Factors Related to Receipt of Well-Child Visits in Insured Children
- 268 Downloads
Our objective was to identify factors related to receipt of the recommended number of well-child visits in insured children. We hypothesized parent insurance status would be related to receipt of well-child visits, with those with uninsured parents more likely to have fewer visits than recommended. Data for the study came from the 2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Household Component. The sample included children <18 years of age with full-year insurance coverage and parents who were insured or uninsured the entire year. The outcome variable indicated whether children had received fewer than the recommended number of well-child visits in physician offices or outpatient departments. Parent, family, and child characteristics were measured. Forty-eight percent of the 4,650 children included in the study had fewer well-child visits than recommended. Children whose parents did not visit a physician during the year and children whose parents had not completed high school were more likely to miss recommended visits. Parent insurance status did not affect well-child visits. We identified child, family, and parent factors influencing well-child visits in insured children, including the parent’s own use of physician visits. Contrary to our hypothesis, well-child visits were not influenced by parent insurance status. Determining which insured children are at greater risk of missing recommended well-child visits aids policymakers in identifying those who may benefit from interventions to improve use of preventive care.
KeywordsParents Child health National surveys Preventive health services Utilization
Federal Poverty Level
Mental Component Summary-12
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Household Component
Physical Component Summary-12
- 5.Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. (1995). Recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. Pediatrics, 96(2 Pt 1), 373–374.Google Scholar
- 17.Wyn, R., Ojeda, V., Ranji, U., & Salganicoff, A. (2003). Women, work, and family health: A balancing act. Menlo Park, CA: KFF Women’s Health Policy. http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2003/04/3336.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2013.
- 20.Machlin, S., Yu, W., & Zodet, M. (2005). Computing standard errors for MEPS estimates. Rockville, MD: AHRQ MEPS. http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/survey_comp/standard_errors.jsp. Accessed June 1, 2013.
- 22.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2008). National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among children aged 19–35 months–United States, 2007. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(35), 961–966.Google Scholar
- 27.Solar, O., & Irwin, A. (2010). A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: Social Determinants of Health Series. http://www.who.int/sdhconference/resources/ConceptualframeworkforactiononSDH_eng.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2013.
- 30.Phillips, R. L., Dodoo, M. S., McCann, J. L., et al. (2005). Report to the task force on the care of children by family physicians. Washington, DC: Robert Graham Center. http://www.graham-center.org/prebuilt/Child_Care_Report.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2013.
- 33.Heberlein, M., Brooks, T., Guyer, J., Artiga, S., & Stephens, J. (2012). Performing under pressure: annual findings of a 50-state survey of eligibility, enrollment, renewal, and cost-sharing policies in Medicaid and CHIP, 2011–2012. Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/8272.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2013.
- 34.National Conference of State Legislatures. (2007). Frequently asked questions. SCHIP. Denver, CO: Forum for State Health Policy Leadership. http://www.ncsl.org/print/health/forum/SCHIPFAQ.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2013.