ranji, U., & Salganico, A. (2011). Women’s health care chartbook: key findings from the Kaiser women’s health survey. Retrieved from http://kff.org/womens-health-policy/report/womens-health-care-chartbook-key-findings-from/.

  22. Tindall, E.J. (2009). Ravenswood: Bringing behavioralists into an FQHC. National Council Magazine, 18, 37–38.

  23. Verbiest, S., Malin, C. K., Drummonds, M., & Kotelchuck, M. (2016). Catalyzing a reproductive health and social justice movement. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 20(4), 741–748.

  24. Wood, S. F., Beeson, T., Goldberg, D. G., Mead, K. H., Shin, P., Abdul-Wakil, A., Rui, A., Sahgal, B., Shimony, M., Stevens, H., & Rosenbaum, S. (2015). Patient experiences with family planning in community health centers. Retrieved from https://publichealth.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/Geiger_Gibson_Family_Planning_Report_2015.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Janelle Wylie for assistance with manuscript preparation.

Author information

Correspondence to Deborah Allen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allen, D., Hunter, M.S., Wood, S. et al. One Key Question®: First Things First in Reproductive Health. Matern Child Health J 21, 387–392 (2017) doi:10.1007/s10995-017-2283-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • One Key Question©
  • Preconceptional health
  • Family planning
  • Well woman care