Do Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neonatal Mortality Reflect Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal Health Services? Evidence from 48 Low- and Middle-Income Countries
To examine socioeconomic and health system determinants of wealth-related inequalities in neonatal mortality rates (NMR) across 48 low- and middle-income countries.
We used data from Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2006 and 2012. Absolute and relative inequalities for NMR and coverage of antenatal care, facility-based delivery, and Caesarean delivery were measured using the Slope Index of Inequality and Relative Index of Inequality, respectively. Meta-regression was used to assess whether variation in the magnitude of NMR inequalities was associated with inequalities in coverage of maternal health services, and whether country-level economic and health system factors were associated with mean NMR and socioeconomic inequality in NMR.
Of the three maternal health service indicators examined, the magnitude of socioeconomic inequality in NMR was most strongly related to inequalities in antenatal care. NMR inequality was greatest in countries with higher out-of-pocket health expenditures, more doctors per capita, and a higher adolescent fertility rate. Determinants of lower mean NMR (e.g., higher government health expenditures and a greater number of nurses/midwives per capita) differed from factors associated with lower NMR inequality.
Reducing the financial burden of maternal health services and achieving universal coverage of antenatal care may contribute to a reduction in socioeconomic differences in NMR. Further investigation of the mechanisms contributing to these cross-national associations seems warranted.
KeywordsNeonatal mortality Maternal health services Socioeconomic inequality Meta-regression Low- and middle-income countries
Sam Harper was supported by a Chercheur-boursier Junior 2 from the Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec (FRSQ). Jay Kaufman was supported by the Canada Research Chairs programme.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Oestergaard, M. Z., Inoue, M., Yoshida, S., Mahanani, W. R., Gore, F. M., Cousens, S., et al. (2011). Neonatal mortality levels for 193 countries in 2009 with trends since 1990: A systematic analysis of progress, projections, and priorities. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), e1001080. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001080.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.You, D., New, J. R., & Wardlaw, T. (2012). Levels and Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2012. New York, NY: United Nations Children’s Fund.Google Scholar
- 4.REMOVED FOR PEER REVIEWGoogle Scholar
- 7.WHO. (2014). Every Newborn: An action plan to end preventable deaths. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.everynewborn.org/Documents/Full-action-plan-EN.pdf.
- 12.Målqvist, M., Yuan, B., Trygg, N., Selling, K., & Thomsen, S. (2013). Targeted interventions for improved equity in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66453. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066453.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.World Health Organization, UNFPA, United Nations, AMDD. (2009). Monitoring emergency obstetric care: A handbook. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/…/obstetric_monitoring.pdf.
- 19.Rutstein, S. O., & Johnson, K. (2004). The DHS wealth index. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro.Google Scholar
- 21.Schell, C. O., Reilly, M., Rosling, H., Peterson, S., & Ekström, A. M. (2007). Socioeconomic determinants of infant mortality: A worldwide study of 152 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35(3), 288–297. doi:10.1080/14034940600979171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Sterne, J. (2009). Meta-analysis in Stata: An updated collection from the Stata Journal (1st ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
- 25.Harbord, R. M., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2008). Meta-regression in Stata. The Stata Journal, 8(4), 493–519.Google Scholar
- 26.StataCorp. (n.d.). Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
- 28.Brearley, L., Marten, R., & O’Connell, T. (2013). Universal Health Coverage: A commitment to close the gap. London, UK: Save the Children. Retrieved from http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/images/Universal_health_coverage.pdf.
- 33.Cavallaro, F. L., Cresswell, J. A., França, G. V., Victora, C. G., Barros, A. J., & Ronsmans, C. (2013). Trends in caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: Cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(12), 914–922.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Gwatkin, D., Rutstein, S. O., Johnson, K., Suliman, E., Wagstaff, A., & Amouzou, A. (2007). Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPAH/Resources/IndicatorsOverview.pdf.
- 35.Harvey, S. A., Blandón, Y. C. W., McCaw-Binns, A., Sandino, I., Urbina, L., Rodríguez, C., et al. (2007). Are skilled birth attendants really skilled? A measurement method, some disturbing results and a potential way forward. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(10), 783–790. doi:10.1590/S0042-96862007001000015.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar