Advertisement

Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 20, Supplement 1, pp 103–116 | Cite as

Guidelines and Interventions Related to the Postpartum Visit for Low-Risk Postpartum Women in High and Upper Middle Income Countries

  • Katrina Stumbras
  • Kristin Rankin
  • Rachel Caskey
  • Sadia Haider
  • Arden Handler
Article

Abstract

Objectives A two-part review was undertaken to: (1) summarize current guidelines on the timing and frequency of postpartum follow-up care for generally healthy, non-high risk postpartum women and to delineate the evidence on which these guidelines are based; and, (2) summarize the results of intervention studies focused on increasing utilization of the postpartum visit for generally healthy, non-high risk postpartum women. Methods A review of guidelines from high and upper middle income countries published between 2000 and 2016 in English related to non-high risk postpartum follow-up visits was conducted in 2014–2016 using four databases and additional sources. In addition, articles published between 1990 and 2016 which evaluated interventions from high to upper middle income countries related to increasing attendance at the postpartum visit were gathered using three databases. Results This review located eight guidelines, all of which relied on expert opinion/group consensus as the evidence for their recommendations regarding the timing of the postpartum visit. The review located 19 intervention studies focused on increasing use of the postpartum visit; in 12 there was statistically significant evidence that these approaches improved utilization. However, no intervention strategy was evaluated more than a few times and many of the evaluations were relatively dated. Conclusions Guidelines for the timing of the postpartum visit are variable and are typically based on weak evidence; however, there is support for increased flexibility to meet women’s needs. Additionally, while there is a diverse set of promising interventions to increase utilization of the postpartum visit, there is limited evaluative information. Future initiatives should focus on more rigorous evaluation.

Keywords

Postpartum follow-up care Guidelines Antenatal and postnatal interventions Postpartum visit 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Gwen Smith and Linda Wheal of the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services for their support for the project on which this paper is based. The authors would also like to thank Tierra Williams for her work collecting articles for this review. This document was developed under grant CFDA 93.767 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. However these contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

References

  1. 1.
    Akkerman, D., Cleland, L., Croft, G., Eskuchen, K., Heim, C., Levine, A., Setterlund, L., Stark, C., Vickers, J., & Westby, E. (2012) Institute for clinical systems improvement. Routine Prenatal Care.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2016). Optimizing postpartum care. Committee opinion no. 666. Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 127, e187–e192. https://www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Obstetric-Practice/co666.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20160603T1323206354. Accessed 4 June 2016.
  3. 3.
    Albers, L. L. (2000). Health problems after childbirth. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 45(1), 55–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apgar, B. S., Serlin, D., & Kaufman, A. (2005). The postpartum visit: Is six weeks too late? American Family Physician, 72(12), 2443–2444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belizan, J. M., Barros, F., Langer, A., Farnot, U., Victora, C., & Villar, J. (1995). Impact of health education during pregnancy on behavior and utilization of health resources. Latin American network for perinatal and reproductive research. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 173(3 Pt 1), 894–899.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bensussen-Walls, W., & Saewyc, E. M. (2001). Teen-focused care versus adult-focused care for the high-risk pregnant adolescent: An outcomes evaluation. Public Health Nursing, 18(6), 424–435.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyd, K., Cheney, B., Davis, A., Plumbo, M., Sunyecz, J., & Thomas, M. (2013). A quick reference guide for clinicians: Postpartum counseling. Washington: Association of Reproductive Health Professionals.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown, S., Hudson, D. B., Campbell-Grossman, C., & Yates, B. C. (2014). Health promotion text blasts for minority adolescent mothers. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 39(6), 357–362.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bryant, A. S., Haas, J. S., McElrath, T. F., & McCormick, M. C. (2006). Predictors of compliance with the postpartum visit among women living in healthy start project areas. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10(6), 511–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Buckley, H. B. (1990). Nurse practitioner intervention to improve postpartum appointment keeping in an outpatient family planning clinic. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 2(1), 29–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chapter 6: Intrapartum and postpartum care of the mother. (2012). Guidelines for perinatal care (7th ed., pp. 169–210). Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, B. A., Reeves, M. F., Hayes, J. L., Hohmann, H. L., Perriera, L. K., & Creinin, M. D. (2010). Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116(5), 1079–1087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheng, C. Y., Fowles, E. R., & Walker, L. O. (2006). Continuing education module: Postpartum maternal health care in the United States—A critical review. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 15(3), 34–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chu, S. Y., Callaghan, W. M., & Shapiro-Mendoza, C. K. (2007). Postpartum care visits–11 states and New York City. CDC MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56(50), 1312–1316.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Demott, K., Bick, D., Norman, R., Ritchie, G., Turnbull, N., Adams, C., et al. (2006). Clinical guidelines and evidence review for post natal care: Routine post natal care of recently delivered women and their babies. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eberhard-Gran, M., Garthus-Niegel, S., Garthus-Niegel, K., & Eskild, A. (2010). Postnatal care: A cross-cultural and historical perspective. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 13(6), 459–466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghilarducci, E., & McCool, W. (1993). The influence of postpartum home visits on clinic attendance. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 38(3), 152–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goulet, L., D’Amour, D., & Pineault, R. (2007). Type and timing of services following postnatal discharge: Do they make a difference? Women and Health, 45(4), 19–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grady, M. A., & Bloom, K. C. (2004). Pregnancy outcomes of adolescents enrolled in a CenteringPregnancy program. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 49(5), 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gunn, J., Lumley, J., Chondros, P., & Young, D. (1998). Does an early postnatal check-up improve maternal health: Results from a randomised trial in Australian general practice. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105(9), 991–997.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haran, C., van Driel, M., Mitchell, B. L., & Brodribb, W. E. (2014). Clinical guidelines for postpartum women and infants in primary care-a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14, 51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hulsey, T. M., Laken, M., Miller, V., & Ager, J. (2000). The influence of attitudes about unintended pregnancy on use of prenatal and postpartum care. Journal of Perinatology: Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association, 20(8 Pt 1), 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services. (2014). Report to the general assembly. PA 93-0536. January 2014.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Interconception Health Promotion Initiative & The Research and Evaluation Group, University of Colorado. (2003). Interconception health promotion initiative final report. The Colorado Trust.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jacobson, B. B., Brock, K. A., & Keppler, A. B. (1999). The post birth partnership: Washington state’s comprehensive approach to improve follow-up care. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 13(1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jones, M. E., & Mondy, L. W. (1990). Prenatal education outcomes for pregnant adolescents and their infants using trained volunteers. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 11(5), 437–444. Retrieved from POPLINE database.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kabakian-Khasholian, T., & Campbell, O. M. (2005). A simple way to increase service use: Triggers of women’s uptake of postpartum services. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112(9), 1315–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kabakian-Khasholian, T., & Campbell, O. M. (2007). Impact of written information on women’s use of postpartum services: A randomised controlled trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86(7), 793–798.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kogan, M. D., Leary, M., & Schaetzel, T. P. (1990). Factors associated with postpartum care among Massachusetts users of the maternal and infant care program. Family Planning Perspectives, 22(3), 128–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laken, M. P., & Ager, J. (1995). Using incentives to increase participation in prenatal care. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 85(3), 326–329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Labarere, J., Gelbert-Baudino, N., Ayral, A. S., Duc, C., Berchotteau, M., Bouchon, N., et al. (2005). Efficacy of breastfeeding support provided by trained clinicians during an early, routine, preventive visit: A prospective, randomized, open trial of 226 mother-infant pairs. Pediatrics, 115(2), 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lu, M. C., Kotelchuck, M., Culhane, J. F., Hobel, C. J., Klerman, L. V., & Thorp, J. M, Jr. (2006). Preconception care between pregnancies: The content of internatal care. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10(5 Suppl), S107–S122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lu, M. C., & Prentice, J. (2002). The postpartum visit: Risk factors for nonuse and association with breast-feeding. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 187(5), 1329–1336.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meghea, C. I., Raffo, J. E., Zhu, Q., & Roman, L. (2013). Medicaid home visitation and maternal and infant healthcare utilization. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(4), 441–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium. (2012). Routine prenatal and postnatal care (p. 1). Southfield (MI): Michigan Quality Improvement Consortium.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Piejko, E. (2006). The postpartum visit–Why wait 6 weeks? Australian Family Physician, 35(9), 674–678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Postnatal Care Program Guidelines for Victorian Health Services. (2012) Rep. Department of Health & Human Services, 7 December 2012. https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/about/publications/policiesandguidelines/Postnatal%20Care%20Program%20Guidelines%20for%20Victorian%20Health%20Services.
  38. 38.
    Reproductive Care Program of Nova Scotia. (2002). Healthy babies, healthy families: Postpartum & postnatal guidelines. Nova Scotia, Canada: Nova Scotia Department of Health.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smith, P. B., Weinman, M. L., Johnson, T. C., & Wait, R. B. (1990). Incentives and their influence on appointment compliance in a teenage family-planning clinic. Journal of Adolescent Health Care: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 11(5), 445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Speroff, L., & Mishell, D. R, Jr. (2008). The postpartum visit: It’s time for a change in order to optimally initiate contraception. Contraception, 78(2), 90–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stevens-Simon, C., O’Connor, P., & Bassford, K. (1994). Incentives enhance postpartum compliance among adolescent prenatal patients. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 15(5), 396–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tsai, P. J., Nakashima, L., Yamamoto, J., Ngo, L., & Kaneshiro, B. (2011). Postpartum follow-up rates before and after the postpartum follow-up initiative at Queen Emma clinic. Hawaii Medical Journal, 70(3), 56–59.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tandon, S. D., Cluxton-Keller, F., Colon, L., Vega, P., & Alonso, A. (2013). Improved adequacy of prenatal care and healthcare utilization among low-income Latinas receiving group prenatal care. Journal of Women’s Health, 22(12), 1056–1061.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Trudnak, T. E., Arboleda, E., Kirby, R. S., & Perrin, K. (2013). Outcomes of Latina women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 58(4), 396–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Child Health USA. (2013). Rockville. Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2013.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weir, S., Posner, H. E., Zhang, J., Willis, G., Baxter, J. D., & Clark, R. E. (2011). Predictors of prenatal and postpartum care adequacy in a Medicaid managed care population. Women’s Health Issues: Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, 21(4), 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. (2013). Geneva: World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/97603/1/9789241506649_eng.pdf.
  48. 48.
    World Economic Situation and Prospects: Country Classifications. (2014). Rep. united nations. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wesp/wesp_current/2014wesp_country_classification.pdf.
  49. 49.
    Yonemoto, N., Dowswell, T., Nagai, S., & Mori, R. (2013). Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD009326.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    York, R., Tulman, L., & Brown, K. (2000). Postnatal care in low-income urban African American women: Relationship to level of prenatal care sought. Journal of Perinatology: Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association, 20(1), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sénat, M. V., Sentilhes, L., Battut, A., Benhamou, D., Bydlowski, S., Chantry, A., et al. (2016). Postpartum practice: Guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 202, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrina Stumbras
    • 1
  • Kristin Rankin
    • 2
  • Rachel Caskey
    • 3
  • Sadia Haider
    • 4
  • Arden Handler
    • 5
  1. 1.UIC College of MedicineChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUIC School of Public HealthChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of PediatricsUIC College of MedicineChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUIC College of MedicineChicagoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Community Health SciencesUIC School of Public HealthChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations