Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining the Prevalence Rates of Preexisting Maternal Medical Conditions and Pregnancy Complications by Source: Evidence to Inform Maternal and Child Research

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives We sought to examine whether there are systematic differences in ascertainment of preexisting maternal medical conditions and pregnancy complications from three common data sources used in epidemiologic research. Methods Diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertensive disorders (GHD), placental abruption and premature rupture of membranes (PROM) among 4821 pregnancies were identified via birth certificates, maternal self-report at approximately 4 months postpartum and by discharge codes from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS), a mandatory New York State hospital reporting system. The kappa statistic (k) was estimated to ascertain beyond chance agreement of outcomes between birth certificates with either maternal self-report or SPARCS. Results GHD was under-ascertained on birth certificates (5.7 %) and more frequently indicated by maternal report (11 %) and discharge data (8.2 %). PROM was indicated more on birth certificates (7.4 %) than maternal report (4.5 %) or discharge data (5.7 %). Confirmation across data sources for some outcomes varied by maternal age, race/ethnicity, prenatal care utilization, preterm delivery, parity, mode of delivery, infant sex, use of infertility treatment and for multiple births. Agreement between maternal report and discharge data with birth certificates was generally poor (kappa < 0.4) to moderate (0.4 ≤ kappa < 0.75) but was excellent between discharge data and birth certificates for GDM among women who underwent infertility treatment (kappa = 0.79, 95 % CI 0.74, 0.85). Conclusions for Practice Prevalence and agreement of conditions varied across sources. Condition-specific variations in reporting should be considered when designing studies that investigate associations between preexisting maternal medical and pregnancy-related conditions with health outcomes over the life-course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, G. R., & Kotelchuck, M. (2001). Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: History, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Reports (Washington, D. C.: 1974), 116(4), 306–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ananth, C. V. (2005). Perinatal epidemiologic research with vital statistics data: Validity is the essential quality. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193(1), 5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bat-Erdene, U., Metcalfe, A., McDonald, S. W., & Tough, S. C. (2013). Validation of canadian mothers’ recall of events in labour and delivery with electronic health records. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13(suppl 1), S3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. C., Best, K. E., Pearce, M. S., Waugh, J., Robson, S. C., & Bell, R. (2013). Cardiovascular disease risk in women with pre-eclampsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Epidemiology, 28(1), 1–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buck Louis, G. M., Hediger, M. L., Bell, E. M., Kus, C. A., Sundaram, R., McLain, A. C., Yeung, E., Hills, E. A., Thoma, M. E., & Druschel, C. M. (2014). Methodology for establishing a population-based birth cohort focusing on couple fertility and children’s development, the Upstate KIDS Study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 28(3), 191–202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buck Louis, G. M., Druschel, C., Bell, E., Stern, J. E., Luke, B., McLain, A., Sundaram, R., & Yeung, E. (2015). Use of assisted reproductive technology treatment as reported by mothers in comparison with registry data: The Upstate KIDS study. Fertility and Sterility, 103(6), 1461–1468.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buka, S. L, Goldstein, J. M, Spartos, E, Tsuang, M. T. (2004). The retrospective measurement of prenatal and perinatal events: Accuracy of maternal recall. Schizophrenia Research, 71(2–3):417–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. H., Savitz, D., Werner, E. F., Pettker, C. M., Goffman, D., Chazotte, C., & Lipkind, H. S. (2013). Maternal morbidity and risk of death at delivery hospitalization. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 122(3), 627–633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B., Bernson, D., Sappenfield, W., Kirby, R. S., Kissin, D., Zhang, Y., Copeland, G., Zhang, Z., & Macaluso, M. (2014). Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on birth certificates: Florida and Massachusetts, 2004–06. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 28(3), 181–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coolman, M., de Groot, C. J., Jaddoe, V. W., Hofman, A., Raat, H., & Steegers, E. A. (2010). Medical record validation of maternally reported history of preeclampsia. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(8), 932–937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DiGiuseppe, D. L., Aron, D. C., Ranbom, L., Harper, D. L., & Rosenthal, G. E. (2002). Reliability of birth certificate data: A multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 6(3), 169–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, J., Savitz, D. A., Stein, C. R., & Engel, S. M. (2012). Maternal ethnicity and pre-eclampsia in New York city, 1995–2003. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 26(1), 45–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland, S. (1996 ). Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. International Journal of Epidemiology, 25(6), 1107–1116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katki, H. A., & Edelstein, D. W. (2011). Compare tests: Estimating agreement and diagnostic accuracy when one test is not conducted on all specimens. r package version 1 0 Available from http://dceg.cancer.gov/bb/tools/CompareTests.

  • Katki, H. A., Li, Y., Edelstein, D. W., & Castle, P. E. (2012). Estimating the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of two diagnostic tests when one test is conducted on only a subsample of specimens. Statistics in Medicine, 31(5), 436–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, R. S. (2001). Invited commentary: Using vital statistics databases for perinatal epidemiology: does the quality go in before the name goes on? American Journal of Epidemiology, 154(10), 889–890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lain, S. J., Hadfield, R. M., Raynes-Greenow, C. H., Ford, J. B., Mealing, N. M., Algert, C. S., & Roberts, C. L. (2012). Quality of data in perinatal population health databases: A systematic review. Medical Care, 50(4), e7–e20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon-Rochelle, M. T., Holt, V. L., Cardenas, V., Nelson, J. C., Easterling, T. R., Gardella, C., & Callaghan, W. M. (2005). The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193(1), 125–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, J. (2012). Through the looking glass: Gestational diabetes as a predictor of maternal and offspring long-term health. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 28(4), 307–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Northam, S., & Knapp, T. R. (2006). The reliability and validity of birth certificates. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing: JOGNN/NAACOG, 35(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. G., Burrows, R. F., Burrows, E. A., & Vermeulen, M. J. (2001). MOS HIP: McMaster outcome study of hypertension in pregnancy. Early Human Development, 64(2), 129–143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, N. E., & Hade, E. M. (2001). Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey’s healthstart program. Annals of Epidemiology, 11(3), 186–193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, F., Lewis, A., Harold, G., van den, B. M., Boivin, J., Hay, D. F., Owen, M. J., & Thapar, A. (2007). Agreement between maternal report and antenatal records for a range of pre and peri-natal factors: The influence of maternal and child characteristics. Early Human Development, 83(8), 497–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. L., Bell, J. C., Ford, J. B., Hadfield, R. M., Algert, C. S., & Morris, J. M. (2008). The accuracy of reporting of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in population health data. Hypertension in Pregnancy: Official Journal of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy, 27(3), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roohan, P. J., Josberger, R. E., Acar, J., Dabir, P., Feder, H. M., & Gagliano, P. J. (2003). Validation of birth certificate data in New York state. Journal of Community Health, 28(5), 335–346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, D. A., Janevic, T. M., Engel, S. M., Kaufman, J. S., & Herring, A. H. (2008). Ethnicity and gestational diabetes in New York city, 1995–2003. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 115(8), 969–978.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, J. A., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G., Wood, A. M., & Carpenter, J. R. (2009). Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and Pitfalls. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 338, b2393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, J. J., Bairey Merz, C. N., Berga, S. L., Miller, V. M., Ouyang, P., Shufelt, C. L., Steiner, M., Wenger, N. K., & Rich-Edwards, J. W. (2013). Maternal recall of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A systematic review. Journal of Women’s Health (2002), 22(1), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szklo, M., & Nieto, J. F. Epidemiology: beyond the basics. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 4 A.D.

  • Troude, P., L’Helias, L. F., Raison-Boulley, A. M., Castel, C., Pichon, C., Bouyer, J., & de La, R. E. (2008). Perinatal factors reported by mothers: Do they agree with medical records?. European Journal of Epidemiology, 23(8), 557–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vinikoor, L. C., Messer, L. C., Laraia, B. A., & Kaufman, J. S. (2010). Reliability of variables on the North Carolina birth certificate: A comparison with directly queried values from a cohort study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 24(1), 102–112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • von, E. E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gotzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(4), 344–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Caggana, M., Sango-Jordan, M., Sun, M., & Druschel, C. M. (2011). Long-term follow-up of children with confirmed newborn screening disorders using record linkage. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 13(10), 881–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, M. (2014). Epidemiology: study design and data analysis. Boca Raton, FL, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmeen, S., Romano, P. S., Schembri, M. E., Keyzer, J. M., & Gilbert, W. M. (2006). Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194(4), 992–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, E., Robledo, C., Boghossian, N., Zhang, C., & Mendola, P. (2014). Developmental origins of cardiovascular disease. Current Epidemiology Reports, 1, 9–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zollinger, T. W., Przybylski, M. J., & Gamache, R. E. (2006). Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records. Annals of Epidemiology, 16(1), 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; contracts #HHSN275201200005C, #HHSN267200700019C). We also would like to acknowledge and thank the Upstate KIDS families and staff for their important contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwina H. Yeung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robledo, C.A., Yeung, E.H., Mendola, P. et al. Examining the Prevalence Rates of Preexisting Maternal Medical Conditions and Pregnancy Complications by Source: Evidence to Inform Maternal and Child Research. Matern Child Health J 21, 852–862 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2177-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2177-8

Keywords

Navigation