Use of Fertility Treatments in Relation to the Duration of Pregnancy Attempt Among Women Who Were Trying to Become Pregnant and Experienced a Live Birth
- 254 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to compare the utilization of medical help for fertility among women who reported up to a year versus more than a year of trying to become pregnant and to describe the characteristics of those women seeking early treatment. Data from the 2004–2008 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey were used to assess attempt duration and use of fertility treatments in a sample of 9,517 women who had a recent live birth in Utah. PRAMS respondents who were trying to become pregnant at the time of conception were asked questions about fertility treatments (sampling n = 5,238; representative n = 153,036). Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to describe and compare characteristics of women who sought treatment after attempting pregnancy for a year or less and women who waited at least a year to seek treatment. Among women who were trying to become pregnant, 9.5 % reported using some medical assistance to conceive. Among the women trying to become pregnant, 89.3 % had been trying for ≤12 months and 10.7 % reported having tried >12 months. 5.2 % of those trying to become pregnant for up to a year reported use of fertility treatment, compared with 45.8 % of those trying for a year or more. Women who had previous live births were significantly more likely to use early treatment than nulliparous women (aOR = 2.4, 95 % CI = 1.5, 3.9). The use of fertility drugs and other treatments were more common than ART among recipients of early treatment (aOR = 3.7, 95 % CI = 1.7, 7.9). Some women may be receiving fertility treatment before it is clinically indicated. Instead of invasive treatment, these women may benefit from preconception counseling on folic acid, healthy prepregnancy weight and use of ovulation monitoring to time intercourse.
KeywordsPRAMS ART Infertility Utah Time-trying
We thank Dr. Jim VanDerslice and Dr. Lisa Gren for their helpful expertise in STATA 11.0, using survey data and weighted numbers. We thank the Utah Department of Health for facilitating access to the PRAMS data.
- 1.Chandra, A., Martinez, G. M., Mosher, W. D., et al. (2005). Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of US women: Data from the 2002 national survey of family growth. Vital & health statistics, 23(25), 1–160.Google Scholar
- 2.Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., et al. (2009). The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world health organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Human Reproduction, 24(11), 2683–2687. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.van der Steeg, J. W., Steures, P., Hompes, P. G. A., et al. (2005). Investigation of the infertile couple: A basic fertility work-up performed within 12 months of trying to conceive generates costs and complications for no particular benefit. Human Reproduction, 20(10), 2672–2674. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Baksh, L., McGarry, J., Bloebaum, L., Stanford, J., Simonsen, SE. (2009). PRAMS Perspective: Infertility treatments and pregnancy outcomes in Utah 2009.Google Scholar
- 7.PRAMS. (2008). Utah PRAMS Data Book: 2004–2005. Data Book: PRAMS; Reproductive health; Maternal and child health; Community and family health; Health 2008 July 2008.Google Scholar
- 10.CDC. (2005). Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS): Methodology: Centers for disease control and prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A, N. C. f. C. D. P. a. H. P. Division of Reproductive Health.Google Scholar
- 12.U.S. Census Bureau. The 2009 Census and the American Community Survey 1-year estimates. U.S. Census Bureau, [Washington, D.C.]. (2009). http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GRTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=D&-_box_head_nbr=R1205&-ds_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G00_&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&-format=D&-mt_name=ACS_2009_1YR_G00_R1204_US30.
- 13.CDC. (2009). National vital statistics system, Births 2004–2005.Google Scholar
- 14.Mathews, T. J., Hamilton, B. E. (2009). Delayed childbearing: More women are having theirfirst child later in life. NCHS Data Brief. 21.Google Scholar
- 15.Schramm, D. G., Marshall, J. P., Harris, V. W., George, A. (2003). Marriage in Utah: 2003 baseline statewide survey on marriage and divorce.Google Scholar
- 20.Bromer, J. G., Ata, B., Seli, M., et al. (2011). Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: A cost analysis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 23(3), 168–173. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834551cd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Van Voorhis, B. J., & Syrop, C. H. (2000). Cost-effective treatment for the couple with infertility. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 43(4), 958–973.Google Scholar
- 22.Billingham, K. (2011). Preparing for parenthood: The role of antenatal education. Community Practice, 84(5), 36–38.Google Scholar
- 23.Stanford, J. B., White, G. L., & Hatasaka, H. (2002). Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: Current evidence. Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 100, 1333–1341.Google Scholar