Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 19, Issue 11, pp 2512–2522 | Cite as

Birth Outcomes in a Disaster Recovery Environment: New Orleans Women After Katrina

  • Emily W. Harville
  • Gloria Giarratano
  • Jane Savage
  • Veronica Barcelona de Mendoza
  • TrezMarie Zotkiewicz
Article

Abstract

Objectives

To examine how the recovery following Hurricane Katrina affected pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

308 New Orleans area pregnant women were interviewed 5–7 years after Hurricane Katrina about their exposure to the disaster (danger, damage, and injury); current disruption; and perceptions of recovery. Birthweight, gestational age, birth length, and head circumference were examined in linear models, and low birthweight (<2500 g) and preterm birth (<37 weeks) in logistic models, with adjustment for confounders.

Results

Associations were found between experiencing damage during Katrina and birthweight (adjusted beta for high exposure = −158 g) and between injury and gestational age (adjusted beta = −0.5 days). Of the indicators of recovery experience, most consistently associated with worsened birth outcomes was worry that another hurricane would hit the region (adjusted beta for birthweight: −112 g, p = 0.08; gestational age: −3.2 days, p = 0.02; birth length: −0.65 cm, p = 0.06).

Conclusions

Natural disaster may have long-term effects on pregnancy outcomes. Alternately, women who are most vulnerable to disaster may be also vulnerable to poor pregnancy outcome.

Keywords

Disaster Pregnancy Birthweight 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by NIH Grant R03 NR012052 to G.G.

Supplementary material

10995_2015_1772_MOESM1_ESM.doc (342 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 342 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Census Bureau: State and County QuickFacts. New Orleans (city), Louisiana. 2015. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/22/2255000.html. Accessed March 20, 2015 2015.
  2. 2.
    Plyer, A. (2013). Facts for features: Hurricane Katrina recovery. Greater New Orleans Community Data Center, New Orleans, LA. https://gnocdc.s3.amazonaws.com/reports/GNOCDC_HurricaneKatrinaRecovery.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2013.
  3. 3.
    New Orleans residents say recovery is making progress, but many believe the gulf oil spill will be more damaging than Katrina. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA. 2010. http://kff.org/disparities-policy/press-release/new-orleans-residents-say-recovery-is-making-progress-but-many-believe-the-gulf-oil-spill-will-be-more-damaging-than-katrina/
  4. 4.
    Paxson, C., Fussell, E., Rhodes, J., et al. (2012). Five years later: Recovery from post-traumatic stress and psychological distress among low-income mothers affected by Hurricane Katrina. Social Science and Medicine, 74, 150–157.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McLaughlin, K. A., Berglund, P., Gruber, M. J., et al. (2011). Recovery from PTSD following Hurricane Katrina. Depression and Anxiety, 28(6), 439–446. doi: 10.1002/da.20790.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harville, E., Xiong, X., & Buekens, P. (2010). Disasters and perinatal health: A systematic review. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 65(11), 713–728. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31820eddbe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xiong, X., Harville, E. W., Mattison, D. R., et al. (2008). Exposure to Hurricane Katrina, post-traumatic stress disorder and birth outcomes. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 336(2), 111–115.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harville, E. W., Tran, T., Xiong, X., et al. (2010). Population changes, racial/ethnic disparities, and birth outcomes in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 4(Suppl 1), S39–S45. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Mathews, T. J., et al. (2009). The effect of Hurricane Katrina: Births in the U. S. Gulf Coast Region, before and after the storm. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58(2), 1–28, 32.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freedy, J. R., Shaw, D. L., Jarrell, M. P., et al. (1992). Towards an understanding of the psychological impact of natural disasters: An application of the conservation resources stress model. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5(3), 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freedy, J. R., Saladin, M. E., Kilpatrick, D. G., et al. (1994). Understanding acute psychological distress following natural disaster. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 7(2), 257–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, B. W., & Freedy, J. R. (2000). Psychosocial resource loss as a mediator of the effects of flood exposure on psychological distress and physical symptoms. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13(2), 349–357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ehrlich, M., Harville, E., Xiong, X., et al. (2010). Loss of resources and hurricane experience as predictors of postpartum depression among women in southern Louisiana. Journal of Womens Health (Larchmt), 19(5), 877–884. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sattler, D. N., Preston, A. J., Kaiser, C. F., et al. (2002). Hurricane Georges: a cross-national study examining preparedness, resource loss, and psychological distress in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, and the United States. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15(5), 339–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joseph, N. T., Matthews, K. A., & Myers, H. F. (2013). Conceptualizing health consequences of Hurricane Katrina from the perspective of socioeconomic status decline. Health Psychology,. doi: 10.1037/a0031661.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wen, J., Shi, Y. K., Li, Y. P., et al. (2012). Quality of life, physical diseases, and psychological impairment among survivors 3 years after Wenchuan earthquake: A population based survey. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043081.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arata, C. M., Picou, J. S., Johnson, G. D., et al. (2000). Coping with technological disaster: An application of the conservation of resources model to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13(1), 23–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holgersen, K. H., Klockner, C. A., Boe, H. J., et al. (2011). Disaster survivors in their third decade: Trajectories of initial stress responses and long-term course of mental health. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24(3), 334–341. doi: 10.1002/jts.20636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sherrieb, K., & Norris, F. H. (2013). Public health consequences of terrorism on maternal-child health in New York city and Madrid. Journal of Urban Health., 90(3), 369–387. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9769-4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    March of Dimes Foundation. (2014). Peristats: Louisiana. http://www.marchofdimes.com/Peristats/ViewTopic.aspx?reg=22&top=5&lev=0&slev=4. Accessed March 20, 2014.
  22. 22.
    Norris, F. H., Perilla, J. L., Riad, J. K., et al. (1999). Stability and change in stress, resources, and psychological morbidity: Who suffers and who recovers: Findings from Hurricane Andrew. Anxiety Stress Coping, 12, 363–396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harville, E. W., Xiong, X., Pridjian, G., et al. (2009). Postpartum mental health after Hurricane Katrina: A cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 9(1), 21.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xiong, X., Harville, E. W., Mattison, D. R., et al. (2010). Hurricane Katrina experience and the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression among pregnant women. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 5(3), 181–187.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harville, E. W., Xiong, X., Smith, B. W., et al. (2011). Combined effects of Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Gustav on the mental health of mothers of small children. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18(4), 288–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01658.x.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    KaiserFamilyFoundation. (2007). Giving voice to the people of New Orleans: The Kaiser Post-Katrina baseline survey. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/pomr051007pkg.cfm Accessed July 30, 2007.
  27. 27.
    Murray, D., & Cox, J. L. (1990). Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh depression scale. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 8, 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bergink, V., Kooistra, L., Lambregtse-van den Berg, M. P., et al. (2011). Validation of the Edinburgh Depression Scale during pregnancy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 70(4), 385–389. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.07.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matthey, S. (2004). Calculating clinically significant change in postnatal depression studies using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Journal of Affective Disorders, 78(3), 269–272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Herman, D. S., et al. (Eds). (1993). The PTSD checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. In 9th annual conference of the international society of traumatic stress studies, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ventureyra, V. A., Yao, S. N., Cottraux, J., et al. (2002). The validation of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Scale in posttraumatic stress disorder and nonclinical subjects. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 71(1), 47–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yali, A. M., & Lobel, M. (1999). Coping and distress in pregnancy: an investigation of medically high risk women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 20(1), 39–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhou, X. H., Eckert, G. J., & Tierney, W. M. (2001). Multiple imputation in public health research. Statistics in Medicine, 20(9–10), 1541–1549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hapsari, E. D., Widyawati, Nisman W. A., et al. (2009). Change in contraceptive methods following the Yogyakarta earthquake and its association with the prevalence of unplanned pregnancy. Contraception, 79(4), 316–322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kissinger, P., Schmidt, N., Sanders, C., et al. (2007). The effect of the Hurricane Katrina disaster on sexual behavior and access to reproductive care for young women in New Orleans. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34(11), 883–886.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rogal, S. S., Poschman, K., Belanger, K., et al. (2007). Effects of posttraumatic stress disorder on pregnancy outcomes. Journal of Affective Disorders, 102(1–3), 137–143.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Morland, L., Goebert, D., Onoye, J., et al. (2007). Posttraumatic stress disorder and pregnancy health: Preliminary update and implications. Psychosomatics, 48(4), 304–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rose, D., Bodor, J. N., Rice, J. C., et al. (2011). The effects of Hurricane Katrina on food access disparities in New Orleans. American Journal of Public Health, 101(3), 482–484. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2010.196659.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lowe, S. R., Chan, C. S., & Rhodes, J. E. (2011). The impact of child-related stressors on the psychological functioning of lower-income mothers after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Family Issues, 32(10), 1303–1324. doi: 10.1177/0192513x11412492.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rendall, M. S. (2011). Break-up of New Orleans households after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(3), 654–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00837.x.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harville, E. W., Taylor, C. A., Tesfai, H., et al. (2011). Experience of Hurricane Katrina and reported intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(4), 833–845. doi: 10.1177/0886260510365861.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dunkel Schetter, C. (2011). Psychological science on pregnancy: Stress processes, biopsychosocial models, and emerging research issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 531–558. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily W. Harville
    • 1
  • Gloria Giarratano
    • 2
  • Jane Savage
    • 2
    • 3
  • Veronica Barcelona de Mendoza
    • 1
    • 2
  • TrezMarie Zotkiewicz
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of EpidemiologyTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Department of NursingLouisiana State University Health Sciences CenterNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Department of NursingLoyola UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  4. 4.Independent ScholarNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations