Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Receiving Versus Being Denied an Abortion and Subsequent Tobacco Use

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The negative health consequences of tobacco use are well documented. Some research finds women receiving abortions are at increased risk of subsequent tobacco use. This literature has methodological problems, most importantly, inappropriate comparison groups. This study uses data from the Turnaway Study, a longitudinal study of women who all sought, but did not all receive, abortions at 30 facilities across the United States. Participants included women presenting just before an abortion facility’s gestational age limit who received abortions (Near Limit Abortion Group, n = 452), just after the gestational limit who were denied abortions (Turnaways, n = 231), and who received first trimester abortions (First Trimester Abortion Group, n = 273). This study examined the association between receiving versus being denied an abortion and subsequent tobacco use over 2-years. Trajectories of tobacco use over 2 years were compared using multivariate mixed effects regression. Women receiving abortion maintained their level of tobacco use over 2 years. Women denied abortion initially had lower levels of tobacco use than women receiving abortion, but increased their tobacco use from 1 week through 12–18 months post-abortion seeking and then decreased their use by 2 years post-abortion seeking. Baseline parity modified these associations. Receiving an abortion was not associated with an increase in tobacco use over time. Overall, women who carry unwanted pregnancies to term appear to demonstrate similar cessation and resumption patterns to other pregnant women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. USDHHS. (2001). Women and smoking: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: Office on Smoking and Health.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blizzard, L., Ponsonby, A. L., Dwyer, T., et al. (2003). Parental smoking and infant respiratory infection: How important is not smoking in the same room with the baby? American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 482–488.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ladomenou, F., Kafatos, A., & Galanakis, E. (2009). Environmental tobacco smoke exposure as a risk factor for infections in infancy. Acta Paediatrica, 98(7), 1137–1141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liebrechts-Akkerman, G., Lao, O., Liu, F., et al. (2011). Postnatal parental smoking: An important risk factor for SIDS. European Journal of Pediatrics, 170(10), 1281–1291.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tong, V. T., Jones, J. R., Dietz, P. M., et al. (2009). Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 31 sites, 2000–2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 58(SS04), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lelong, N., Kaminski, M., Saurel-Cubizolles, M. J., et al. (2001). Postpartum return to smoking among usual smokers who quit during pregnancy. The European Journal of Public Health, 11(3), 334–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahn, R. S., Certain, L., & Whitaker, R. C. (2002). A reexamination of smoking before, during, and after pregnancy. American Journal of Public Health, 92(11), 1801–1808.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carmichael, S. L., & Ahluwalia, I. B. (2000). Correlates of postpartum smoking relapse: Results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(3), 193–196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Colman, G. J., & Joyce, T. (2003). Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy in ten states. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(1), 29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fingerhut, L. A., Kleinman, J. C., & Kendrick, J. S. (1990). Smoking before, during, and after pregnancy. American Journal of Public Health, 80(5), 541–544.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Solomon, L., & Quinn, V. (2004). Spontaneous quitting: Self-initiated smoking cessation in early pregnancy. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6(Suppl 2), S203–S216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park, E. R., Chang, Y., Quinn, V., et al. (2009). The association of depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms and postpartum relapse to smoking: A longitudinal study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11(6), 707–714. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Allen, A. M., Prince, C. B., & Dietz, P. M. (2009). Postpartum depressive symptoms and smoking relapse. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(1), 9–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Campo, P., Faden, R. R., Brown, H., et al. (1992). The impact of pregnancy on women’s prenatal and postpartum smoking behavior. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 8(1), 8–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coleman, P. K., Maxey, C. D., Spence, M., et al. (2009). Predictors and correlates of abortion in the fragile families and well-being study: Paternal behavior, substance use, and partner violence. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7, 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts, S. C., Avalos, L. A., Sinkford, D., et al. (2012). Alcohol, tobacco and drug use as reasons for abortion. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 47(6), 640–648. doi:10.1093/alcalc/ags095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kullander, S., & Kallen, B. (1971). A prospective study of smoking and pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 50, 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coleman, P. K., Reardon, D. C., & Cougle, J. R. (2005). Substance use among pregnant women in the context of previous reproductive loss and desire for current pregnancy. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10(Pt 2), 255–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pedersen, W. (2007). Childbirth, abortion and subsequent substance use in young women: A population-based longitudinal study. Addiction, 102(12), 1971–1978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olsson, C. A., Horwill, E., Moore, E., et al. (2014). Social and emotional adjustment following early pregnancy in young Australian women: A comparison of those who terminate, miscarry, or complete pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(6), 698–703.

  21. Coleman, P. K., Reardon, D. C., Rue, V. M., et al. (2002). A history of induced abortion in relation to substance use during subsequent pregnancies carried to term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 187(6), 1673–1678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reardon, D. C., Coleman, P. K., & Cougle, J. R. (2004). Substance use associated with unintended pregnancy outcomes in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 30(2), 369–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dingle, K., Alati, R., Clavarino, A., et al. (2008). Pregnancy loss and psychiatric disorders in young women: An Australian birth cohort study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 193(6), 455–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Upadhyay, U. D., Weitz, T. A., Jones, R. K., et al. (2013). Denial of abortion because of provider gestational age limits in the United States. American Journal of Public Health. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301378.

  25. Rocca, C., Kimport, K., Gould, H., et al. (2013). Women’s emotional responses to unintended pregnancy, abortion and being denied an abortion in the United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45(3), 122–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dobkin, L., Gould, H., Barar, R., et al. (2014). Implementing a prospective study of women seeking abortion in the United States: Understanding and overcoming barriers to recruitment. Women’s Health Issues, 24(1), e115–e123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pazol, K., Zane, S., Parker, W. Y., et al. (2011). Abortion surveillance—United States, 2007. MMWR, 60(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gould, H., Perrucci, A., Barar, R., et al. (2012). Patient education and emotional support practices in abortion care facilities in the United States. Women’s Health Issues, 22(4), e359–e364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Smoking prevalence among women of reproductive age—United States, 2006. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(31), 849–852.

  30. Altfeld, S., Handler, A., Burton, D., et al. (1997). Wantedness of pregnancy and prenatal health behaviors. Women and Health, 26(4), 29–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gipson, J. D., Koenig, M. A., & Hindin, M. J. (2008). The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: A review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning, 39(1), 18–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Morton, L. M., Cahill, J., & Hartge, P. (2006). Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: A survey of practice. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(3), 197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Galea, S., & Tracy, M. (2007). Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Annals of Epidemiology, 17(9), 643–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Components of this study were funded by the Wallace Alexander Gerbode Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and an anonymous foundation. The authors thank Rana Barar, Heather Gould and Sandy Stonesifer for study coordination and management; Janine Carpenter, Undine Darney, Ivette Gomez, Selena Phipps, Claire Schreiber and Danielle Sinkford for conducting interviews; Michaela Ferrari and Elisette Weiss for project support; and Jay Fraser, John Neuhaus, and Caitlin Gerdts for database and statistical assistance. Preliminary findings from this study were presented at the American Public Health Association Conference in San Francisco, CA in October 2012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA

    Sarah C. M. Roberts & Diana Greene Foster

Authors
  1. Sarah C. M. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Diana Greene Foster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah C. M. Roberts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberts, S.C.M., Foster, D.G. Receiving Versus Being Denied an Abortion and Subsequent Tobacco Use. Matern Child Health J 19, 438–446 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1515-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1515-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation