Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 9, pp 2218–2225 | Cite as

Does Social Support Predict Pregnant Mothers’ Information Seeking Behaviors on an Educational Website?

  • Jamie Guillory
  • Jeff Niederdeppe
  • Hyekung Kim
  • J. P. Pollak
  • Meredith Graham
  • Christine Olson
  • Geri Gay


We examine how social support (perceived support and support from a spouse, or committed partner) may influence pregnant women’s information seeking behaviors on a pregnancy website. We assess information seeking behavior among participants in a trial testing the effectiveness of a web-based intervention for appropriate gestational weight gain. Participants were pregnant women (N = 1,329) recruited from clinics and private practices in one county in the Northeast United States. We used logistic regression models to estimate the likelihood of viewing articles, blogs, frequently asked questions (FAQs), and resources on the website as a function of perceived social support, and support from a spouse or relationship partner. All models included socio-demographic controls (income, education, number of adults and children living at home, home Internet use, and race/ethnicity). Compared to single women, women who were married or in a committed relationship were more likely to information seek online by viewing articles (OR 1.95, 95 % CI [1.26–3.03]), FAQs (OR 1.64 [1.00–2.67]), and blogs (OR 1.88 [1.24–2.85]). Women who felt loved and valued (affective support) were more likely to seek information by viewing articles on the website (OR 1.19 [1.00–1.42]). While the Internet provides a space for people who have less social support to access health information, findings from this study suggest that for pregnant women, women who already had social support were most likely to seek information online. This finding has important implications for designing online systems and content to encourage pregnant women with fewer support resources to engage with content.


Spousal support Perceived social support Pregnancy Online information seeking 



This research was supported by funding from the National Institute of Health: HL096760-4 from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsors.

Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Shearin, E. N., et al. (1987). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamarck, T. W., Manuck, S. B., & Jennings, J. R. (1990). Social support reduces cardiovascular reactivity to psychological challenge: A laboratory model. Psychosomatic Medicine, 52, 42–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Garner, W., Speicher, C., et al. (1984). Psychosocial modifiers of immunocompetence in medical students. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46, 7–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Ricker, D., George, J., et al. (1984). Urinary cortisol levels, cellular immunocompetency, and loneliness in psychiatric inpatients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46, 15–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Fisher, L. D., Ogrocki, P., et al. (1987). Marital quality, marital disruption, and immune function. Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 13–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Ahrens, C. (2002). Age differences and similarities in the correlates of depressive symptoms. Psychology and Aging, 17, 116–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins, N. L., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Lobel, M., et al. (1993). Social support in pregnancy: Psychosocial correlates of birth outcome and postpartum depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1243–1258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lederman, R. P. (1984). Psychosocial adaptation in pregnancy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reading, A. (1983). Psychosocial aspects of pregnancy. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kennell, J., Klaus, M., McGrath, S., et al. (1991). Continuous emotional support during labor in a US hospital. Journal of the American Medical Association, 265, 2197–2201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sosa, R., Kennell, J., Klaus, M., et al. (1980). The effect of a supportive companion on perinatal problems, length of labor, and mother-infant interaction. New England Journal of Medicine, 303, 597–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berland, G. K., Elliott, M. N., Morales, L. S., et al. (2001). Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2612–2621.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeGuzman, M. A., & Ross, M. W. (1999). Assessing the application of HIV and AIDS related education and counseling on the Internet. Patient Education and Counseling, 156, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Kalichman, S. C., Benotsch, E. G., Weinhardt, L., et al. (2003). Health-related internet use, coping, social support, and health indicators in people living with HIV/AIDS: Preliminary results from a community survey. Health Psychology, 22, 111–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). Receiving social support online: Implications for health education. Health Education Research, 16, 693–707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lagan, B. M., Sinclair, M., & Kernohan, W. G. (2006). Pregnant women’s use of the Internet: A review of published and unpublished evidence. Evidence Based Midwifery, 4, 17–23.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lagan, B. M., Sinclair, M., & Kernohan, G. (2010). Internet use in pregnancy informs women’s decision-making: A web-based survey. Birth, 37, 106–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lagan, B. M., Sinclair, M., & Kernohan, W. G. (2011). A web-based survey of midwives’ perceptions of women using the Internet in pregnancy: A global phenomenon. Midwifery, 27, 273–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Drentea, P., & Moren-Cross, J. L. (2005). Social capital and social support on the web: The case of an internet mother site. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27, 920–943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niederdeppe, J. (2008). Beyond knowledge gaps: Examining socioeconomic differences in response to cancer news. Human Communication Research, 34, 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Viswanath, K., & Emmons, K. M. (2006). Message effects and social determinants of health: Its application to cancer disparities. Journal of Communication, 56, 238–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harley, K., & Eskenazi, B. (2006). Time in the United States, social support and health behaviors during pregnancy among women of Mexican descent. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 3048–3061.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fletcher, D., Mackenzie, D., & Villouta, E. (2005). Modeling skewed data with many zeros: A simple approach combining ordinary and logistic regression. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 12, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamie Guillory
    • 1
  • Jeff Niederdeppe
    • 2
  • Hyekung Kim
    • 2
  • J. P. Pollak
    • 3
  • Meredith Graham
    • 4
  • Christine Olson
    • 4
  • Geri Gay
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Tobacco Control Research and EducationUCSFSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of CommunicationCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Information ScienceCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  4. 4.Division of Nutritional SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations