Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 920–929 | Cite as

Characterization of Health Care Provider Attitudes Toward Parental Involvement in Neonatal Resuscitation-Related Decision Making in Mongolia

  • Ryan M. McAdams
  • Ronald J. McPherson
  • Maneesh Batra
  • Zagd Gerelmaa
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterize attitudes and practices among health care providers (HCPs) in Mongolia regarding parental involvement in neonatal resuscitation (NR)-related decisions. A voluntary, anonymous questionnaire was administered to 210 HCPs across 19 of 21 Mongolia provinces. Eligible HCPs included midwives, neonatologists, pediatricians, and obstetricians involved in neonatal-perinatal care in both rural and urban hospitals. A total of 210 pediatric HCPs were surveyed and 100 % completed all questions (response rate 100 %). Despite the absence of nation-wide guidelines, NR is uniformly performed at 32-weeks gestation across HCP professions and across rural/urban settings. Most HCPs (67 %) indicate that parents should be counseled about resuscitation, but only 9 % ask the parents if they want their extremely premature child resuscitated and only 17 % counsel the parents prior to birth of an at-risk infant. Most HCPs (72 %) prefer to unilaterally decide when to withdraw NR, and only 28 % indicated that both parents should be involved in the decision. Following a newborn’s death, 75 % of all HCPs reported that they do explain the death to parents, although only 28 % reported receiving any training in parental grief counseling. For HCPs in Mongolia, a discrepancy exists between the perceived value of parental involvement and the actual practice of NR-related counseling. This report is a necessary first step toward understanding the factors that influence NR-related practices in Mongolia, and may serve as model for collecting these types of data in other low and middle income countries.

Keywords

Neonatal resuscitation High-risk pregnancy Neonatal intensive care Prematurity Global health 

Abbreviations

HCPs

Health care providers

NR

Neonatal resuscitation

LMICs

Low and middle income countries

References

  1. 1.
    Perlman, J. M., Wyllie, J., Kattwinkel, J., et al. (2010). Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Pediatrics, 126(5), e1319–e1344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kattwinkel, J., Perlman, J. M., Aziz, K., et al. (2010). Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Pediatrics, 126(5), e1400–e1413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wall, S. N., Lee, A. C., & Niermeyer, S., et al. (2009). Neonatal resuscitation in low-resource settings: What, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up? International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 107(Suppl 1), S47–S62, S63–S44.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singhal, N., Lockyer, J., Fidler, H., et al. (2012). Helping babies breathe: Global neonatal resuscitation program development and formative educational evaluation. Resuscitation, 83(1), 90–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    WHO. (2012). Guidelines on basic newborn resuscitation. In Practical guide (Geneva, Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit, Division of Reproductive Health (Technical Support), World Health Organization), p. 61.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schroeder, J. (2008). Ethical issues for parents of extremely premature infants. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 44(5), 302–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arlettaz, R., Mieth, D., Bucher, H. U., et al. (2005). End-of-life decisions in delivery room and neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatrica, 94(11), 1626–1631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaempf, J. W., Tomlinson, M. W., Campbell, B., et al. (2009). Counseling pregnant women who may deliver extremely premature infants: Medical care guidelines, family choices, and neonatal outcomes. Pediatrics, 123(6), 1509–1515.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paul, D. A., Epps, S., Leef, K. H., et al. (2001). Prenatal consultation with a neonatologist prior to preterm delivery. Journal of Perinatology, 21(7), 431–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bell, E. F. (2007). Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics, 119(2), 401–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Campbell, D. E., & Fleischman, A. R. (2001). Limits of viability: Dilemmas, decisions, and decision makers. American Journal of Perinatology, 18(3), 117–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Batton, D. G. (2009). Clinical report—Antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics, 124(1), 422–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martinez, A. M., Partridge, J. C., Yu, V., et al. (2005). Physician counselling practices and decision making for extremely preterm infants in the Pacific Rim. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 41(4), 209–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bellieni, C. V., & Buonocore, G. (2009). Flaws in the assessment of the best interests of the newborn. Acta Paediatrica, 98(4), 613–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lavin, J. P., Jr., Kantak, A., Ohlinger, J., et al. (2006). Attitudes of obstetric and pediatric health care providers toward resuscitation of infants who are born at the margins of viability. Pediatrics, 118(Suppl 2), S169–S176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cuttini, M., Nadai, M., Kaminski, M., EURONIC Study Group, et al. (2000). End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: Physicians’ self-reported practices in seven European countries. Lancet, 355(9221), 2112–2118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wall, S. N., Lee, A. C., Carlo, W., et al. (2010). Reducing intrapartum-related neonatal deaths in low- and middle-income countries-what works? Seminars in Perinatology, 34(6), 395–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    The World Factbook. (2012). (Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC). Available from: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html.
  19. 19.
    McAdams, R. M., Erdenebileg, A., Batra, M., et al. (2012). Attitudes of healthcare providers towards non-initiation and withdrawal of neonatal resuscitation for preterm infants in Mongolia. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 30(3), 346–352.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blanco, F., Suresh, G., Howard, D., et al. (2005). Ensuring accurate knowledge of prematurity outcomes for prenatal counseling. Pediatrics, 115(4), e478–e487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seri, I., & Evans, J. (2008). Limits of viability: Definition of the gray zone. Journal of Perinatology, 28(Suppl 1), S4–S8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pignotti, M. S., & Donzelli, G. (2008). Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: An international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births. Pediatrics, 121(1), e193–e198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tucker, J., & McGuire, W. (2004). Epidemiology of preterm birth. BMJ, 329(7467), 675–678.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tyson, J. E., Parikh, N. A., Langer, J., et al. (2008). Intensive care for extreme prematurity—moving beyond gestational age. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(16), 1672–1681.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beck, S., Wojdyla, D., Say, L., et al. (2010). The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: A systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(1), 31–38.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sexson, W. R., Cruze, D. K., Escobedo, M. B., et al. (2011). Report of an international conference on the medical and ethical management of the neonate at the edge of viability: A review of approaches from five countries. HEC Forum, 23(1), 31–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Janvier, A., & Barrington, K. J. (2005). The ethics of neonatal resuscitation at the margins of viability: Informed consent and outcomes. Journal of Pediatrics, 147(5), 579–585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Leeuw, R., Cuttini, M., Nadai, M., et al. (2000). Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: An international perspective. Journal of Pediatrics, 137(5), 608–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    MacDonald, H. (2002). Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics, 110(5), 1024–1027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Partridge, J. C., Martinez, A. M., Nishida, H., et al. (2005). International comparison of care for very low birth weight infants: Parents’ perceptions of counseling and decision-making. Pediatrics, 116(2), e263–e271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Billings, J. A., & Krakauer, E. L. (2011). On patient autonomy and physician responsibility in end-of-life care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(9), 849–853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    D’Aloja, E., Floris, L., Muller, M., et al. (2010). Shared decision making in neonatology: An utopia or an attainable goal? The Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 23(Suppl), 356–358.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan M. McAdams
    • 1
  • Ronald J. McPherson
    • 1
  • Maneesh Batra
    • 1
  • Zagd Gerelmaa
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Neonatology, Department of PediatricsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Health Sciences University of MongoliaUlaanbaatarMongolia

Personalised recommendations