Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Could ‘Aunties’ Recruit Pregnant Indigenous Women Who Smoke Into a Trial and Deliver a Cessation Intervention? A Feasibility Study

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective Māori (indigenous New Zealand) women have the highest smoking prevalence rates in New Zealand and whilst pregnant. We hypothesized that community health workers (‘Aunties’) could find pregnant Māori women who smoke, recruit them into a study and deliver an acceptable cessation intervention. The aim of the study was to test the feasibility of such an intervention. Method A community health organization was engaged to, using a participatory approach, conduct a feasibility study. Participants were ten Aunties and the pregnant women the Aunties recruited. The Aunties advised their participants to abstain from smoking, offered a Quitcard (for subsidized nicotine replacement) or referral to local cessation providers. A booklet on healthy eating for pregnancy was given and discussed and the Aunties offered help if needed to register with a lead maternity carer (LMC). All women completed a baseline questionnaire. Semi-structured follow up face-to-face interviews were conducted with a subsample of women and hospital birth records were examined. Descriptive statistics were produced using quantitative data. Qualitative data was deductively analysed. Results During 4 months eight Aunties recruited 67 pregnant women who smoked, 88 % were Māori, 84 % were of low socio economic status and 73 % had up to high school education. Only 36 % of the recruited women had registered with an LMC. The participants described the Aunties as supportive, nice and non-judgmental. The only criticism was a lack of follow up. Aspects of the intervention that the Aunties thought worked well were knowing and being involved with their community, and being able to give a gift pack to the participating women. Insufficient follow up was one aspect that didn’t work well. The infant’s birth record was found for 54 % of the participants. Conclusion Aunties were able to identify and recruit pregnant Māori women who smoked. The study method and intervention were acceptable to Aunties and participants and it was feasible to collect data from the participants’ hospital birth records. Based on this study, with a similar number of Aunties recruiting, it would take 2 years to recruit over 300 participants, which would be sufficient for a stronger controlled trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jaddoe, V. W. V., Verburg, B. O., De Ridder, M. A. J., et al. (2007). Maternal smoking and fetal growth characteristics in different periods of pregnancy: The Generation R Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 165(10), 1207–1215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCowan, L. M. E., Dekker, G. A., Chan, E., Stewart, A., Chappell, L. C., Hunter, M., et al. (2009). Spontaneous preterm birth and small for gestational age infants in women who stop smoking early in pregnancy: Prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 338(7710), 1552.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robson, B., & Harris, R. (Eds.). (2007). Hauora: Maori Standards of Health IV. A study of the years 2000–2005. Wellington: Te Popu Rangahau Hauora a eru Pomare.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barker, D. J. P. (1999). The long-term outcome of retarded fetal growth. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift, 129, 189–196.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lumley, J., Chamberlain, C., Dowswell, T., et al. (2009). Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), CD001055. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub3.

  6. McCowan, L. M., Dekker, G. A., Chan, E., et al. (2009). Spontaneous preterm birth and small for gestational age infants in women who stop smoking early in pregnancy: Prospective cohort study. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 338, b1081.

  7. AlMamun, A., O’Callaghan, F. V., Alati, R., et al. (2006). Does maternal smoking during pregnancy predict the smoking patterns of young adult offspring? A birth cohort study. Tobacco Control, 15(6), 452–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, S. Y., England, L., Dietz, P. M., et al. (2010). Patterns of cigarette and smokeless tobacco use before, during, and after pregnancy among Alaska native and white women in Alaska, 2000–2003. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(3), 365–372. doi:10.1007/s10995-009-0444-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wright, T. E., & Tam, E. (2010). Disparate rates of persistent smoking and drug use during pregnancy of women of Hawaiian ancestry. Ethnicity and Disease, 20(1 Suppl 1), S1-215–S1-218.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heaman, M. I., & Chalmers, K. (2005). Prevalence and correlates of smoking during pregnancy: A comparison of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women in manitoba. Birth, 32(4), 299–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas, D. P., & Glover, M. (2010). Smoking and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Māori children. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 46, 516–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ministry of Health. (2014). Maternity tables 2011: Report on maternity. In Ministry of Health, editor. Wellington.

  13. Passey, M. E., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., & Stirling, J. M. (2013). Supporting pregnant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women to quit smoking: Views of antenatal care providers and pregnant indigenous women. Maternal and Child Health Journal. doi:10.1007/s10995-013-1373-z.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Washio, Y., & Cassey, H. (2014). Systematic review of interventions for racial/ethnic-minority pregnant smokers. Journal of Smoking Cessation. doi:10.1017/jsc.2014.12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Patten, C. A., Windsor, R. A., Renner, C. C., et al. (2010). Feasibility of a tobacco cessation intervention for pregnant Alaska Native women. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12(2), 79–87. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eades, S. J., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Wenitong, M., et al. (2012). An intensive smoking intervention for pregnant aboriginal and Torres strait islander women: A randomised controlled trial. Medical Journal of Australia, 197(1), 42–46. doi:10.5694/mja11.10858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marley, J. V., Atkinson, D., Kitaura, T., et al. (2014). The be our ally beat smoking (BOABS) study, a randomised controlled trial of an intensive smoking cessation intervention in a remote aboriginal Australian health care setting. BMC Public Health. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-32.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Glover, M., Kira, A., Walker, N., et al. (2015). Using incentives to encourage smoking abstinence among pregnant indigenous women? A feasibility study. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19(6), 1393–1399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jenkins, M. (2009). Implementing the ABC approach for smoking cessation: Framework and work programme. Wellington: Ministry of Health Tobacco Policy and Implementation Team.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Allen, M., Barnes, C., Dalley, A., et al. (2012). Best practice framework for dedicated pregnancy smoking cessation services. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Corbett, S., Chelimo, C., & Okesene-Gafa, K. (2013). Barriers to early initiation of antenatal care in a multi-ethnic sample in South Auckland, New Zealand. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 127(1404), 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andrews, J. O., Felton, G., Wewers, M. E., et al. (2004). Use of community health workers in research with ethnic minority women. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(4), 358–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brownstein, J. N., Bone, L. R., Dennison, C. R., et al. (2005). Community health workers as interventionists in the prevention and control of heart disease and stroke. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(5 SUPPL. 1), 128–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Earp, J. A., Eng, E., O’Malley, M. S., et al. (2002). Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: Results from a community trial. American Journal of Public Health, 92(4), 646–654.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kennedy, L. A., Milton, B., & Bundred, P. (2008). Lay food and health worker involvement in community nutrition and dietetics in England: Definitions from the field. Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics, 21(3), 196–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, S., Koniak-Griffin, D., Flaskerud, J. H., et al. (2004). The impact of lay health advisors on cardiovascular health promotion: Using a community-based participatory approach. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19(3), 192–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boulton, A. F., Gifford, H. H., & Potaka-Osborne, M. (2009). Realising whānau ora through community action: The role of Māori community health workers. Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice, 22(2), 188.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson, B. (2003). Maori community health workers: Report of the National Hui. Papakura, Auckland: Te Whiringa Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Brock-Utne, B. (2010). An exploration of the importance of piloting and access as action research. Educational Action Research, 18(3), 359–372. doi:10.1080/09650792.2010.499815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard, 16(40), 33–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Esdonk, T., Glover, M., Kira, A., et al. (2014). Reducing smoking in pregnancy among Māori women: “Aunties” perceptions and willingness to help. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(10), 2316–2322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ministry of Health. (2012). Registration of interest for innovative stop smoking interventions for pregnant women: Reaching the “Hard to Reach”. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bauld, L. (2008). Reaching smokers: How can we encourage more people to use effective treatment? Addiction, 103(6), 1007–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tzelepis, F., Paul, C. L., Walsh, R. A., et al. (2009). Active telephone recruitment to quitline services: Are nonvolunteer smokers receptive to cessation support? Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11(10), 1205–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoving, C., Mudde, A. N., & de Vries, H. (2007). Effect of recruitment method and setting on the composition of samples consisting of adult smokers. Patient Education and Counseling, 65(1), 79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Glover, M., Kira, A., Johnston, V., et al. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to participation in randomized controlled trials by Indigenous people from New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States. Global Health Promotion. doi:10.1177/1757975914528961.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge assistance provided by student interns Tineke van Esdonk and Ingrid Timmermans from Wageninen University, Netherlands. In addition we would like to acknowledge the support and hard work by all the Ringa Atawhai Aunties. We are thankful to the Northland District Health Board records staff. This project was conducted with the support of funding from the NZ Lotteries Commission application number 310314.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marewa Glover.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glover, M., Kira, A., Cornell, T. et al. Could ‘Aunties’ Recruit Pregnant Indigenous Women Who Smoke Into a Trial and Deliver a Cessation Intervention? A Feasibility Study. Matern Child Health J 20, 1211–1221 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-1922-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-1922-3

Keywords

Navigation