Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 56–65 | Cite as

Preventive Effects on Birth Outcomes: Buffering Impact of Maternal Stress, Depression, and Anxiety

  • Mark E. Feinberg
  • Damon E. Jones
  • Michael E. RoettgerEmail author
  • Michelle L. Hostetler
  • Kari-Lyn Sakuma
  • Ian M. Paul
  • Deborah B. Ehrenthal



Although maternal stress, anxiety, and depression have been linked to negative birth outcomes, few studies have investigated preventive interventions targeting maternal mental health as a means of reducing such problems. This randomized controlled study examines whether Family Foundations (FF)—a transition to parenthood program for couples focused on promoting coparenting quality, with previously documented impact on maternal stress, depression, and anxiety—can buffer the negative effects of maternal mental health problems.


To assess the effects of FF, we used a randomized block design with a sample of 259 expectant mothers assigned to FF or a control condition and analyzed using propensity score models. We examine two-way interactions of condition (intervention vs. control) with maternal mental health problems (financial stress, depression, and anxiety) on birth outcomes (birth weight, days in hospital for mothers and infants). For birth weight, we assess whether intervention effects depend on length of gestation by including a third interaction term.


FF buffered (p < 0.05) the negative impact of maternal mental health problems on birth weight and both mother and infant length of post-partum hospital stay. For birth weight, assignment to FF was associated with higher birth weight for infants born before term.


These results demonstrate that a psycho-educational program for couples focused on enhancing mutual coparental support, with preventive effects on maternal mental health, can reduce incidence of birth problems among women at elevated risk. Such improvements in birth outcomes could translate into substantial reductions in public and personal healthcare costs. Future work should assess mediating mechanisms of intervention impact and cost-benefit ratio of the intervention.

Clinical trials registration

The Family Foundations follow-up intervention study is currently registered with The study identifier is NCT01907412.


Prenatal stress Depression Anxiety Birth weight Length of hospital stay Coparenting Family Foundations 



Family Foundations


Adverse birth outcomes



This study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Development (RO1 HD058529-02), Mark E. Feinberg, principal investigator. Dr. Feinberg created the Family Foundations program and is the owner of a private company, Family Gold, which disseminates the Family Foundations program. Dr. Feinberg’s financial interest has been reviewed by the Institutional Review Board and the Conflict of Interest Committee at The Pennsylvania State University.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding source

All phases of this study were supported by National Institute of Child and Human Development Grant RO1 HD058529-02

Financial disclosure

Dr. Mark Feinberg created the Family Foundations program and is the owner of a private company, Family Gold, which disseminates the Family Foundations program. Dr. Feinberg’s financial interest has been reviewed by the Institutional Review Board and the Conflict of Interest Committee at The Pennsylvania State University. The remaining authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Mark Feinberg developed the Family Foundations program and is the owner of a private company, Family Gold, which disseminates the program. Dr. Feinberg’s conflict of interest has been reviewed by the Institutional Review Board and the Conflict of Interest Committee at The Pennsylvania State University. All other authors, Dr. Deborah Ehrenthal, Dr. Michelle Hostetler, Dr. Damon Jones, Dr. Kari-Lyn Sakuma, Dr. Ian Paul, and Dr. Michael Roettger, declare no potential conflicts of interest from publication of this study.

Integrity of research and reporting

All aspects of this study, including design, implementation and analysis, have been approved by the Penn State Institutional Review Board, and have followed the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.


  1. 1.
    Armstrong, M., Gonzales, O. V., Lieberman, L., Carpenter, D., Partoja, P., & Escobar, G. (2003). Perinatal substance abuse intervention in obstetric clinics decreases adverse neonatal outcomes. Journal of Perinatology, 1, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baibazarova, E., van de Beek, C., Cohen-Kettenis, P., Buitelaa, J., Shelton, K., & van Goozen, S. (2013). Influence of prenatal maternal stress, maternal plasma cortisol and cortisol in the amniotic fluid on birth outcomes and child temperament at 3 months. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(6), 907–915.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barros, F. C., Bhutta, Z. A., Batra, M., Hansen, T. N., Victora, C. G., & Rubens, C. E. (2010). Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (3 of 7): evidence for effectiveness of interventions. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10(1), S3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beijers, R., Jansen, J., Riksen-Walraven, M., & de Weerth, C. (2010). Maternal prenatal anxiety and stress predict infant illnesses and health complaints. Pediatrics, 126(2), e401–e409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhutta, A. T., Cleves, M. A., Casey, P. H., Cradock, M. M., & Anand, K. J. S. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(6), 728–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blencowe, H., Cousens, S., Oestergaard, M., Chou, D., Moller, A., Narwal, R., & Lawn, J. (2012). National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet, 379(9832), 2162–2172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buss, C., Davis, E. P., Shahbaba, B., Pruessner, J. C., Head, K., & Sandman, C. A. (2012). Maternal cortisol over the course of pregnancy and subsequent child amygdala and hippocampus volumes and affective problems. National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109(20), E1312–E1319. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201295109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buss, C., Entringer, S., Swanson, J., & Wadhwa, P. (2012). The role of stress in brain development: The gestational environment’s long-term effects on the brain. Cerebrum, 4.
  9. 9.
    Clements, K., Barfield, W., Ayadi, M., & Wilber, N. (2007). Preterm birth-associated cost of early intervention services: An analysis by gestational age. Pediatrics, 119(4), 866–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Conde, A., Figueiredo, B., Tendais, I., Teixeira, C., Costa, R., Pacheco, A., & Nogueira, R. (2010). Mother’s anxiety and depression and associated risk factors during early pregnancy: Effects on fetal growth and activity at 20–22 weeks of gestation. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 31(2), 70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conley, D., Strully, K. W., & Bennett, N. G. (2003). The starting gate: birth weight and life chances. Oakland: Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curhan, G. C., Willett, W. C., Rimm, E. B., Spiegelman, D., Ascherio, A. L., & Stampfer, M. J. (1996). Birth weight and adult hypertention, diabetes mellitus, and obesity in US men. Circulation, 94(12), 3246–3250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Curtis, L. H., Hammill, B. G., Eisenstein, E. L., Kramer, J. M., & Anstrom, K. J. (2007). Using inverse probability-weighted estimators in comparative effectiveness analyses with observational databases. Medical Care, 45(10), S103–S107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Entringer, S., Buss, C., Shirtcliff, E., et al. (2010). Attenuation of maternal psychophysiological stress responses and the maternal cortisol awakening response over the course of human pregnancy. Stress, 3, 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feinberg, M. E. (2002). Coparenting and the transition to parenthood: A framework for prevention. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 173–195.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feinberg, M. E. (2003). The internal structure and ecological context of coparenting: A framework for research and intervention. Parenting: Science and Practice, 3, 95–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feinberg, M. E., Jones, D., Hostetler, M., Roettger, M., Paul, I., & Ehrenthal, D. (2015, Under Review). Couple-focused prevention at the transition to parenthood, a randomized trial: Effects on coparenting, parenting, family violence, and parent and child adjustment.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feinberg, M. E., Jones, D. E., Kan, M. L., & Goslin, M. C. (2010). Effects of family foundations on parents and children: 3.5 years after baseline. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 532–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feinberg, M. E., Jones, D. E., Roettger, M. E., Solmeyer, A., & Hostetler, M. L. (2014). Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of family foundations: Effects on children’s emotional, behavioral, and school adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(6), 821–831. doi: 10.1037/fam0000037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feinberg, M. E., & Kan, M. L. (2008). Establishing Family Foundations: Intervention effects on coparenting, parent/infant well-being, and parent–child relations. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(2), 253–263.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feinberg, M. E., Kan, M. L., & Goslin, M. C. (2009). Enhancing coparenting, parenting, and child self-regulation: Effects of family foundations 1 year after birth. Prevention Science, 10(3), 276–285. doi: 10.1007/s11121-009-0142-0.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feinberg, M. E., Roettger, M., Jones, D. E., Paul, I. M., & Kan, M. L. (2015). Effects of a psychosocial couple-based prevention program on adverse birth outcomes. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19, 102–111. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1500-5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Freedman, D. A., & Berk, R. A. (2008). Weighting regressions by propensity scores. Evaluation Review, 32(4), 392–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gilbert, W., Nesbitt, T., & Danielsen, B. (2003). The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 102(3), 488–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldenberg, R. L., Culhane, J. F., Iams, J. D., & Romero, R. (2008). Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. The Lancet, 371(9606), 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grote, N., Bridge, J., Gavin, A., Melville, J., Iyengar, S., & Katon, W. (2010). A meta-analysis of depression during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(10), 1012–1024.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2014). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (Vol. 11). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hack, M., Flannery, D. J., Schluchter, M., Cartar, L., Borawski, E., & Klein, N. (2002). Outcomes in young adulthood for very-low-birth-weight infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(3), 149–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hack, M., Klein, N. K., & Taylor, H. G. (1995). Long-term developmental outcomes of low birth weight infants. The Future of Children, 5(1), 176–196. doi: 10.2307/1602514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hillhouse, E. W., & Grammatopoulos, D. K. (2002). Role of stress peptides during human pregnancy and labour. Reproduction, 124, 323–329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hobel, C., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Roesch, S., Castro, L., & Arora, C. (1999). Maternal plasma corticotropin-releasing hormone associated with stress at 20 weeks’ gestation in pregnancies ending in preterm delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 180(1 pt 3), S257–S263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Horta, B. L., Victora, C. G., Menezes, A. M., Halpern, R., & Barros, F. C. (1997). Low birthweight, preterm births and intrauterine growth retardation in relation to maternal smoking. Pediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 11(2), 140–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Howe, G. W., Caplan, R. D., Foster, D., Lockshin, M., & McGrath, C. (1995). When couples cope with job loss: A strategy for developing and testing preventive interventions. In L. R. Murphy & J. J. Hurrell (Eds.), Job stress interventions (pp. 139–157). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Imbens, G. W. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika, 87(3), 706–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jones, D. E., Feinberg, M. E., & Hostetler, M. L. (2014). Costs to implement an effective transition-to-parenthood program for couples: Analysis of the Family Foundations program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 44, 59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.02.001.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kessler, R. C., Turner, B., & House, J. S. (1988). Effects of unemployment on health in a community survey: Main, modifying, and mediating effects. Journal of Social Issues, 44(4), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lawn, J., Gravett, M., Nunes, T., Rubens, C., Stanton, C., Group, G. R., & Zaentz, R. (2010). Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (1 of 7): Definitions, description of the burden and opportunities to improve data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 10(Supp 1), S1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leonardi-Bee, J., Britton, J., & Venn, A. (2011). Secondhand smoke and adverse fetal outcomes in nonsmoking pregnant women: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 127(4), 734–741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Martinez, F. D., Wright, A. L., & Taussig, L. M. (1994). The effect of paternal smoking on the birthweight of newborns whose mothers did not smoke. Group Health Medical Associates American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1489–1491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moutquin, J. M. (2003). Socio-economic and psychosocial factors in the management and prevention of preterm labour. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 110(20), 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nagahawatte, T. N., & Goldenberg, R. L. (2008). Poverty, maternal health, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1136(1), 80–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nosarti, C., Reichenberg, A., Murray, R. M., Cnattingius, S., Lambe, M. P., Yin, L., & Hultman, C. M. (2012). Preterm birth and psychiatric disorders in young adult life. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(6), 610–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Osborne, J. W., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(6).
  44. 44.
    Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schetter, C. D., & Tanner, L. (2012). Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: Implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 25(2), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Snegovskikh, V., Park, J. S., & Norwitz, E. R. (2006). Endocrinology of parturition. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 35(1), 173–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Solmeyer, A. R., Feinberg, M. E., Coffman, D. L., & Jones, D. E. (2014). Effects of the family foundations prevention program on coparenting and child adjustment: A mediation analysis. Prevention Science, 15, 213–223.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait anxiety inventory (form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    St John, E., Nelson, K., Cliver, S., Bishnoi, R., & Goldenberg, R. (2000). Cost of neonatal care according to gestational age at birth and survival status. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 182(pt1), 170–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Strully, K. W., Rehkopf, D. H., & Xuan, Z. (2010). Effects of prenatal poverty on infant health state earned income tax credits and birth weight. American Sociological Review, 75(4), 534–562.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2012). Hospital adjusted expenses per inpatient day. State Health Facts: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wadhwa, P. (2005). Psychoneuroendocrine processes in human pregnancy influence fetal development and health. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30, 724–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wadhwa, P., Entringer, S., Buss, C., & Lu, M. (2011). The contribution of maternal stress to preterm birth: Issues and considerations. Clinics in Perinatology, 38(3), 351–384.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark E. Feinberg
    • 1
  • Damon E. Jones
    • 1
  • Michael E. Roettger
    • 5
    Email author
  • Michelle L. Hostetler
    • 1
  • Kari-Lyn Sakuma
    • 2
  • Ian M. Paul
    • 3
  • Deborah B. Ehrenthal
    • 4
  1. 1.Edna Bennett Pearce Prevention Research CenterPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Oregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.Department of PediatricsPenn State College of MedicineHersheyUSA
  4. 4.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  5. 5.The Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations